If Ballance plays then we'll play 4 bowlers and that won't be enough. I don't see them changing the top 6.
I agree with that team, I ope they don't go for Ballance ahead of Stokes, Stokes should get the rest of the series now to see if he can become the all rounder we need, one game and out would do him no good at all.
Quote from: paul_e on December 12, 2013, 04:18:20 PMI agree with that team, I ope they don't go for Ballance ahead of Stokes, Stokes should get the rest of the series now to see if he can become the all rounder we need, one game and out would do him no good at all.I agree it's too late to change the batting line up now, and I think overall Stokes acquitted himself pretty well. He bowled pretty well and with pace and his 28 in the second innings was gutsy and showed the right character. He has the talent and we've got to back him now we've picked him.
Well it suggests you want to lose it. This is the team I'd go for -CookCarberryRootKPBellStokesPriorBresnanBroadRankin/Swann(dependant how the pitch looks)Anderson
Quote from: PaulWinch again on December 12, 2013, 03:36:13 PMWell it suggests you want to lose it. This is the team I'd go for -CookCarberryRootKPBellStokesPriorBresnanBroadRankin/Swann(dependant how the pitch looks)AndersonI'd keep the same top five as you, but I'd move prior up to six, bat Bresnan at seven and then have Broad, Anderson, Finn / Rankin and Monty. Can't see too many changes being made though. Think it will be a case of giving the tried and tested "one more chance" and they'll only go for big changes if we go 3-0 down and the series has gone.
We are out of this series, big time. There will be no great come back from 2-0 down.