collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: and then who?  (Read 72367 times)

Online JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34711
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: and then who?
« Reply #225 on: December 27, 2013, 12:59:02 PM »
Hoddle

raring to go - gagging for a job - Villa be great name for him and possible to get

12 month contract - sort this mess out and then we will talk again .

good bloody coach , which we havent got now ,

Hoddle is a c***.

Massive ego. Fucked up the Wolves. Has weird beliefs about disabled people. Didn't exactly do a great job at his beloved Spurs. Is a shit man manager. Massive no for me.

Dont know the bloke at all ,  but understand your feelings . Trying to think of a manager we could get , we re Aston Villa but its getting a struggle now to get a decent one in .

Be great if we can find that Soton type manager some where


Diego Pablo Simeone   then ;)


Offline BoskoDjembaSalifou

  • Member
  • Posts: 924
  • BoskoDjembaSalifou
Re: and then who?
« Reply #226 on: December 27, 2013, 01:01:07 PM »
I'd like Bielsa. I think he'd take it too.
Why do you think that?

He was apparently interested in the Ireland job and has also said he's not motivated by the money, which would appeal to Lerner. It's worth a shot.

Offline sirlordbaltimore

  • Member
  • Posts: 2847
Re: and then who?
« Reply #227 on: December 27, 2013, 01:01:13 PM »

Glenn Hoddle talks a good game (but so does Graeme Souness) but what has he ever done as a manager to suggest he can be a good one ?

He's always struck me as one of those blokes that would get frustrated if a player couldn't do what he could. And that's no good as a manager. The hardest job is getting those players that aren't quite as gifted to raise their game and believe they can be as vital part of the team as the naturally gifted players

He's not the man to do that IMHO. And then we've got the whole Acorns debate and his well known 'views' on the subject.


Maybe we need to give Fergie a call and see if he fancies a Father & Son type deal with OGS. Fergie upstairs directing and OGS in the trenches. Yeah, fucking likely

Online JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34711
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: and then who?
« Reply #228 on: December 27, 2013, 01:01:44 PM »
I wanted Lambert and look whats happened

I know nothing about managers

Offline TonyD

  • Member
  • Posts: 10416
  • Location: Outside the box
Re: and then who?
« Reply #229 on: December 27, 2013, 01:11:51 PM »
Hoddle would be a disaster.   OGS gets my vote. 

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: and then who?
« Reply #230 on: December 27, 2013, 01:15:19 PM »
It is interesting that the one person nobody seems to want is Big Sam. Because nobody will convince me that he wouldn't get more out of our players than Lambert is getting at the moment. That is what he does. Gets results out of turning a sow's ear into a more organised sow's ear. And a sow's ear is what our squad is.

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 10873
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: and then who?
« Reply #231 on: December 27, 2013, 01:18:55 PM »
I'd like Bielsa. I think he'd take it too.
Why do you think that?

He's out of work is probably the biggest reason, whereas his wiki suggests he has always worked previously.

I was in the Basque region when Bilbao reported back to training and he was having an almighty spat with the club because the training ground was not ready.  He stormed off and caused all sorts of nuisance.  I'd imagine this contributed to him not having his contract renewed at the beginning of this year.

You cannot fault his commitment to management but he is VERY demanding.  He'd either drag the club up by the scruff of it's neck or it'd end in absolute disaster. 

Personally I'd love him and another younger man to come in.  Bielsa could slowly become a director of football ensuring that his footballing philosophy is employed at all levels of the club.  The younger guy - Laursen? - taking in the day to day duties.  The tricky bit would be finding a man who would comply wit Bielsa's madness.

Online lovejoy

  • Member
  • Posts: 9648
  • Location: Haywards Heath
Re: and then who?
« Reply #232 on: December 27, 2013, 01:21:59 PM »
We can't keep changing managers every 2 years or we will spend the rest of our lives 'in transition'. This is a misnomer anyway, transition suggests you are getting somewhere.

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: and then who?
« Reply #233 on: December 27, 2013, 01:28:39 PM »
I'd like Bielsa. I think he'd take it too.
Why do you think that?

He's out of work is probably the biggest reason, whereas his wiki suggests he has always worked previously.

I was in the Basque region when Bilbao reported back to training and he was having an almighty spat with the club because the training ground was not ready.  He stormed off and caused all sorts of nuisance.  I'd imagine this contributed to him not having his contract renewed at the beginning of this year.

You cannot fault his commitment to management but he is VERY demanding.  He'd either drag the club up by the scruff of it's neck or it'd end in absolute disaster. 

Personally I'd love him and another younger man to come in.  Bielsa could slowly become a director of football ensuring that his footballing philosophy is employed at all levels of the club.  The younger guy - Laursen? - taking in the day to day duties.  The tricky bit would be finding a man who would comply wit Bielsa's madness.

If sanity is what I've been watching at Villa Park since Lambert took over I will take madness.

Online john e

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20693
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: and then who?
« Reply #234 on: December 27, 2013, 01:29:51 PM »
It is interesting that the one person nobody seems to want is Big Sam. Because nobody will convince me that he wouldn't get more out of our players than Lambert is getting at the moment. That is what he does. Gets results out of turning a sow's ear into a more organised sow's ear. And a sow's ear is what our squad is.


you do know that Big Sams West Ham are below us in the league and are in fact in the bottom three,
 so whatever he's getting out of his squad down there after spending more than Lambert isn't what we want at VP

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: and then who?
« Reply #235 on: December 27, 2013, 01:34:52 PM »
It is interesting that the one person nobody seems to want is Big Sam. Because nobody will convince me that he wouldn't get more out of our players than Lambert is getting at the moment. That is what he does. Gets results out of turning a sow's ear into a more organised sow's ear. And a sow's ear is what our squad is.


you do know that Big Sams West Ham are below us in the league and are in fact in the bottom three,
 so whatever he's getting out of his squad down there after spending more than Lambert isn't what we want at VP

He messed up by putting nearly all of his budget into signing Carroll who then got injured. He took a gamble which has so far backfired. He never took Bolton, Blackburn or Newcastle down, others did. He will keep West Ham up and would keep us up. I'm not saying I would be delighted to have him but he keeps teams up and anyone who thinks we are not right back into that scenario of just making sure we stay up is deluded at the moment.

Offline avfc_1874

  • Member
  • Posts: 1617
Re: and then who?
« Reply #236 on: December 27, 2013, 01:36:09 PM »
It is interesting that the one person nobody seems to want is Big Sam. Because nobody will convince me that he wouldn't get more out of our players than Lambert is getting at the moment. That is what he does. Gets results out of turning a sow's ear into a more organised sow's ear. And a sow's ear is what our squad is.


you do know that Big Sams West Ham are below us in the league and are in fact in the bottom three,
 so whatever he's getting out of his squad down there after spending more than Lambert isn't what we want at VP


A lot of their fans want him out as well. He only really has a bit of backing for beating Spurs in the league & cup.

Offline Singapore Villa

  • Member
  • Posts: 1007
  • Location: Singapore (how did u guess?)
  • GM : 09.06.2019
Re: and then who?
« Reply #237 on: December 27, 2013, 01:39:21 PM »
Allardyce?  Please, please no.  Anyway, Lambert is going nowhere, so hold onto your hats and get ready for another relegation fight.

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: and then who?
« Reply #238 on: December 27, 2013, 01:40:54 PM »
They never wanted him. They wanted someone who plays the West Ham way. Like John Lyall, who won them two FA cups in twenty years but also got them relegated twice.

Online JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34711
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: and then who?
« Reply #239 on: December 27, 2013, 01:41:41 PM »
McKay sacked

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal