If we do opt for two spinners I'd be surprised if Stokes doesn't bat 6, just because it's a lot of pressure on two seamers.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on December 04, 2013, 08:54:21 AMIf we do opt for two spinners I'd be surprised if Stokes doesn't bat 6, just because it's a lot of pressure on two seamers.Or prior at 6 and Bresnan at 7 ?
Quote from: eastie on December 04, 2013, 10:53:21 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on December 04, 2013, 08:54:21 AMIf we do opt for two spinners I'd be surprised if Stokes doesn't bat 6, just because it's a lot of pressure on two seamers.Or prior at 6 and Bresnan at 7 ?That would be my thinking if we want to fit Monty in we really need an extra bowler because we don't have any part timer who can come in and bowl even medium pacers with any consistency. This was another value Collingwood provided, he could tie up one end for a few overs here and there, without being smashed out of the ground.
Quote from: eastie on December 04, 2013, 10:53:21 AMQuote from: PaulWinch again on December 04, 2013, 08:54:21 AMIf we do opt for two spinners I'd be surprised if Stokes doesn't bat 6, just because it's a lot of pressure on two seamers.Or prior at 6 and Bresnan at 7 ?Prior's woeful form in no way should see him promoted up the order.