Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 16, 2014, 11:19:35 PMQuote from: brontebilly on September 16, 2014, 11:17:53 PMbonkers deal, fair play to Hutton but 12 month extension would have been more than sufficient.Which he would have probably turned down and gone somewhere else.and?If we are to be anyway competitive as a football club we will need a better full back than the re-packaged Alan Hutton.
Quote from: brontebilly on September 16, 2014, 11:17:53 PMbonkers deal, fair play to Hutton but 12 month extension would have been more than sufficient.Which he would have probably turned down and gone somewhere else.
bonkers deal, fair play to Hutton but 12 month extension would have been more than sufficient.
Quote from: rob_bridge on September 17, 2014, 11:09:31 AMAlso does anyone ITK know how much his original deal was worth v the new deal?Same goes for Gabby - does anyone have a decent idea?I'd guess the money has stayed the same, and it's the length of the deals that were the bigger selling point. I don't think, certainly in Huttons case, we'd have upped the pay. Gabby must be on a fair bit too, so I think he's probably just maintained parity, which for 4 years is good going.
Also does anyone ITK know how much his original deal was worth v the new deal?Same goes for Gabby - does anyone have a decent idea?
Does the 3 years start from now, therefore including the current year he has left, so in fact it is only a 2 year extension?
I wonder if the owners of the club paid too much (i.e any) attention to the fan-forums. Hutton was the sort of player who after one bad game would get loads of comments saying he was the worst full-back ever to play for us and should never wear our shirt again. It doesn't seem as if Lambert and Hutton had a falling out, and trying to force him out hasn't saved us any money, so there must be another reason.
I think the shock for most is the turnaround in this story. I don't see an issue in him signing a new deal because he is playing at a very high level. It says a lot about an individual that despite being kicked in the balls he still had the professionalism to fight through it and come out better at the other end. I'm sure he also understands from his experiences in the past two years that there aren't that many suitors out there and he is possibly in the very best situation he could be at this stage in his career.
Hutton always maintained that Lambert was supportive of him even though he wasn't picking him. There is more to the whole era than has been told.
As long as he keeps performing on the pitch I don't mind him signing a new contract.
Quote from: jeowje on September 16, 2014, 11:21:30 PMNew contracts being signed/offered left, right and centre coupled with the signings and financial committments associated with Cleverley and Sanchez would suggest that something in the background has changed more dramatically than merely appointing a new ceo perhaps?I don't think so.Let's not forget, we've just spent 7m in the summer transfer window. That's not the sign of an enormous investment in the club, nor is offering new contracts to our best players.
New contracts being signed/offered left, right and centre coupled with the signings and financial committments associated with Cleverley and Sanchez would suggest that something in the background has changed more dramatically than merely appointing a new ceo perhaps?