27% possession at home against anyone is completely unacceptable. Anyone saying that the fact they didn't produce much is missing the point. At home you need to be able to stamp your authority on the game and if you don't you'll lose most games. Our possession stats at home are a massive reason as to why we've for terrible results.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on December 29, 2013, 12:01:56 PM27% possession at home against anyone is completely unacceptable. Anyone saying that the fact they didn't produce much is missing the point. At home you need to be able to stamp your authority on the game and if you don't you'll lose most games. Our possession stats at home are a massive reason as to why we've for terrible results.Yet we had more possession against Palace and came away with zero points. Too much store is put by these stats, for a start I am not convinced you can take their accuracy at face value and they really only tell part of the story.
Take a look at the reports on the BBC website for Swansea's games, they have had more possession in every game I've loked at so far, including games at Man Utd, Chelsea and Man City. That's how they play.27% is bad, but we were never going to out-possess Swansea if the likes of the above can't do it on their patch are we?
I wonder if it's a confidence issue as well, where you have players so scared of giving the ball away they're just taking the easier option and passing it back to Clark/Baker/Guzan, who then inevitably boot it upfield and back to the opposition.
The crowd are awful. It was like a pantomime wih all the booing and whinning.
Absolutely astonished people do not see a problem with 27% possession. That's forgetting we are at home and against a mid table side.