collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Monty
[Today at 07:53:23 AM]


All Time Worst XI by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 05:42:37 AM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 05:38:57 AM]


Roberto Olabe by Matt C
[Today at 03:16:46 AM]


Other Villa stuff by adrenachrome
[Today at 02:49:19 AM]


When Sunday comes - Leeds away by adrenachrome
[Today at 02:29:28 AM]


Boxing 2025 by dave.woodhall
[Today at 12:08:47 AM]


Dirty Leeds v Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by trinityoap
[November 22, 2025, 11:33:22 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Monty
[Today at 07:53:23 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by TelfordVilla
[Today at 07:50:52 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Monty
[Today at 07:48:29 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by andyh
[Today at 07:46:41 AM]


Re: All Time Worst XI by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 05:42:37 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 05:38:57 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Toronto Villa
[Today at 04:04:34 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by cdbearsfan
[Today at 03:40:24 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull  (Read 1829598 times)

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 23883
  • Location: Salop
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12225 on: January 17, 2015, 01:12:37 AM »
The protest. Against Lerner? Strikes me as weird. He has plunged several millions in and around the club. Yes, made a huge mistake by letting MON loose with the cheque book and we have been paying for it since. But. He has given Lambert money. Cut the wage bill, fair enough. But has given Lambert the chance to buy a load of shit and have to get rid of most of them again. For me, Lambert first, then Lerner. Lambert is a shockingly bad Manager. He needs to go. Lerner also needs to go, but I don't think he is damaging the club half as much as Lambert.

Everything I've ever read about the correlation between money spent and success in football has always concluded that it doesn't matter what you spend on transfer fees (there are Newcastles/QPRs/Monacos everywhere) but the teams who pay the most in wages have the most success. Admittedly, these things were, I think, studied pre-Man City/PSG, but the fact that wages have been squeezed further than fees at Villa makes me point the finger at Lerner rather than Lambert.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15675
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12226 on: January 17, 2015, 12:56:51 PM »
The protest. Against Lerner? Strikes me as weird. He has plunged several millions in and around the club. Yes, made a huge mistake by letting MON loose with the cheque book and we have been paying for it since. But. He has given Lambert money. Cut the wage bill, fair enough. But has given Lambert the chance to buy a load of shit and have to get rid of most of them again. For me, Lambert first, then Lerner. Lambert is a shockingly bad Manager. He needs to go. Lerner also needs to go, but I don't think he is damaging the club half as much as Lambert.

Everything I've ever read about the correlation between money spent and success in football has always concluded that it doesn't matter what you spend on transfer fees (there are Newcastles/QPRs/Monacos everywhere) but the teams who pay the most in wages have the most success. Admittedly, these things were, I think, studied pre-Man City/PSG, but the fact that wages have been squeezed further than fees at Villa makes me point the finger at Lerner rather than Lambert.

Indeed. You pay peanuts you get monkeys, and that's why we're in the brown stuff right now. Lerner is to blame for the club's decline 100%, in my opinion of course.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15176
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12227 on: January 17, 2015, 01:00:52 PM »
The protest. Against Lerner? Strikes me as weird. He has plunged several millions in and around the club. Yes, made a huge mistake by letting MON loose with the cheque book and we have been paying for it since. But. He has given Lambert money. Cut the wage bill, fair enough. But has given Lambert the chance to buy a load of shit and have to get rid of most of them again. For me, Lambert first, then Lerner. Lambert is a shockingly bad Manager. He needs to go. Lerner also needs to go, but I don't think he is damaging the club half as much as Lambert.

Everything I've ever read about the correlation between money spent and success in football has always concluded that it doesn't matter what you spend on transfer fees (there are Newcastles/QPRs/Monacos everywhere) but the teams who pay the most in wages have the most success. Admittedly, these things were, I think, studied pre-Man City/PSG, but the fact that wages have been squeezed further than fees at Villa makes me point the finger at Lerner rather than Lambert.

Indeed. You pay peanuts you get monkeys, and that's why we're in the brown stuff right now. Lerner is to blame for the club's decline 100%, in my opinion of course.


Although this is true, it doesn't make Lambert a better manager, just a less bad one given that our maximum position right now probably isn't all that higher than we are now.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15675
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12228 on: January 17, 2015, 01:10:23 PM »
The protest. Against Lerner? Strikes me as weird. He has plunged several millions in and around the club. Yes, made a huge mistake by letting MON loose with the cheque book and we have been paying for it since. But. He has given Lambert money. Cut the wage bill, fair enough. But has given Lambert the chance to buy a load of shit and have to get rid of most of them again. For me, Lambert first, then Lerner. Lambert is a shockingly bad Manager. He needs to go. Lerner also needs to go, but I don't think he is damaging the club half as much as Lambert.

Everything I've ever read about the correlation between money spent and success in football has always concluded that it doesn't matter what you spend on transfer fees (there are Newcastles/QPRs/Monacos everywhere) but the teams who pay the most in wages have the most success. Admittedly, these things were, I think, studied pre-Man City/PSG, but the fact that wages have been squeezed further than fees at Villa makes me point the finger at Lerner rather than Lambert.

Indeed. You pay peanuts you get monkeys, and that's why we're in the brown stuff right now. Lerner is to blame for the club's decline 100%, in my opinion of course.


Although this is true, it doesn't make Lambert a better manager, just a less bad one given that our maximum position right now probably isn't all that higher than we are now.

Oh I agree. Lambert has stank the place out far too long now but lets not forget who employed him and then rewarded home with a brand new 4 year deal after nearly relegating us last season.
Lerner is a incompetent buffoon who humiliated us left right and centre.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75192
  • GM : 22.10.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12229 on: January 17, 2015, 04:52:57 PM »
I am starting to think Lerner and Fox actually want us to get relegated.

What other reason could there be for then not doing what really obviously needs to be done?

Offline CT

  • Member
  • Posts: 7474
  • Location: Cheltenhamshire lalala
    • http://astonvilla.blogfootball.com/CT
  • GM : 11.02.2024
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12230 on: January 17, 2015, 04:53:33 PM »
Please let this end soon. Please.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56301
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12231 on: January 17, 2015, 04:55:11 PM »
and again, Fuck off and leave. 0 goals in 5 games is absolutely disgusting.

Offline Deano's Mullet

  • Member
  • Posts: 23009
  • Location: Erdington now Sussex
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12232 on: January 17, 2015, 04:56:50 PM »
It honestly feels nailed on doesn't it? We're gone.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75192
  • GM : 22.10.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12233 on: January 17, 2015, 04:57:36 PM »
1 goal in our last 7 games.

How is this even remotely acceptable?

Please, please, please Lerner, do the right thing and sack this fucking chancer before it is too late.

Offline caster troy

  • Member
  • Posts: 1550
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post QPR
« Reply #12234 on: January 17, 2015, 04:59:32 PM »
Some records for Lambert and Lerner to set their sights on this season:

Fewest goals scored in a season: 20, Derby County (2007–08)
Fewest goals scored at home in a season: 10, Manchester City (2006–07)
Most consecutive losses in a season : 15, Sunderland (2002–03)
Most home losses in a season: 14, Sunderland (2002–03), (2005–06)




To be fair, we're absolutely shit at the moment, and have been for two years, but we're not going to be nudging any of those records.

Hate to say I told you so...

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - NEW POLL post-Manchester United
« Reply #12235 on: January 17, 2015, 05:05:15 PM »
this is now so far beyond egregious that I am considering the possibility that the Paul Lambert known at Norwich was in fact abducted by aliens on his way to Villa Park and substituted with the a clueless doppelganger . It's the only rational explanation

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75192
  • GM : 22.10.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after Liverpool
« Reply #12236 on: January 17, 2015, 05:08:41 PM »
Some records for Lambert and Lerner to set their sights on this season:

Fewest goals scored in a season: 20, Derby County (2007–08)
Fewest goals scored at home in a season: 10, Manchester City (2006–07)
Most consecutive losses in a season : 15, Sunderland (2002–03)
Most home losses in a season: 14, Sunderland (2002–03), (2005–06)




To be fair, we're absolutely shit at the moment, and have been for two years, but we're not going to be nudging any of those records.

Hate to say I told you so...


You did.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75192
  • GM : 22.10.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after Liverpool
« Reply #12237 on: January 17, 2015, 05:08:53 PM »
Reset the poll.

Offline Deano's Mullet

  • Member
  • Posts: 23009
  • Location: Erdington now Sussex
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after Liverpool
« Reply #12238 on: January 17, 2015, 05:09:48 PM »
Sack him.

Offline curiousorange

  • Member
  • Posts: 9402
  • Location: In the sauce
    • Chris Stanley's Bazaar
Re: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after Liverpool
« Reply #12239 on: January 17, 2015, 05:19:26 PM »
I've voted to get him gone every time this poll has been run. No positive results convince me he's anything but a failure, and I would have voted to sack him if we'd have won 5-0 today. He's sodding, bloody, cowing useless.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal