Which confirms that we don't know the full facts.
I can't see the Southampton thing at all. They are a side that has pretty much just sold all of their best players to help clear their debts, after coming off a world cup where he has been lauded by all and sundry surely he would set his sights a little higher if looking for a move (which I am far from convinced is the case anyway).
I honestly think he will only leave for a truly better side and by that I mean a CL side or maybe manure if van gaal came calling. But we've said he isn't for sale.
Quote from: kippaxvilla2 on July 27, 2014, 10:44:03 AMI honestly think he will only leave for a truly better side and by that I mean a CL side or maybe manure if van gaal came calling. But we've said he isn't for sale.I think that's very naive . He'll leave for someone offering a great contract.
Lambert has also said that there has been no offers so far. I tend to think the Southampton link is lazy press based on the manager being Dutch, and them having sold/about to sell a centre back... Also I think they are closing in on a deal for a another defender?
Quote from: Gregorys Boy on July 27, 2014, 12:21:04 PMLambert has also said that there has been no offers so far. I tend to think the Southampton link is lazy press based on the manager being Dutch, and them having sold/about to sell a centre back... Also I think they are closing in on a deal for a another defender?Far be it from me to defend those lazy bastards in the media, but I think the link comes from their manager naming him as a possible replacement in a press conference.
This keeps getting rolled out like its a definitive answer and in some way an end to the debate. Whether you agree or not, there are still those of us who think the club have made a mistake in allowing Vlaar and Delph's contracts to run this far without being renewed. And if we're really expected to cut the club some slack because they were too busy dealing with the Culverhouse/Karsa fiasco, then we really are in a mess.