Quote from: Chris Smith on August 15, 2014, 10:32:23 AMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on August 15, 2014, 09:59:55 AMQuote from: andyh on August 15, 2014, 09:42:42 AMI suppose the question is, does our club actually want to keep him ?If there is ANY truth in this, then it makes you wonder.http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-ron-vlaar-fit-7617366If that's the case then I reckon we've decided he can go.What possible reason is there for there not having been discussions? We have no Chief Exec might be one reason? I am guessing the decision making process is now a little more complex.We seem to be managing other signings though (sanchez supposedly). I'd have though retaining a player is 'easier' than bringing in a new one?
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on August 15, 2014, 09:59:55 AMQuote from: andyh on August 15, 2014, 09:42:42 AMI suppose the question is, does our club actually want to keep him ?If there is ANY truth in this, then it makes you wonder.http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-ron-vlaar-fit-7617366If that's the case then I reckon we've decided he can go.What possible reason is there for there not having been discussions? We have no Chief Exec might be one reason? I am guessing the decision making process is now a little more complex.
Quote from: andyh on August 15, 2014, 09:42:42 AMI suppose the question is, does our club actually want to keep him ?If there is ANY truth in this, then it makes you wonder.http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-ron-vlaar-fit-7617366If that's the case then I reckon we've decided he can go.What possible reason is there for there not having been discussions?
I suppose the question is, does our club actually want to keep him ?If there is ANY truth in this, then it makes you wonder.http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-ron-vlaar-fit-7617366
Quote from: PaulWinch again on August 15, 2014, 10:37:05 AMQuote from: brian green on August 15, 2014, 10:34:02 AMIf Southampton offer the same sort of silly money they did for Long I would bite their hands off. Baker and Clark will be nowhere near as aimless with some real men around them and the opposition getting snake eyes from the Irishman.If we ended up with Baker and Clark as our centre half pairing we'd go down. Baker in particular is nowhere near good enough. Why would that happen other than injuries?
Quote from: brian green on August 15, 2014, 10:34:02 AMIf Southampton offer the same sort of silly money they did for Long I would bite their hands off. Baker and Clark will be nowhere near as aimless with some real men around them and the opposition getting snake eyes from the Irishman.If we ended up with Baker and Clark as our centre half pairing we'd go down. Baker in particular is nowhere near good enough.
If Southampton offer the same sort of silly money they did for Long I would bite their hands off. Baker and Clark will be nowhere near as aimless with some real men around them and the opposition getting snake eyes from the Irishman.
Who exactly is doing the talks with potential signings and renewing contracts if we have no CEO ?
Quote from: sirlordbaltimore on August 15, 2014, 01:40:23 PMWho exactly is doing the talks with potential signings and renewing contracts if we have no CEO ?Robin Russell, presumably.
As far as we know there hasn't been a new contract offer for Delph, Gabby or Grealish (who I think is in his last year) either, so to me it looks like putting contract negotiations on hold until after the window is club policy at the moment.Its not the worst idea, as with the kind of inflated transfer fees going around at the minute any bid we did get for those players is likely to be fairly high so it makes a degree of sense to keep options open. I'd still be happier if we'd got them all signed up in May though.
If Yanited come calling we should bleed them dry . £20m.