Quote from: Concrete John on November 07, 2013, 10:14:57 AMOur issues last season were shit defending ... The more fluid attacking we saw at the end of last season has been there, but more sporadically. Benteke's injury and Weimann's lack of form are really key reasons for this, so I'm both hopeful and expectant that we'll see better as the season settles down.The more fluid attackng came when we moved the ball more quickly; now, we seem to working at half-speed all the time, making our game very predictable. Injuries to Benteke and Gabby hav enot helped, nor has Weimann's poor form, as you say.
Our issues last season were shit defending ... The more fluid attacking we saw at the end of last season has been there, but more sporadically. Benteke's injury and Weimann's lack of form are really key reasons for this, so I'm both hopeful and expectant that we'll see better as the season settles down.
Quote from: Mister E on November 07, 2013, 01:27:01 PMQuote from: Concrete John on November 07, 2013, 10:14:57 AMOur issues last season were shit defending ... The more fluid attacking we saw at the end of last season has been there, but more sporadically. Benteke's injury and Weimann's lack of form are really key reasons for this, so I'm both hopeful and expectant that we'll see better as the season settles down.The more fluid attackng came when we moved the ball more quickly; now, we seem to working at half-speed all the time, making our game very predictable. Injuries to Benteke and Gabby hav enot helped, nor has Weimann's poor form, as you say.I think we move the ball too fast once we get into the attacking third. Our only way of playing seems to be at 100mph. No one really stops to look up and use a bit of vision. It also doesn't help us because most of our midfield and attack have poor first touches. We've just not got that balance yet and closing off the wide areas too often limits our attacking avenues too. We need to get the ball into their half quicker because we dally too much at times, but be a bit more considered with it at times once we get to the final third. Players tend to rush passes and try and play at full pelt all the time and it breaks down to often. That is also inevitably when we then find ourselves become increasingly more reliant on bypassing the midfield entirely and hoofing the ball.What we lack in technique we have a decent amount of pace. I'd like to see us expand the pitch and counter quickly along the flanks a lot more. Essentially like we did under O Neill. For want of better quality midfielders we need to utilize our speed better and spread our play across the pitch more. We lack the guile and technical ability to break teams down through the middle. We give opposition fullbacks a far too easy time. And in actuality Tonev providing some width gave us a bit of joy in the first half against Everton.
Quote from: supertom on November 07, 2013, 02:47:12 PMQuote from: Mister E on November 07, 2013, 01:27:01 PMQuote from: Concrete John on November 07, 2013, 10:14:57 AMOur issues last season were shit defending ... The more fluid attacking we saw at the end of last season has been there, but more sporadically. Benteke's injury and Weimann's lack of form are really key reasons for this, so I'm both hopeful and expectant that we'll see better as the season settles down.The more fluid attackng came when we moved the ball more quickly; now, we seem to working at half-speed all the time, making our game very predictable. Injuries to Benteke and Gabby hav enot helped, nor has Weimann's poor form, as you say.I think we move the ball too fast once we get into the attacking third. Our only way of playing seems to be at 100mph. No one really stops to look up and use a bit of vision. It also doesn't help us because most of our midfield and attack have poor first touches. We've just not got that balance yet and closing off the wide areas too often limits our attacking avenues too. We need to get the ball into their half quicker because we dally too much at times, but be a bit more considered with it at times once we get to the final third. Players tend to rush passes and try and play at full pelt all the time and it breaks down to often. That is also inevitably when we then find ourselves become increasingly more reliant on bypassing the midfield entirely and hoofing the ball.What we lack in technique we have a decent amount of pace. I'd like to see us expand the pitch and counter quickly along the flanks a lot more. Essentially like we did under O Neill. For want of better quality midfielders we need to utilize our speed better and spread our play across the pitch more. We lack the guile and technical ability to break teams down through the middle. We give opposition fullbacks a far too easy time. And in actuality Tonev providing some width gave us a bit of joy in the first half against Everton.The width thing against Everton is a fallacy, Tonev's best work was when he came inside and played 1-2 touch passes, which is exactly what we should do in the narrower system we play. Width has it's place and is an option but reading on here you'd sometimes think that it's impossible to be successful without 2 wingers hugging the touchline.
Delph in front of Sylla and Westwood, with more licence to hit the box, is our best midfield combination
You're still getting bogged down by positions on a board, making the field 'wider' is useful as it makes the gaps between players bigger but being able to do something with that space is more important. Gabby and Weimann were perfectly adequate wide players for 4months at the end of last season and we had one of the best attacks in the league, it worked because our players were running good lines that we expected but defenders didn't. We need to get that chemistry back, once we do the lack of a winger is no longer important. An attacking midfield who spots the runs sooner and releases the ball sooner when the runs are made is far more important.
Quote from: Ads on November 07, 2013, 08:17:16 PMDelph in front of Sylla and Westwood, with more licence to hit the box, is our best midfield combination At this point I'd have to agree with you.