collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 04:57:27 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Somniloquism
[Today at 04:48:09 PM]


Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by Mister E
[Today at 04:46:35 PM]


Matty Cash by andyh
[Today at 04:43:17 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Mister E
[Today at 04:38:12 PM]


Multiball Sanction by Exeter 77
[Today at 04:13:23 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 04:08:02 PM]


Leon Bailey by Matt C
[Today at 03:09:32 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull  (Read 1758915 times)

Offline ciggiesnbeer

  • Member
  • Posts: 6794
  • Location: Mass hysteria for Aston Villa. Some team from the mountains in Russia
  • GM : 23.01.2019
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3090 on: April 05, 2014, 08:19:31 PM »
I'd hope there was some sort of performance related break clause in the contract.

This made me laugh.

This is from an Owner / CEO who didn't have a contingency plan when O'Neill fucked off, recruited (eventually) an ill Has Been Domeneque fan and side kick stooge who messed up in record timeand followed this up with the single most disastrous appointment in the modern history of Villa.

This little lot cost us the best part of £15m including a fairly hefty goodwill payment to our near neighbours.

And you think they have the vision to have a performance related clause.

They were going to offer him a new contract a few weeks back.

You mean McAllister? I thought he did rather well. Probably the only bright point in the past few years.

Online rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9659
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3091 on: April 05, 2014, 08:30:53 PM »
I'd hope there was some sort of performance related break clause in the contract.

This made me laugh.

This is from an Owner / CEO who didn't have a contingency plan when O'Neill fucked off, recruited (eventually) an ill Has Been Domeneque fan and side kick stooge who messed up in record timeand followed this up with the single most disastrous appointment in the modern history of Villa.

This little lot cost us the best part of £15m including a fairly hefty goodwill payment to our near neighbours.

And you think they have the vision to have a performance related clause.

They were going to offer him a new contract a few weeks back.

You mean McAllister? I thought he did rather well. Probably the only bright point in the past few years.

I mean both of them - they turned us from Top 6 into Relegation Scrappers 3 months after they took over. Only spending £30m+ in January saved us. And even then he had to bring back players they had apparently alienated.


Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 87
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3092 on: April 05, 2014, 08:34:55 PM »
As the young bloke who sits behind me said when we went 2-1 down today  even if we get £20 million from the owner to spend in the summer, that squad is so weak and so full of inferior players £20 million will go nowhere.   I think we need 8 or 10 better players than those we have in the squad.   We had hoped that four or five good quality players might make the difference but on today's evidence we have at least six or seven more for the Bomb Squad.

He needs two good full backs (plus the one we have on loan) two central defenders to back up Vlaar and Okore, a proven striker to go with Kozak/Benteke a creative midfield general and a holding midfield and a fast direct wide player be he winger or wing back.

With a budget of twenty million as some funster on here put it he will be shopping in Poundland Latvia again.

We keep coming back all the time to the need for the owner to understand that the ownership of a premiership football club requires constant massive investment.   The tap cannot be turned off and on without long term structural damage to your investment which is what we are watching on days like today.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74577
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3093 on: April 05, 2014, 08:37:16 PM »
I think if you look at the players currently with us who are not - currently - good enough, it is quite frightening.

I tend to agree. 20m will be not nearly enough.

Online Villafirst

  • Member
  • Posts: 7354
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3094 on: April 05, 2014, 08:38:36 PM »
Once again, not a jot grom our leader - how can he support a useless jerk like PL? He should've gone after the C Palace & Sheff Utd defeats. We're like a rudderless ship in the ocean.

Offline OzVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 7997
  • Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
  • GM : 16.08.2023
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3095 on: April 05, 2014, 08:42:55 PM »
I'm a believer in stability and with our financial constraints the long term plan of polishing up young, hungry youth players appealed to me at first.

But it isn't working and with this set of players it won't. They are no where near good enough.

Lambert, with the best will in the world, is incapable of improving them (see Weimann, Lowton, Bowery, Bennett, Baker) and tactically he is poor. Every know and then he stumbles across a formula which brings success only for it to be ditched next game for hoof and hope football.

I'm not sure if he's a bit thick or just doesn't trust the group. Either way for he first time I actually think enough is enough, time for a change.

Lerner is still our biggest problem though and has been for a few years now.


« Last Edit: April 05, 2014, 08:45:44 PM by OzVilla »

Online Louzie0

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15879
  • Location: wrangling jellied eels in the Albert Dock
  • UTV: I’m retired, hurrah!
  • GM : 04.03.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3096 on: April 05, 2014, 08:44:27 PM »
Once again, not a jot grom our leader - how can he support a useless jerk like PL? He should've gone after the C Palace & Sheff Utd defeats. We're like a rudderless ship in the ocean.

Kim Jong-Un is a fan as well?

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26271
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3097 on: April 05, 2014, 08:45:52 PM »
Once again, not a jot grom our leader - how can he support a useless jerk like PL? He should've gone after the C Palace & Sheff Utd defeats. We're like a rudderless ship in the ocean.

Kim Jong-Un is a fan as well?
Yes he taught Lambert everything he knows about football.

Online Louzie0

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15879
  • Location: wrangling jellied eels in the Albert Dock
  • UTV: I’m retired, hurrah!
  • GM : 04.03.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3098 on: April 05, 2014, 08:48:18 PM »
Once again, not a jot grom our leader - how can he support a useless jerk like PL? He should've gone after the C Palace & Sheff Utd defeats. We're like a rudderless ship in the ocean.

Kim Jong-Un is a fan as well?
Yes he taught Lambert everything he knows about football.
Certainly looks like it this weekend. I am so pissed off I could invade somewhere.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43241
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3099 on: April 05, 2014, 08:53:10 PM »
I'd hope there was some sort of performance related break clause in the contract.

This made me laugh.

This is from an Owner / CEO who didn't have a contingency plan when O'Neill fucked off, recruited (eventually) an ill Has Been Domeneque fan and side kick stooge who messed up in record timeand followed this up with the single most disastrous appointment in the modern history of Villa.

This little lot cost us the best part of £15m including a fairly hefty goodwill payment to our near neighbours.

And you think they have the vision to have a performance related clause.

They were going to offer him a new contract a few weeks back.

You mean McAllister? I thought he did rather well. Probably the only bright point in the past few years.

Under him we lost 2-1 to WBA when they only had 10 men. He was not the answer.

Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 87
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3100 on: April 05, 2014, 08:59:46 PM »
OzVilla your observations are precisely correct, especially the comment about Lambert not improving the players he has bought.   It is one thing to spot potential, it is a very different thing to bring out that potential and to put it to work.   Add to that inability to polish young players a proclivity to have favourites and it becomes pretty obvious why our young players who arrived in hope are headed for the bomb squad.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37261
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3101 on: April 05, 2014, 09:02:59 PM »
I don't think the squad is as bad as they look right now, they all look terrified, every touch is tense as if they're expecting to fuck it up.  Watch the games against Norwich and Chelsea again, these guys can play good football and be very effective.  Lambert says he can't explain why they're not doing better, which sums up the problem, explaining why our players are shit scared of playing at Villa Park is his job.  What has really turned me against him though is that he has a kid who is in the form of his life sat on the bench, who has everything to go on and be a really big player for us and he won't bring him on.

Offline pooligan

  • Member
  • Posts: 6744
  • Location: Birmingham or Antibes Sourh of France
  • Villa till i die
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3102 on: April 05, 2014, 09:12:01 PM »
Another thing that annoys me about Lambert is the way he treats players who are not playing .You never see the likes of Helenius ,Bowery,Luna,Lowton,Steer,Sylla etc ever playing for the reserves.These guys go for weeks without actually playing,so you would think that they all lack match fitness.Everything about this manager shows he is out of his depth

Offline mike

  • Member
  • Posts: 2356
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3103 on: April 05, 2014, 09:15:12 PM »
We are no further forward than we were under McLeish. We have spent a fortune and, if anything, the squad is weaker than under TSM. Most of his signings have been an utter waste of money. I can't get to matches now, but if I could I don't think I could possibly justify the time and expense of going to Villa Park. I just can't imagine it is even close to being a good way to spend a Saturday. And I used to do a 400 mile round trip to watch the Villa in the days of JG.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58532
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #3104 on: April 05, 2014, 09:17:19 PM »
He can spot potential and he has got more out them than their original value in the case of a number of players. What he has failed to do is ensure that some of those players maintain their initial development. He has also failed to implement any consistent system or style of play thus again hampering the development of the players. Our players have become one dimensional, where when it is going to plan it looks good, when it isn't they look lost and devoid of any ideas on how to correct a situation.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2014, 09:20:34 PM by Toronto Villa »

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal