collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by Mister E
[Today at 04:46:35 PM]


Matty Cash by andyh
[Today at 04:43:17 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Mister E
[Today at 04:38:12 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by JUAN PABLO
[Today at 04:33:00 PM]


Multiball Sanction by Exeter 77
[Today at 04:13:23 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 04:08:02 PM]


Leon Bailey by Matt C
[Today at 03:09:32 PM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle Match Thread by Stu82
[Today at 02:35:11 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull  (Read 1758722 times)

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11740
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14220 on: March 14, 2015, 11:51:43 AM »
But right here and right now a centre forward that cost £1m quid and wages who is likely to never play for us again and scored 1 goal has surely got to be considered a waste of cash, no matter what the circumstances?

Bennett, may do this or may do that, but what he has done has been poor.

Okore looks like he will develop in to a better player but does have concentration issues right now but generally looks to be ok.

I'm sure they all have potential but I'm only giving an opinion on what they've given us so far. I'd say there was more of a debate over if someone like Westwood could be considered a success or just Ok.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14221 on: March 14, 2015, 12:02:21 PM »
You're right.

But rather than concede this point, his enemies use his cheap and cheerful buys as a distraction from his very good purchases.

His bad buys far, far outweigh his good ones.


I agree with Risso. You can argue in his defence that they were relatively cheap but it still adds up to a lot of quids wasted.
I'd say that the biggest list would be signings that were just 'alright'. There have been a few unqualified successes and a few complete failures. Most would fall somewhere in between.

I don't think there haven't been any "unqualified" successes.  Even Benteke, who was superb in his first season, has been hugely disappointing this season.

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14222 on: March 14, 2015, 12:08:51 PM »
We've gone from buying expensive players on high wages that are hard to get rid of to punts on unknown players on high wages that are impossible to get rid of.

I'm not sure which was the more damaging

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75960
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14223 on: March 14, 2015, 12:15:16 PM »
There are maybe 6 or 7 that would fall into the "failure" category, and their fees and wages combined will probably be less than a Warnock. I doubt there are many managers in the world who have signed 20+ players and half a dozen of them haven't been failures.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75960
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14224 on: March 14, 2015, 12:17:38 PM »
We've gone from buying expensive players on high wages that are hard to get rid of to punts on unknown players on high wages that are impossible to get rid of.

I'm not sure which was the more damaging

I doubt many, if any, of the "failures" were/are on much more than 20K a week which may seem a fortune to us but is nothing in the modern game. KEA is probably the only one and we got rid of him easy enough. And even he I would say was more "meh" than failure.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43838
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14225 on: March 14, 2015, 12:29:23 PM »
Bad tactics, lack of leadership, players without bottle and a general stink around the club.
OK other than that he wasn't too bad?

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47607
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14226 on: March 14, 2015, 12:29:25 PM »
I don't think there haven't been any "unqualified" successes.  Even Benteke, who was superb in his first season, has been hugely disappointing this season.
He has been disappointing this season, but he has still been a complete success as a transfer.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15660
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14227 on: March 14, 2015, 12:32:23 PM »
He also signed Jordan Bowery who was so out of his depth I felt sorry for him.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74577
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14228 on: March 14, 2015, 12:33:25 PM »
I don't think there haven't been any "unqualified" successes.  Even Benteke, who was superb in his first season, has been hugely disappointing this season.
He has been disappointing this season, but he has still been a complete success as a transfer.

82 appearances, 38 goals.

As near as dammit to a one in two striker, one who cost us peanuts and who we could easily sell for 5 times as much as he cost us if we wanted.

That's absolutely a success by any measure.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74577
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14229 on: March 14, 2015, 12:34:17 PM »
He also signed Jordan Bowery who was so out of his depth I felt sorry for him.


He signed some who worked, some who didn't.

Lambert was a disaster as a manager and we should have binned him ages ago, but his transfer record was pretty good.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15660
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14230 on: March 14, 2015, 12:35:41 PM »
He also signed Jordan Bowery who was so out of his depth I felt sorry for him.


He signed some who worked, some who didn't.

Lambert was a disaster as a manager and we should have binned him ages ago, but his transfer record was pretty good.


I don't agree with that. He signed some of the poorest players I've ever seen at this club.

Offline Ad@m

  • Member
  • Posts: 12563
  • GM : 23.03.2023
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14231 on: March 14, 2015, 12:35:45 PM »
I don't think there haven't been any "unqualified" successes.  Even Benteke, who was superb in his first season, has been hugely disappointing this season.
He has been disappointing this season, but he has still been a complete success as a transfer.

82 appearances, 38 goals.

As near as dammit to a one in two striker, one who cost us peanuts and who we could easily sell for 5 times as much as he cost us if we wanted.

That's absolutely a success by any measure.

I agree he's a been a success but I think your numbers are wrong.  I thought the general view was that he cost us £8m, which isn't exactly peanuts, and if we were to try to sell him now I don't think anyone would pay more than £20m for him given his injury record to date.

Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47607
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14232 on: March 14, 2015, 12:38:53 PM »
I don't think anyone would pay more than £20m for him given his injury record to date.
We're working in a market place though where Shane Long costs £12m, Danny Wellbeck costs £16m and Romelu Lukaku costs £28m. I agree we probably wouldn't get £35m if we decided to sell, but I bet we'd get a fair bit more than £20m.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58532
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14233 on: March 14, 2015, 12:40:42 PM »
I don't think there haven't been any "unqualified" successes.  Even Benteke, who was superb in his first season, has been hugely disappointing this season.
He has been disappointing this season, but he has still been a complete success as a transfer.

82 appearances, 38 goals.

As near as dammit to a one in two striker, one who cost us peanuts and who we could easily sell for 5 times as much as he cost us if we wanted.

That's absolutely a success by any measure.

And factor in he's missed a good number of games through a serious injury, come back in record time and played in one of the most conservative, choking, stifling offensive systems in PL history that's still a great return. He's been a resounding success. And as for Lambert's transfers I would sooner judge them playing for the current manager in a system that allows them to express themselves than anything from the precious 6-7 months. On the whole, in my opinion, almost all of his buys not from the charity bucket have been good to very good.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63343
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull
« Reply #14234 on: March 14, 2015, 12:43:59 PM »
He also signed Jordan Bowery who was so out of his depth I felt sorry for him.


He signed some who worked, some who didn't.

Lambert was a disaster as a manager and we should have binned him ages ago, but his transfer record was pretty good.


I don't agree with that. He signed some of the poorest players I've ever seen at this club.

You could say that about every manager.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal