I genuinely couldn't care less, it'd still be Villa Park to me and anyone else interested in football. Just as the NEC is still the NEC not the LG Arena, Bescot Stadium is still Bescot Stadum and so on and so onYou can't change peoples mindset just by sticking a new sign up on an old building and expect people to start calling it something new.
I don't care how much money we're offered, I'd never be comfortable with a Villa Park name change. It would be different if we were to move to a new stadium as they'd be very little emotional attachment to it, but Villa Park is in our hearts and minds and is simply not for sale.
How much would it take for us to make a realistic challenge for top 4 again? £200 million? £300 million? Maybe even closer to £500 million, when you factor in wages (we'd need to pay above the going rate to give ourselves a chance of getting the better players to opt for us).There is a debate to be had if any form of sponsorship/ naming rights came close to those figures. It would still be a no for me, but I can see why others might go for it. However, £50 million wouldn't really go very far (as if to illustrate just how mental the game has gone).it's the equivalent of about two and a half transfer windows for us, taking our business over the past two summers into account.
Quote from: KevinGage on November 16, 2013, 07:29:24 PMHow much would it take for us to make a realistic challenge for top 4 again? £200 million? £300 million? Maybe even closer to £500 million, when you factor in wages (we'd need to pay above the going rate to give ourselves a chance of getting the better players to opt for us).There is a debate to be had if any form of sponsorship/ naming rights came close to those figures. It would still be a no for me, but I can see why others might go for it. However, £50 million wouldn't really go very far (as if to illustrate just how mental the game has gone).it's the equivalent of about two and a half transfer windows for us, taking our business over the past two summers into account. True but the original question did say would you be prepared to go down that route if it meant winning the European cup and premiership title -in which case definately yes.
Quote from: eastie on November 16, 2013, 07:44:49 PMQuote from: KevinGage on November 16, 2013, 07:29:24 PMHow much would it take for us to make a realistic challenge for top 4 again? £200 million? £300 million? Maybe even closer to £500 million, when you factor in wages (we'd need to pay above the going rate to give ourselves a chance of getting the better players to opt for us).There is a debate to be had if any form of sponsorship/ naming rights came close to those figures. It would still be a no for me, but I can see why others might go for it. However, £50 million wouldn't really go very far (as if to illustrate just how mental the game has gone).it's the equivalent of about two and a half transfer windows for us, taking our business over the past two summers into account. True but the original question did say would you be prepared to go down that route if it meant winning the European cup and premiership title -in which case definately yes.I see Citehs' success as totally empty. I don't feel envy in the slightest, and I know I'd feel the same if it were us.
Seeing my club sold as a marketing vehicle for the likes of Mansoor, or a vanity project at the whim of an oligarch, would probably be the end for me.
Quote from: LeeB on November 16, 2013, 08:35:01 PMSeeing my club sold as a marketing vehicle for the likes of Mansoor, or a vanity project at the whim of an oligarch, would probably be the end for me.To be fair to Mansoor, they've actually proved to be pretty good owners. They do decent work in the community in that part of Manchester, and don't seem like a bunch of fly by night shysters.
The first two paragraphs should act as a warning/reminder of what challenging at the top would entail.http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2013/nov/16/manchester-fc-united-different-world?CMP=twt_gu