Oh goody. I see the Daily mail and the telegraph sports Journos are up Hodgsons arse for his article so it will make the papers and Lambert will be pelted with it in his presser.I am sure that will help Lambert and the team focus as they train for Sunday.Jesus.
That he says we never had 4 bad seasons in a row under Ellis makes me think he is a prat.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:17:56 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 10:35:34 PMIt could be taken a bit more seriously if he hadn't just had a falling out with the board. He was saying this stuff way before they booted him out of the directors. And he wonders why they did?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 10:35:34 PMIt could be taken a bit more seriously if he hadn't just had a falling out with the board. He was saying this stuff way before they booted him out of the directors.
It could be taken a bit more seriously if he hadn't just had a falling out with the board.
The bottom line is something I found out a long time ago; the only thing that matters to the vast majority of supporters is how the team is doing. Randy could live on Mars if we were in the top half of the table. None of this week's outpouring of rage would have happened if it was us who'd scored in stoppage time on Sunday.
Quote from: Rudy Lambert on February 26, 2014, 11:11:03 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on February 26, 2014, 10:29:33 PM"The Hodgson Report"What a self important twat. Whilst the 2003 Hodgson Report was a pile of shit, his comments above are more or less spot-on. Very hard to argue with the majority of the article.First thing that shocked me was why Randy would share with Lambert Hodgson's letter. It seems the monkey controls the organ grinder.Tail wagging the dog, sort of thing. I also found that strange. Lambert must be equally seething seeing the slating he is getting everywhere. I reckon Culverhouse will be having words with the crowd again soon as he is bound to get some stick.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on February 26, 2014, 10:29:33 PM"The Hodgson Report"What a self important twat. Whilst the 2003 Hodgson Report was a pile of shit, his comments above are more or less spot-on. Very hard to argue with the majority of the article.First thing that shocked me was why Randy would share with Lambert Hodgson's letter. It seems the monkey controls the organ grinder.
"The Hodgson Report"What a self important twat.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 11:19:15 PMQuote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:17:56 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 10:35:34 PMIt could be taken a bit more seriously if he hadn't just had a falling out with the board. He was saying this stuff way before they booted him out of the directors. And he wonders why they did?Well at least he had the balls to say it.
And he wonders why they did?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 10:49:51 PMThe bottom line is something I found out a long time ago; the only thing that matters to the vast majority of supporters is how the team is doing. Randy could live on Mars if we were in the top half of the table. None of this week's outpouring of rage would have happened if it was us who'd scored in stoppage time on Sunday. Yes but it is in a time of crisis that you want to feel reassured by the owner's presence and leadership.
I have a sneaking suspicion that When Randy sells up he will have made a very tidy amount of money out of us...A sneaking suspicion Fergal ?Of course he will make a very tidy amount of money.How much did he lose when he sold the Cleveland Browns ?Credit to Lerner for giving it a go with his first Manager, Acorns, the Holte pub and the training facilities.Of course he will make a very tidy amount of money.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:27:45 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 11:19:15 PMQuote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:17:56 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 10:35:34 PMIt could be taken a bit more seriously if he hadn't just had a falling out with the board. He was saying this stuff way before they booted him out of the directors. And he wonders why they did?Well at least he had the balls to say it. A lot of people are saying a lot of things. It doesn't mean that they are right or that their opinions deserve to go unchallenged.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 11:19:15 PMAnd he wonders why they did?Don't bite the hand that feeds, I guess. Although I have no idea what kind of feed you get in the Director's Box.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 11:31:07 PMQuote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:27:45 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 11:19:15 PMQuote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:17:56 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 10:35:34 PMIt could be taken a bit more seriously if he hadn't just had a falling out with the board. He was saying this stuff way before they booted him out of the directors. And he wonders why they did?Well at least he had the balls to say it. A lot of people are saying a lot of things. It doesn't mean that they are right or that their opinions deserve to go unchallenged.He's said his piece and he's entitled to do so and he's been thrown out of the Directors because of it. Good luck luck to him, I agree with everything he's said, and it's good to see prominent Villa fans actually standing up and protesting at the way Villa have gone into decline over the last 4 years. I don't see much of that from you, Dave, and you're the editor of the only independent Villa fanzine. In fact i often see you jumping to Lerner's defence on here. Why is that?
Quote from: Isa on February 26, 2014, 11:28:48 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 10:49:51 PMThe bottom line is something I found out a long time ago; the only thing that matters to the vast majority of supporters is how the team is doing. Randy could live on Mars if we were in the top half of the table. None of this week's outpouring of rage would have happened if it was us who'd scored in stoppage time on Sunday. Yes but it is in a time of crisis that you want to feel reassured by the owner's presence and leadership.I don't entirely agree. You want someone's reassurance, not necessarily the owner. It goes back to a debate we had on here a few months ago - the club needs a figurehead (not a president or the mythical 'football man') who is respected by supporters and the general football public, who can offer such reassurance that things are either moving in the right direction or being dealt with.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:36:24 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 11:31:07 PMQuote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:27:45 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 11:19:15 PMQuote from: saunders_heroes on February 26, 2014, 11:17:56 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 26, 2014, 10:35:34 PMIt could be taken a bit more seriously if he hadn't just had a falling out with the board. He was saying this stuff way before they booted him out of the directors. And he wonders why they did?Well at least he had the balls to say it. A lot of people are saying a lot of things. It doesn't mean that they are right or that their opinions deserve to go unchallenged.He's said his piece and he's entitled to do so and he's been thrown out of the Directors because of it. Good luck luck to him, I agree with everything he's said, and it's good to see prominent Villa fans actually standing up and protesting at the way Villa have gone into decline over the last 4 years. I don't see much of that from you, Dave, and you're the editor of the only independent Villa fanzine. In fact i often see you jumping to Lerner's defence on here. Why is that?Because it's what I think, maybe? Do you expect me to change my opinion because it's fashionable or might get a few likes on Facebook?