collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

All Time Worst XI by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 05:42:37 AM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 05:38:57 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Toronto Villa
[Today at 04:04:34 AM]


Roberto Olabe by Matt C
[Today at 03:16:46 AM]


Other Villa stuff by adrenachrome
[Today at 02:49:19 AM]


When Sunday comes - Leeds away by adrenachrome
[Today at 02:29:28 AM]


Boxing 2025 by dave.woodhall
[Today at 12:08:47 AM]


Dirty Leeds v Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by trinityoap
[November 22, 2025, 11:33:22 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: All Time Worst XI by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 05:42:37 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 05:38:57 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Toronto Villa
[Today at 04:04:34 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by cdbearsfan
[Today at 03:40:24 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 03:22:11 AM]


Re: Roberto Olabe by Matt C
[Today at 03:16:46 AM]


Re: Other Villa stuff by adrenachrome
[Today at 02:49:19 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Lsvilla
[Today at 02:32:30 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Paul Lambert thread - poll reset after our capitulation to Hull  (Read 1829108 times)

Offline Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 14389
  • Age: 55
  • Location: Telford
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #405 on: February 08, 2014, 10:53:03 PM »
So he's guided us to an 8-0 defeat and losses to sides from all 3 lower divisions but he doesn't get as much stick as McLeish for reasons like that? I used to think the Small Heath thing was a media lie but the longer people give Lambert such an easy ride the more I wonder.

Offline itbrvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 7443
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : 16.02.2022
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #406 on: February 08, 2014, 10:56:03 PM »
So he's guided us to an 8-0 defeat and losses to sides from all 3 lower divisions but he doesn't get as much stick as McLeish for reasons like that? I used to think the Small Heath thing was a media lie but the longer people give Lambert such an easy ride the more I wonder.
Great post.

Offline Californian Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 872
  • Location: Berkeley
    • Mustang 68
  • GM : Apr, 2012
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #407 on: February 08, 2014, 10:58:41 PM »
How much was it?

Around UKP 5 million I believe.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63860
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #408 on: February 08, 2014, 10:59:43 PM »

Offline Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30563
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #409 on: February 08, 2014, 11:00:25 PM »

Offline Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 14389
  • Age: 55
  • Location: Telford
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #410 on: February 08, 2014, 11:01:15 PM »
You could have bought Wigan Athletic for five million quid.

Offline Irish villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 8526
  • Age: 39
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #411 on: February 08, 2014, 11:02:51 PM »
Why climb Everest when you can look at the top from Google images?

The man can do what he wants, his prerogative. It takes more bottle to do the former of those activities though. The later contains infinitely less risk, but none of the glory.

Are you winding us up?

This whole 'Martinez lacked the bottle' argument being developed is so irrelevant.  How many good managers would have taken a job under those circumstances? It goes back to the peanuts and monkeys argument. Bottle doesn't come into it. if I turn down a job that won't get me to where I want to be in my career, i.e successful, it's not because I lack bottle. It's because I know a job with better working conditions would be worth the wait.

Offline Californian Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 872
  • Location: Berkeley
    • Mustang 68
  • GM : Apr, 2012
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #412 on: February 08, 2014, 11:05:16 PM »

Offline Californian Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 872
  • Location: Berkeley
    • Mustang 68
  • GM : Apr, 2012
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #413 on: February 08, 2014, 11:07:32 PM »
How much was it?

Around UKP 5 million I believe.

I doubt it was that much.

If it was much less, Villa would have paid it. They paid around UKP 3 million for TSM!

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 43726
  • Location: 1455 3rd Street Salad Bar
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #414 on: February 08, 2014, 11:09:04 PM »
It takes bottle and ego to believe you have it within you to sort out and put Aston Villa back to where it's historically accustomed to being, when he situation financially is unique amongst all 20 clubs.

Not many could do it, maybe nobody can.  You wouldn't take it because you lack bottle and self belief. Maybe Martinez did too? Or maybe it's because we wouldn't pay the mythical £5 million? It's all history now.

Offline Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30563
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #415 on: February 08, 2014, 11:09:22 PM »
How much was it?

Around UKP 5 million I believe.

I doubt it was that much.

If it was much less, Villa would have paid it. They paid around UKP 3 million for TSM!

Maybe he didn't want to come, which was probably the main reason. It's not always about money.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 43726
  • Location: 1455 3rd Street Salad Bar
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #416 on: February 08, 2014, 11:11:04 PM »
It's a hard job to take on. I don't blame him for protecting his image/brand by taking an easier job.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63860
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #417 on: February 08, 2014, 11:11:41 PM »

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29686
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #418 on: February 08, 2014, 11:13:12 PM »
'He lacked the bottle' seems to me a euphemism for 'we didn't make a good enough offer'. I'm sure he lacked the bottle to try and take Rochdale to the Champions' League as well.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 43726
  • Location: 1455 3rd Street Salad Bar
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Lambert new contract
« Reply #419 on: February 08, 2014, 11:18:25 PM »
You've got one of the biggest clubs in the country, but you have to get all Geroge Osbourne on it for at least two seasons and cut to the bone. Tempting and terrifying. O'Neill certainly lacked the bottle, maybe I am being harsh on Martinez.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal