Quote from: rob_bridge on January 14, 2014, 09:37:39 PMSorry had to work a bit late.In response to the earlier exchange (Dave W and Toronto) I could see Doug's reasoning (wrong as it turned out) in hiring possibly the next bright thing in Turner. Someone on the way up. Howard Kendall, SGT, Redknapp and David Pleat were a new brand of managers who had impressed around this time and guess he thought he could poach him with minimum fuss. Not sacking him in summer 1986 was a worse decision.I could even see the switch to someone with extensive experience and an exceptional playing career and McNeill was one of Scottish football's all time greats when they were good. He was the worse appointment of them all - even worse than TSM. However, I could never see the reasoning behind Houllier (and Lacky) or McLeish in the 2nd decade of 20th century for different reasons. It would have been probably different if either had been hired 10-15 years earlier. The botched approach for Martinez and Whelan - say what you like about him - making Villa look like a bunch of amateurs and he was right. McLeish prior to running down the engine at Rangers had an impressive record. However hiring someone based on a reference from a 'legendary' manager in charge of a superior competitor and making it public is a further embarassment to behold. I could understand the hiring of Lambert for sure. I was one who thought the best practical available option. I am still bemused about the overt courting of OGS in such a public way prior to Lambert's appointment. Another Fergie accolyte potentially. The upshot is as and when Lambert's replacement is hired, Herbert won't be involved, Faulkner will be as things currently stand. I'd rather he wasn't. Therefore, I hope for everyone concerned at Villa we want that to be a good few years away - for multiple reasons.We'll never know how Houllier would have worked out - there's evidence on both sides but I would like to have seen what would have happened had he been able to bring in his first (or second) choice no. 2.The managers you mentioned as bright young things in 1984 were a different situation to Turner. Sir Graham and Pleat had joined their clubs when they were in the lower divisions and worked their way up with them. Kendall was already a Goodison legend and had joined Everton when they were at a low ebb - think of Brian Little in 1994 for a similar scenario. Redknapp was at the start of his decade with Bournemouth. None of them had gone to a club that was massively in excess of anything they'd done before; as someone said the other day, it was like putting Dean Smith in charge of Chelsea, then within a few weeks he'd stuck John Terry at right-back and told him and Frank Lampard they were finished.
Sorry had to work a bit late.In response to the earlier exchange (Dave W and Toronto) I could see Doug's reasoning (wrong as it turned out) in hiring possibly the next bright thing in Turner. Someone on the way up. Howard Kendall, SGT, Redknapp and David Pleat were a new brand of managers who had impressed around this time and guess he thought he could poach him with minimum fuss. Not sacking him in summer 1986 was a worse decision.I could even see the switch to someone with extensive experience and an exceptional playing career and McNeill was one of Scottish football's all time greats when they were good. He was the worse appointment of them all - even worse than TSM. However, I could never see the reasoning behind Houllier (and Lacky) or McLeish in the 2nd decade of 20th century for different reasons. It would have been probably different if either had been hired 10-15 years earlier. The botched approach for Martinez and Whelan - say what you like about him - making Villa look like a bunch of amateurs and he was right. McLeish prior to running down the engine at Rangers had an impressive record. However hiring someone based on a reference from a 'legendary' manager in charge of a superior competitor and making it public is a further embarassment to behold. I could understand the hiring of Lambert for sure. I was one who thought the best practical available option. I am still bemused about the overt courting of OGS in such a public way prior to Lambert's appointment. Another Fergie accolyte potentially. The upshot is as and when Lambert's replacement is hired, Herbert won't be involved, Faulkner will be as things currently stand. I'd rather he wasn't. Therefore, I hope for everyone concerned at Villa we want that to be a good few years away - for multiple reasons.
Three league titles and four cups would indicate a decent manager no matter what the media say.Those managers you held up were totally different to Turner and at totally different clubs. You can't compare them with him. And it's a strange relegation scrap when you're eleventh with half the season left.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2014, 11:14:20 PMThree league titles and four cups would indicate a decent manager no matter what the media say.Those managers you held up were totally different to Turner and at totally different clubs. You can't compare them with him. And it's a strange relegation scrap when you're eleventh with half the season left. It feels like a relegation scrap. We're only 5 points above the drop zone after all.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on January 15, 2014, 12:11:33 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2014, 11:14:20 PMThree league titles and four cups would indicate a decent manager no matter what the media say.Those managers you held up were totally different to Turner and at totally different clubs. You can't compare them with him. And it's a strange relegation scrap when you're eleventh with half the season left. It feels like a relegation scrap. We're only 5 points above the drop zone after all. Life is what you make it. We're no points from midtable.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on January 15, 2014, 12:31:50 AMQuote from: saunders_heroes on January 15, 2014, 12:11:33 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2014, 11:14:20 PMThree league titles and four cups would indicate a decent manager no matter what the media say.Those managers you held up were totally different to Turner and at totally different clubs. You can't compare them with him. And it's a strange relegation scrap when you're eleventh with half the season left. It feels like a relegation scrap. We're only 5 points above the drop zone after all. Life is what you make it. We're no points from midtable.It's the home form that makes to feel like a relegation battle. It's horrific
Quote from: saunders_heroes on January 15, 2014, 12:36:35 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on January 15, 2014, 12:31:50 AMQuote from: saunders_heroes on January 15, 2014, 12:11:33 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2014, 11:14:20 PMThree league titles and four cups would indicate a decent manager no matter what the media say.Those managers you held up were totally different to Turner and at totally different clubs. You can't compare them with him. And it's a strange relegation scrap when you're eleventh with half the season left. It feels like a relegation scrap. We're only 5 points above the drop zone after all. Life is what you make it. We're no points from midtable.It's the home form that makes to feel like a relegation battle. It's horrific I think this sums up some of our problems. Dave is quite right, we're mid table and, actually, 5 points should feel like a bit of a cushion when there are so many clubs in the mix. However, the poor home form, the lack of possession and the apparent lack of confidence all contribute to a feeling that we've ridden our luck and a lack of belief in our ability to move clear of the bottom three over the next few weeks rather than get sucked in.I suspect that the players feel that way too, and the lack of confidence and belief is self defeating. However Faulkner spins the stats, it must be utterly demoralising to lose week after week in front of your own fans. Especially if one of the teams you lose to is Crystal Palace.
Apparently the owner of Hull will "Quite literally just walk away". Which would be interesting. And also throw up quite a few questions.