They really do need to address the lack of English players playing in the top flight.
Quote from: Olof's Beard on August 28, 2014, 02:27:36 PMThey really do need to address the lack of English players playing in the top flight. They just need to train and develop better English players, regardless of where they are playing. Nathan Baker has been a Premier League player for three years now, it's not turned him into somebody good enough for International football. If the league is full of Nathan Bakers it's not going to make a jot of difference how good the England squad looks.
Quote from: Olof's Beard on August 28, 2014, 02:27:36 PMThey really do need to address the lack of English players playing in the top flight. They just need to train and develop better English players, regardless of where they are playing. Nathan Baker has been a Premier League player for three years now, it's not turned him into somebody good enough for International football. If the league is full of Nathan Bakers it's not going to make a jot of difference to how good the England squad looks.
Quote from: Dave on August 28, 2014, 03:45:39 PMQuote from: Olof's Beard on August 28, 2014, 02:27:36 PMThey really do need to address the lack of English players playing in the top flight. They just need to train and develop better English players, regardless of where they are playing. Nathan Baker has been a Premier League player for three years now, it's not turned him into somebody good enough for International football. If the league is full of Nathan Bakers it's not going to make a jot of difference how good the England squad looks.Disagree. England have been able to produce players that hold their own at intenrational, and often get close to winning things, up to the U-19, 20 and 21 levels. it's after that that there are problems. That suggests that the coaching and development is there up to the late teens and early 20s. Obviously the lack of space for ENglish players in Premier League teams is a problem but I think the biggest problem is British football culture.Our type of football is 100 miles an hour. Whether you are the most adept skillful player or not anyone would struggle with their technique if for 90 minutes you can never slow the game down and look for a pass. The reason our league is advocated as being the best is because of the excitement levels for the armchair fan. Technique goes out of the window to a large extent as the urge to press and get the ball forward is ever growing.And that's down to the fans. If we pass the ball 30 or 40 times but keep possession the crowd would start to get restless. That it ends up in the back of the net wouldn't be recognised until it happens. That the team may be keeping possession looking for a gap, a chink, a weak link before pushing to goal is seen as an alien concept and 'get on with it' is more common place than enjoying the possession and waiting for the chance to avail of itself. We can't have it both ways. We either develop technique but sacrifice 100 mph football or we stay with our exciting league and accept that the technique of a player will be compromised, and also that England will be lucky to progress deep into senior level competitions.
Quote from: peter w on August 28, 2014, 03:56:03 PMQuote from: Dave on August 28, 2014, 03:45:39 PMQuote from: Olof's Beard on August 28, 2014, 02:27:36 PMThey really do need to address the lack of English players playing in the top flight. They just need to train and develop better English players, regardless of where they are playing. Nathan Baker has been a Premier League player for three years now, it's not turned him into somebody good enough for International football. If the league is full of Nathan Bakers it's not going to make a jot of difference how good the England squad looks.Disagree. England have been able to produce players that hold their own at intenrational, and often get close to winning things, up to the U-19, 20 and 21 levels. it's after that that there are problems. That suggests that the coaching and development is there up to the late teens and early 20s. Obviously the lack of space for ENglish players in Premier League teams is a problem but I think the biggest problem is British football culture.Our type of football is 100 miles an hour. Whether you are the most adept skillful player or not anyone would struggle with their technique if for 90 minutes you can never slow the game down and look for a pass. The reason our league is advocated as being the best is because of the excitement levels for the armchair fan. Technique goes out of the window to a large extent as the urge to press and get the ball forward is ever growing.And that's down to the fans. If we pass the ball 30 or 40 times but keep possession the crowd would start to get restless. That it ends up in the back of the net wouldn't be recognised until it happens. That the team may be keeping possession looking for a gap, a chink, a weak link before pushing to goal is seen as an alien concept and 'get on with it' is more common place than enjoying the possession and waiting for the chance to avail of itself. We can't have it both ways. We either develop technique but sacrifice 100 mph football or we stay with our exciting league and accept that the technique of a player will be compromised, and also that England will be lucky to progress deep into senior level competitions.Players from abroad seem to come in and maintain their technical ability whilst abating the apparently restless crowds.