collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 07:15:13 AM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by Villan For Life
[Today at 06:36:43 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 05:17:02 AM]


Games Moved for TV by ChicagoLion
[Today at 04:27:15 AM]


Squad 25/26 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 04:19:42 AM]


Unai Emery by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:49:39 AM]


Brentford v Aston Villa Pre Match Thread. by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:46:14 AM]


Emi Martinez by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:59:02 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Dan Crowley  (Read 53217 times)

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75997
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #135 on: May 15, 2013, 06:20:35 PM »
We poached Carruthers from Arsenal when he was 16. It happens.

Wanting a statement from the club is a tad OTT.

Offline cheltenhamlion

  • Member
  • Posts: 18734
  • Location: Pedmore, Stourbridge
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #136 on: May 15, 2013, 06:27:56 PM »
Agreed, although I am somewhat perplexed that someone who doesn't support any club is taking the moral high ground with us?

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58577
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #137 on: May 15, 2013, 06:53:50 PM »

I would like the club to make a statement on this issue

You are joking right? None of us have any idea whatsoever whether this player will make it or not. You are a supporter of the club with one of the finest academies in Europe. I will guarantee you that not all of those players came from the Birmingham or local catchment area. We have done this to other clubs all will continue to do so in the future. It's not a big deal and only a fraction of any of these players ever completely fulfil their potential. There have been many young "stars" that never made it. Crowley may well be the exception to that rule, but certainly not something the club should making any kind of statement about.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31080
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #138 on: May 15, 2013, 06:58:28 PM »
The only thing I would like is more realistic compensation figures. So if a player is poached at 16, then big figures are paid for achievements later down the line up to 5-6 million not an arbitrary 1-2m. It might encourage clubs not to do it so much.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55155
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #139 on: May 15, 2013, 07:05:41 PM »
I personally amazed this thread has made 10 pages, let alone wanting a club statement.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63361
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #140 on: May 15, 2013, 08:09:59 PM »
That club statement in full:

"A 15 year old doesn't want to be in our gang anymore."

Offline Jenks

  • Member
  • Posts: 17
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #141 on: May 15, 2013, 11:26:09 PM »
The only thing I would like is more realistic compensation figures. So if a player is poached at 16, then big figures are paid for achievements later down the line up to 5-6 million not an arbitrary 1-2m. It might encourage clubs not to do it so much.

That essentially is the current situation. You get a fixed free for a player based on how long they've been at the club and what category academy the clubs has, then an additional £150k for every 10 Premier League appearances he makes, dropping down to £100k per 10 once he breaks the 60 mark. People slag the EPPP off compensation system off, but after a few seasons these figures will soon start adding up.


Agreed, although I am somewhat perplexed that someone who doesn't support any club is taking the moral high ground with us?

What does one have to do with the other?

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #142 on: May 15, 2013, 11:28:43 PM »
Mr Crowley. What went on in your head....

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75997
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #143 on: May 15, 2013, 11:41:57 PM »
I still don't see why he would choose to leave by far the best academy in the country. Even more so that he left for the 3rd biggest team in London. Even us and Millwall have looked more likely to win a trophy in recent times than them. I mean seriously, what is the point of Arsenal anymore? Soulless silent stadium filled with plastic, and I don't just mean the seats, never win anything, since RVP left they don't have a single player anyone cares about. Boring boring Arsenal indeed. Boring stadium, boring fans, boring players, boring manager.

Offline placeforparks

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2335
  • GM : PCM
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #144 on: May 16, 2013, 12:13:02 AM »
I would like the club to make a statement on this issue - I mean if we can't hold onto and develop our talent at 15 and in the youth team - what chance do we have holding them when they are 22 and just had a stellar season in the first team?

Arsenal like poaching young talent and I fear a brown paper bag may have changed hands.  Bribery never - inducements - benefits - expenses - of course.  Villa need to stand up here and fight - or what happens to our club when other lazy vultures start circling?

Tell us what is going on Villa - we need to keep our best talent.

errr, we poach young talent before they sign terms at the age of 16 as well. all clubs do it. we're talking about kids here, the law is there to protect them regardless if they play football or not.

it's a shame the lad has gone elsewhere, but i think it's obvious why they would appeal to him. fabregas joined arsenal at 16 as well, wilshere came through the ranks. 2 players i imagine he is trying to emulate.

if this wasn't getting press coverage, no one would give a shit. happens all the time. he may go onto be a brilliant player, he may join the likes of dean parrett, michael woods and tom taiwo. teenagers who were hyped up, attracted bitter disputes over compensation and ultimately ended up doing fuck all in the lower leagues.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31080
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #145 on: May 16, 2013, 12:15:02 AM »
The only thing I would like is more realistic compensation figures. So if a player is poached at 16, then big figures are paid for achievements later down the line up to 5-6 million not an arbitrary 1-2m. It might encourage clubs not to do it so much.

That essentially is the current situation. You get a fixed free for a player based on how long they've been at the club and what category academy the clubs has, then an additional £150k for every 10 Premier League appearances he makes, dropping down to £100k per 10 once he breaks the 60 mark. People slag the EPPP off compensation system off, but after a few seasons these figures will soon start adding up.


Agreed, although I am somewhat perplexed that someone who doesn't support any club is taking the moral high ground with us?

What does one have to do with the other?

And lets say he is the next Wilshire, and leaves for 30 million at 22. What do the club he has been engineered away from get of that?

Any young player going to arsenal needs to look at that Merida lad that all and sundry said was going to be better than Fabregas. Where is he now?

Offline Jenks

  • Member
  • Posts: 17
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #146 on: May 16, 2013, 02:52:49 PM »
Why look at Merida and not Fabregas himself? He left La Masia, probably the best academy in the world, and it hardly hurt his career. There's only so much an academy can do, much is up to the player. Crowley by all accounts has massive potential, and it's largely up to him to fulfil it. As for the money issues, well personally I think the rights of the matter should favour the child, not the club. In no other industry would it even be thinkable that kids should be bought and sold like commodities, let alone tolerated. You could argue that another club has bribed him, you could argue that Villa haven't done enough to make him feel like he's better off staying, but either way if it's a mistake then it should be his mistake to make.

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #147 on: May 16, 2013, 02:58:36 PM »
Why is la masia the best academy in the world? because they were lucky enough to have the same talent all coming through (roughly) at the same time. that's the players not the academy. And luck.

Offline ClaretAndBlueBlood

  • Member
  • Posts: 713
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #148 on: May 16, 2013, 03:11:58 PM »
Why look at Merida and not Fabregas himself? He left La Masia, probably the best academy in the world, and it hardly hurt his career. There's only so much an academy can do, much is up to the player. Crowley by all accounts has massive potential, and it's largely up to him to fulfil it. As for the money issues, well personally I think the rights of the matter should favour the child, not the club. In no other industry would it even be thinkable that kids should be bought and sold like commodities, let alone tolerated. You could argue that another club has bribed him, you could argue that Villa haven't done enough to make him feel like he's better off staying, but either way if it's a mistake then it should be his mistake to make.

totally agree with that

Offline ClaretAndBlueBlood

  • Member
  • Posts: 713
Re: Dan Crowley
« Reply #149 on: May 16, 2013, 03:12:31 PM »
Why is la masia the best academy in the world? because they were lucky enough to have the same talent all coming through (roughly) at the same time. that's the players not the academy. And luck.

you are joking right?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal