Quote from: pauliewalnuts on September 16, 2014, 11:23:11 PMQuote from: jeowje on September 16, 2014, 11:21:30 PMNew contracts being signed/offered left, right and centre coupled with the signings and financial committments associated with Cleverley and Sanchez would suggest that something in the background has changed more dramatically than merely appointing a new ceo perhaps?I don't think so.Let's not forget, we've just spent 7m in the summer transfer window. That's not the sign of an enormous investment in the club, nor is offering new contracts to our best players.Thank God for the 'new owner' otherwise it would've been 3.5m
Quote from: jeowje on September 16, 2014, 11:21:30 PMNew contracts being signed/offered left, right and centre coupled with the signings and financial committments associated with Cleverley and Sanchez would suggest that something in the background has changed more dramatically than merely appointing a new ceo perhaps?I don't think so.Let's not forget, we've just spent 7m in the summer transfer window. That's not the sign of an enormous investment in the club, nor is offering new contracts to our best players.
New contracts being signed/offered left, right and centre coupled with the signings and financial committments associated with Cleverley and Sanchez would suggest that something in the background has changed more dramatically than merely appointing a new ceo perhaps?
Maybe, but 'ok' is a million times better than Lowton and Bacuna defensively.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on September 17, 2014, 09:49:34 PMMaybe, but 'ok' is a million times better than Lowton and Bacuna defensively. Trouble is, to replace a full back that is actually "ok" defensively with one who is actually "good" defensively would cost about 12 million now. Why not stick with the mid table level one we have until the rest of the side is at a point where that looks weak. I doubt, in the next 3 years, that will happen. This, thus far.
Would have offered a twelve month deal. I think he's half-decent but little more and only likely to decline at this point. If he's our first choice right back in 3 years I presume things will have gone even more to seed at the club.
Reading some of the comments on here you would think Hutton has miraculously transformed into Lahm and Zabaleta combined. He has been ok nothing more. 3 year deal is silly.
In the Telegraph it says it is an incentivised deal.
Quote from: olaftab on September 17, 2014, 09:48:28 PMReading some of the comments on here you would think Hutton has miraculously transformed into Lahm and Zabaleta combined. He has been ok nothing more. 3 year deal is silly.But not as silly as offering serial underachiever Agbonlahor an even longer contract.
Not so sure about this one. He plays 4 great games and gets immediately a 3 year extension..