collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Aston Villa v Newcastle Post-Match Thread by Mister E
[Today at 04:46:35 PM]


Matty Cash by andyh
[Today at 04:43:17 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Mister E
[Today at 04:38:12 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by JUAN PABLO
[Today at 04:33:00 PM]


Multiball Sanction by Exeter 77
[Today at 04:13:23 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 04:08:02 PM]


Leon Bailey by Matt C
[Today at 03:09:32 PM]


Aston Villa vs Newcastle Match Thread by Stu82
[Today at 02:35:11 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull  (Read 1758704 times)

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58532
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2475 on: March 28, 2014, 10:04:26 PM »
The private jet is only a story because somebody found out about it. Had nobody known about the jet bit the story itself would never have become what it did. It would have been just about us meeting one of a number of potential managers for the club and we might have found about it or we might not have.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63343
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2476 on: March 28, 2014, 10:07:40 PM »
The private jet is only a story because somebody found out about it. Had nobody known about the jet bit the story itself would never have become what it did. It would have been just about us meeting one of a number of potential managers for the club and we might have found about it or we might not have.

He was the first choice. Trust me on this one.   

Offline Irish villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 8526
  • Age: 39
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2477 on: March 28, 2014, 10:10:20 PM »
The private jet is only a story because somebody found out about it. Had nobody known about the jet bit the story itself would never have become what it did. It would have been just about us meeting one of a number of potential managers for the club and we might have found about it or we might not have.

He was the first choice. Trust me on this one.   

Bullet dodged.

Offline mike

  • Member
  • Posts: 2356
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2478 on: March 28, 2014, 10:17:23 PM »
I'm just deeply unconvinced that he's any good. I don't buy the fact that we're mid table being relevant when we're actually closer in terms of points difference to 20th than 9th. We might finish tenth at best, at worst we could be much lower. I don't buy the austerity/early days in a big project argument when we are only a point ahead of big spenders Hull and two ahead of Norwich.

I am genuinely interested to know what those who support Lambert see as his strong points. Tactics, motivation, talent spotting? I just can't see anything that good about him, and I'm not being revisionist, I never have done.

Offline mike

  • Member
  • Posts: 2356
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2479 on: March 28, 2014, 10:19:03 PM »
The private jet is only a story because somebody found out about it. Had nobody known about the jet bit the story itself would never have become what it did. It would have been just about us meeting one of a number of potential managers for the club and we might have found about it or we might not have.

He was the first choice. Trust me on this one.   

So presumably he turned us down and then signed for a Cardiff team in utter disarray with a mad chairman. Bullet dodged indeed.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63343
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2480 on: March 28, 2014, 10:31:27 PM »
The private jet is only a story because somebody found out about it. Had nobody known about the jet bit the story itself would never have become what it did. It would have been just about us meeting one of a number of potential managers for the club and we might have found about it or we might not have.

He was the first choice. Trust me on this one.   

So presumably he turned us down and then signed for a Cardiff team in utter disarray with a mad chairman. Bullet dodged indeed.

I daresay Sir Graham turned down better prospects than a freefalling, riven-apart second division club. Sometimes the time has to be right.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75960
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2481 on: March 28, 2014, 10:42:59 PM »
I'm just deeply unconvinced that he's any good. I don't buy the fact that we're mid table being relevant when we're actually closer in terms of points difference to 20th than 9th. We might finish tenth at best, at worst we could be much lower. I don't buy the austerity/early days in a big project argument when we are only a point ahead of big spenders Hull and two ahead of Norwich.

I am genuinely interested to know what those who support Lambert see as his strong points. Tactics, motivation, talent spotting? I just can't see anything that good about him, and I'm not being revisionist, I never have done.

Probably worth mentioning both Hull and Norwich have spent more than us on transfers this season.

Online rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9659
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2482 on: March 28, 2014, 11:04:15 PM »
I'm just deeply unconvinced that he's any good. I don't buy the fact that we're mid table being relevant when we're actually closer in terms of points difference to 20th than 9th. We might finish tenth at best, at worst we could be much lower. I don't buy the austerity/early days in a big project argument when we are only a point ahead of big spenders Hull and two ahead of Norwich.

I am genuinely interested to know what those who support Lambert see as his strong points. Tactics, motivation, talent spotting? I just can't see anything that good about him, and I'm not being revisionist, I never have done.

Probably worth mentioning both Hull and Norwich have spent more than us on transfers this season.

And probably substantially less on overall wages.

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29211
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2483 on: March 28, 2014, 11:07:39 PM »
I think that Lambert's strong points are finding unlikely pearls in the gooey oysters of the lesser leagues, galvanising young players for big games, and reactive tactics, specifically counter-attacking and planning for the opposition's key players. His weaknesses I think I've gone into at amazingly tedious length elsewhere, but his strengths do deserve a mention, because I think too often both the pro- and anti-Lambert camps are guilty of failing to acknowledge the subtler points against their arguments.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2484 on: March 28, 2014, 11:08:01 PM »
I'm just deeply unconvinced that he's any good. I don't buy the fact that we're mid table being relevant when we're actually closer in terms of points difference to 20th than 9th. We might finish tenth at best, at worst we could be much lower. I don't buy the austerity/early days in a big project argument when we are only a point ahead of big spenders Hull and two ahead of Norwich.

I am genuinely interested to know what those who support Lambert see as his strong points. Tactics, motivation, talent spotting? I just can't see anything that good about him, and I'm not being revisionist, I never have done.

Probably worth mentioning both Hull and Norwich have spent more than us on transfers this season.

And probably substantially less on overall wages.
Not entirely sure about that. Our wage bill, for some reason, still appears to be quite high. Of course we've still got Given, Hutton, Zogbia, Bent and a few others to shift. Albrighton and Delfouneso are earning a fair wedge but will be out of contract.
Right now though I'd say our wage bill overall if probably significantly higher than both Norwich and Hull.

I'd be curious if some statto has the figures about where our wage bill ranks in the top flight at the moment.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30250
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2485 on: March 28, 2014, 11:10:19 PM »
Tactically he can be sometimes a little naïve and leave you scratching your head (Albrighton behind the strikers last week for one).

Online rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9659
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2486 on: March 28, 2014, 11:11:00 PM »
I'm just deeply unconvinced that he's any good. I don't buy the fact that we're mid table being relevant when we're actually closer in terms of points difference to 20th than 9th. We might finish tenth at best, at worst we could be much lower. I don't buy the austerity/early days in a big project argument when we are only a point ahead of big spenders Hull and two ahead of Norwich.

I am genuinely interested to know what those who support Lambert see as his strong points. Tactics, motivation, talent spotting? I just can't see anything that good about him, and I'm not being revisionist, I never have done.

Probably worth mentioning both Hull and Norwich have spent more than us on transfers this season.

And probably substantially less on overall wages.
Not entirely sure about that. Our wage bill, for some reason, still appears to be quite high. Of course we've still got Given, Hutton, Zogbia, Bent and a few others to shift. Albrighton and Delfouneso are earning a fair wedge but will be out of contract.
Right now though I'd say our wage bill overall if probably significantly higher than both Norwich and Hull.

I'd be curious if some statto has the figures about where our wage bill ranks in the top flight at the moment.

I'd suggest our overall wages are a lot more than Hull or Norwich. We have a £10m start on most clubs.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2487 on: March 28, 2014, 11:14:18 PM »
I'm just deeply unconvinced that he's any good. I don't buy the fact that we're mid table being relevant when we're actually closer in terms of points difference to 20th than 9th. We might finish tenth at best, at worst we could be much lower. I don't buy the austerity/early days in a big project argument when we are only a point ahead of big spenders Hull and two ahead of Norwich.

I am genuinely interested to know what those who support Lambert see as his strong points. Tactics, motivation, talent spotting? I just can't see anything that good about him, and I'm not being revisionist, I never have done.

Probably worth mentioning both Hull and Norwich have spent more than us on transfers this season.

And probably substantially less on overall wages.
Not entirely sure about that. Our wage bill, for some reason, still appears to be quite high. Of course we've still got Given, Hutton, Zogbia, Bent and a few others to shift. Albrighton and Delfouneso are earning a fair wedge but will be out of contract.
Right now though I'd say our wage bill overall if probably significantly higher than both Norwich and Hull.

I'd be curious if some statto has the figures about where our wage bill ranks in the top flight at the moment.

I'd suggest our overall wages are a lot more than Hull or Norwich. We have a £10m start on most clubs.
Sorry I misread what you'd written before sir. But yes. Undoubtedly, our wages are way more than Hull etc. That said we've been been in the Prem every season since it's inception (when it became all about money) so it'll take a fair while for some clubs to get parity with us as our wage bill drops and theirs rise.


Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74577
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2488 on: March 28, 2014, 11:32:59 PM »
The private jet is only a story because somebody found out about it. Had nobody known about the jet bit the story itself would never have become what it did. It would have been just about us meeting one of a number of potential managers for the club and we might have found about it or we might not have.

He was the first choice. Trust me on this one.   

So presumably he turned us down and then signed for a Cardiff team in utter disarray with a mad chairman. Bullet dodged indeed.

Except he didn't. He joined Cardiff a year later.

He expressed an interest in our job, was effusive when talking about it in the media, then the bloke who was funding Molde said "If you go now, I am pulling the plug entirely on the club".

I can understand him not taking our job under those circumstances. You make it sound like we interviewed him and he said "No, ta" then immediately went off to work for Vincent Tan.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74577
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: The Paul Lambert thread
« Reply #2489 on: March 28, 2014, 11:34:52 PM »
The private jet is only a story because somebody found out about it. Had nobody known about the jet bit the story itself would never have become what it did. It would have been just about us meeting one of a number of potential managers for the club and we might have found about it or we might not have.

He was the first choice. Trust me on this one.   

Bullet dodged.

I'm not too sure about that.

Things have gone very badly since he went there, but I think the major part of that situation is that he shouldn't have gone near that job. Poor judgement.

This probably sounds daft, but I am glad that they had the foresight or sense of adventure to think about making an appointment like that.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal