Quote from: Ron Manager on January 12, 2013, 07:04:37 PMI believe that Lambert will sleep on it overnight and if he knows already he's got very little money to play with and it appears reading between the lines that is the case he will tender his resignation.Which doesnt help in any way at all because the incoming candidate will be in the same position and will find improving the team a thanklesstask probably beyond him.Whose fault? Lambert's if Faulkner told him exactly what he could have in terms of finance when he accepted the positionor Lerners if he changed the goalposts(as Doug would have) as the season progressed.The only hope we have of escaping relegation is that Darren Bent is selected and goes on a scoring run which he is quite capable of doing.No other hope at all.Why would he resign and lose a pay off ? Maybe mutual consent could be trotted out though I guess.I
I believe that Lambert will sleep on it overnight and if he knows already he's got very little money to play with and it appears reading between the lines that is the case he will tender his resignation.Which doesnt help in any way at all because the incoming candidate will be in the same position and will find improving the team a thanklesstask probably beyond him.Whose fault? Lambert's if Faulkner told him exactly what he could have in terms of finance when he accepted the positionor Lerners if he changed the goalposts(as Doug would have) as the season progressed.The only hope we have of escaping relegation is that Darren Bent is selected and goes on a scoring run which he is quite capable of doing.No other hope at all.
Quote from: eastie on January 12, 2013, 07:12:24 PMQuote from: Ron Manager on January 12, 2013, 07:04:37 PMI believe that Lambert will sleep on it overnight and if he knows already he's got very little money to play with and it appears reading between the lines that is the case he will tender his resignation.Which doesnt help in any way at all because the incoming candidate will be in the same position and will find improving the team a thanklesstask probably beyond him.Whose fault? Lambert's if Faulkner told him exactly what he could have in terms of finance when he accepted the positionor Lerners if he changed the goalposts(as Doug would have) as the season progressed.The only hope we have of escaping relegation is that Darren Bent is selected and goes on a scoring run which he is quite capable of doing.No other hope at all.Why would he resign and lose a pay off ? Maybe mutual consent could be trotted out though I guess.ISince when has resigning meant you don't get compensation ?
Quote from: andyh on January 12, 2013, 07:23:05 PMQuote from: eastie on January 12, 2013, 07:12:24 PMQuote from: Ron Manager on January 12, 2013, 07:04:37 PMI believe that Lambert will sleep on it overnight and if he knows already he's got very little money to play with and it appears reading between the lines that is the case he will tender his resignation.Which doesnt help in any way at all because the incoming candidate will be in the same position and will find improving the team a thanklesstask probably beyond him.Whose fault? Lambert's if Faulkner told him exactly what he could have in terms of finance when he accepted the positionor Lerners if he changed the goalposts(as Doug would have) as the season progressed.The only hope we have of escaping relegation is that Darren Bent is selected and goes on a scoring run which he is quite capable of doing.No other hope at all.Why would he resign and lose a pay off ? Maybe mutual consent could be trotted out though I guess.ISince when has resigning meant you don't get compensation ?for ever
Quote from: hawkeye on January 12, 2013, 07:23:55 PMQuote from: andyh on January 12, 2013, 07:23:05 PMQuote from: eastie on January 12, 2013, 07:12:24 PMQuote from: Ron Manager on January 12, 2013, 07:04:37 PMI believe that Lambert will sleep on it overnight and if he knows already he's got very little money to play with and it appears reading between the lines that is the case he will tender his resignation.Which doesnt help in any way at all because the incoming candidate will be in the same position and will find improving the team a thanklesstask probably beyond him.Whose fault? Lambert's if Faulkner told him exactly what he could have in terms of finance when he accepted the positionor Lerners if he changed the goalposts(as Doug would have) as the season progressed.The only hope we have of escaping relegation is that Darren Bent is selected and goes on a scoring run which he is quite capable of doing.No other hope at all.Why would he resign and lose a pay off ? Maybe mutual consent could be trotted out though I guess.ISince when has resigning meant you don't get compensation ?for everSomebody had better tell MON then.
Quote from: curiousorange on January 12, 2013, 07:01:52 PMHere's a link to my match report for today: http://pickourteam.com/premierleague/aston-villa/fansverdict/12-01-2013/aston-villa-vs-southampton. As it seems to wind some up when I don't post the text here, i've done that as well, but if I can ask all of you a favour - can you click on the link and rate the players via the site (you can rate the manager and the ref too) as Sean and I are getting good numbers and people from here have played a part in that. Needless to say, feedback is appreciated:Aston Villa Match Report: Aston Villa 0 Southampton 1I'm sick of it. I'm sick of the same old tired themes. I'm impatient of shambolic defending, hacked off with unstructured midfield, dissatisfied with overcomplicated attacks and spitting fire with incompetent officials.I hate having my weekends ruined following a team with no desire, management with no tactical ability and an owner who must have a long-hidden vendetta against the club that's finally too overwhelming to rein in.Needless to say, Aston Villa lost again, and it was down to a combination of slapstick and the kind of luck you get when the world isn't finished with the joke. The situation's not even worrying: let's just assume we're going down, and hold a wake for the rest of the season.Today was the ideal opportunity to punt ourselves slightly ahead of the relegation pack and the pressure was too much. A great start went unrewarded and settled the game down in Southampton's favour, leaving them to exploit the space left by Villa's narrow midfield. Saints' full-backs were excellent and Jason Puncheon was a constant menace, but this is nothing new: it was the same when they thrashed us at St Mary's. Jay Rodriguez deserves a ban for his dive, which he won't get, but that'll be a footnote seven days from now.Villa did play energetically and saw a late flurry create a header for Nathan Baker that hit the bar, but for the majority of the game it was piecemeal and frustrating. In flashes there were pelting runs that excited the crowd but no end product.The amount of corners we had that didn't beat the first man was horrific, and Southampton picked up where Bradford City left off in terms of luck: they waited for Villa to retreat into the dark cloud that envelops the club and earned a relatively easy win. The fact that they didn't have to work for their winner was a welcome bonus.It was a better second-half performance but the same frailties are massively obvious: Villa are spirited yet limited. We're now back in the bottom three and 18 goals have been conceded in five league games. Somehow it feels like a script is being played out because all the elements are there: no confidence, no luck, little money for new players, no signings on the horizon, fans against the owner, people turning on the manager. This isn't Roy Of The Rovers, and in real life there are no eleventh hour heroes to come off the bench and save the day.Mathematically, there's a way to go before Aston Villa are out of touch. But there are no signs our luck might be changing. The imminent returns of more experienced players might surprise us all, but currently we're sliding out of the league with a whimper.Every corner Villa turn leads to a cul-de-sac, and if there were other options, the sack might be what Paul Lambert would get. But a key decision like that is no guarantee of a positive outcome, and results like today confirm when everything's against you, the only thing you get is nothing.please can some one tell me what is the point of this.If I want to read a badly written match report there are lots of other options.
Here's a link to my match report for today: http://pickourteam.com/premierleague/aston-villa/fansverdict/12-01-2013/aston-villa-vs-southampton. As it seems to wind some up when I don't post the text here, i've done that as well, but if I can ask all of you a favour - can you click on the link and rate the players via the site (you can rate the manager and the ref too) as Sean and I are getting good numbers and people from here have played a part in that. Needless to say, feedback is appreciated:Aston Villa Match Report: Aston Villa 0 Southampton 1I'm sick of it. I'm sick of the same old tired themes. I'm impatient of shambolic defending, hacked off with unstructured midfield, dissatisfied with overcomplicated attacks and spitting fire with incompetent officials.I hate having my weekends ruined following a team with no desire, management with no tactical ability and an owner who must have a long-hidden vendetta against the club that's finally too overwhelming to rein in.Needless to say, Aston Villa lost again, and it was down to a combination of slapstick and the kind of luck you get when the world isn't finished with the joke. The situation's not even worrying: let's just assume we're going down, and hold a wake for the rest of the season.Today was the ideal opportunity to punt ourselves slightly ahead of the relegation pack and the pressure was too much. A great start went unrewarded and settled the game down in Southampton's favour, leaving them to exploit the space left by Villa's narrow midfield. Saints' full-backs were excellent and Jason Puncheon was a constant menace, but this is nothing new: it was the same when they thrashed us at St Mary's. Jay Rodriguez deserves a ban for his dive, which he won't get, but that'll be a footnote seven days from now.Villa did play energetically and saw a late flurry create a header for Nathan Baker that hit the bar, but for the majority of the game it was piecemeal and frustrating. In flashes there were pelting runs that excited the crowd but no end product.The amount of corners we had that didn't beat the first man was horrific, and Southampton picked up where Bradford City left off in terms of luck: they waited for Villa to retreat into the dark cloud that envelops the club and earned a relatively easy win. The fact that they didn't have to work for their winner was a welcome bonus.It was a better second-half performance but the same frailties are massively obvious: Villa are spirited yet limited. We're now back in the bottom three and 18 goals have been conceded in five league games. Somehow it feels like a script is being played out because all the elements are there: no confidence, no luck, little money for new players, no signings on the horizon, fans against the owner, people turning on the manager. This isn't Roy Of The Rovers, and in real life there are no eleventh hour heroes to come off the bench and save the day.Mathematically, there's a way to go before Aston Villa are out of touch. But there are no signs our luck might be changing. The imminent returns of more experienced players might surprise us all, but currently we're sliding out of the league with a whimper.Every corner Villa turn leads to a cul-de-sac, and if there were other options, the sack might be what Paul Lambert would get. But a key decision like that is no guarantee of a positive outcome, and results like today confirm when everything's against you, the only thing you get is nothing.
Quote from: London Villan on January 12, 2013, 06:53:35 PMWhile Delph did ok today it was an insult to all the fans that went to Bradford on Tuesday to see the pairing of Delph and Bannan in the centre again today. It was actually Delph/Westwood today.
While Delph did ok today it was an insult to all the fans that went to Bradford on Tuesday to see the pairing of Delph and Bannan in the centre again today.
I never went today because of flu but I'm feeling a whole lot worse now.
Quote from: hawkeye on January 12, 2013, 07:09:37 PMQuote from: curiousorange on January 12, 2013, 07:01:52 PMHere's a link to my match report for today: http://pickourteam.com/premierleague/aston-villa/fansverdict/12-01-2013/aston-villa-vs-southampton. As it seems to wind some up when I don't post the text here, i've done that as well, but if I can ask all of you a favour - can you click on the link and rate the players via the site (you can rate the manager and the ref too) as Sean and I are getting good numbers and people from here have played a part in that. Needless to say, feedback is appreciated:Aston Villa Match Report: Aston Villa 0 Southampton 1I'm sick of it. I'm sick of the same old tired themes. I'm impatient of shambolic defending, hacked off with unstructured midfield, dissatisfied with overcomplicated attacks and spitting fire with incompetent officials.I hate having my weekends ruined following a team with no desire, management with no tactical ability and an owner who must have a long-hidden vendetta against the club that's finally too overwhelming to rein in.Needless to say, Aston Villa lost again, and it was down to a combination of slapstick and the kind of luck you get when the world isn't finished with the joke. The situation's not even worrying: let's just assume we're going down, and hold a wake for the rest of the season.Today was the ideal opportunity to punt ourselves slightly ahead of the relegation pack and the pressure was too much. A great start went unrewarded and settled the game down in Southampton's favour, leaving them to exploit the space left by Villa's narrow midfield. Saints' full-backs were excellent and Jason Puncheon was a constant menace, but this is nothing new: it was the same when they thrashed us at St Mary's. Jay Rodriguez deserves a ban for his dive, which he won't get, but that'll be a footnote seven days from now.Villa did play energetically and saw a late flurry create a header for Nathan Baker that hit the bar, but for the majority of the game it was piecemeal and frustrating. In flashes there were pelting runs that excited the crowd but no end product.The amount of corners we had that didn't beat the first man was horrific, and Southampton picked up where Bradford City left off in terms of luck: they waited for Villa to retreat into the dark cloud that envelops the club and earned a relatively easy win. The fact that they didn't have to work for their winner was a welcome bonus.It was a better second-half performance but the same frailties are massively obvious: Villa are spirited yet limited. We're now back in the bottom three and 18 goals have been conceded in five league games. Somehow it feels like a script is being played out because all the elements are there: no confidence, no luck, little money for new players, no signings on the horizon, fans against the owner, people turning on the manager. This isn't Roy Of The Rovers, and in real life there are no eleventh hour heroes to come off the bench and save the day.Mathematically, there's a way to go before Aston Villa are out of touch. But there are no signs our luck might be changing. The imminent returns of more experienced players might surprise us all, but currently we're sliding out of the league with a whimper.Every corner Villa turn leads to a cul-de-sac, and if there were other options, the sack might be what Paul Lambert would get. But a key decision like that is no guarantee of a positive outcome, and results like today confirm when everything's against you, the only thing you get is nothing.please can some one tell me what is the point of this.If I want to read a badly written match report there are lots of other options.You know what don't bother reading it then! Actually I think its pretty good and I appreciate the effort that someone has put into writing a report but I suppose some people just find it easier to criticise everything!
Here we go again sack the manager sack the manager sack the manager. I'ts no coincidence that the previous managers couldn't get it right either, how many managers do you want to sack before the penny drops that the manager may not be the problem. It's like this, the owner decides wages are far to high so decides to sell all our better players after all we have a great academy and the kids are going to be brilliant, we fill the side with reserve players then expect the manager to produce a quality team. Many of those kids are still in the team because the manager can't buy a whole team in six months. Do you seriously believe that Lambert can't see the problems? Lerner needs to back him or get out pure and simple.