collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Posts

Re: John McGinn by Clampy
[Today at 03:02:24 PM]


Re: John McGinn by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 03:01:08 PM]


Re: John McGinn by Rory
[Today at 02:59:56 PM]


Re: John McGinn by Somniloquism
[Today at 02:58:55 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Somniloquism
[Today at 02:57:50 PM]


Re: John McGinn by Clampy
[Today at 02:56:31 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by cdbearsfan
[Today at 02:55:46 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Stu82
[Today at 02:54:16 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Concrete Ron  (Read 431799 times)

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42852
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #645 on: July 21, 2014, 12:07:55 PM »
That's because their forums are talking about it as if they already have signed him based on Koeman mentioning Vlaar's name in an interview in Holland.

Offline sirlordbaltimore

  • Member
  • Posts: 2846
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #646 on: July 21, 2014, 12:21:48 PM »
Vlaar is decent. Nothing special. Had more good games at the World Cup than he ever has at Villa. Not all his fault. Poor tactics and defensive partners don't help.

I'm pretty much in this camp. I like him, but he's no defensive great. If we got offered 10m then i'd be tempted to sell. But ONLY on the understanding that all of that could be spent on a replacement and not used to bring in another 3-4 cheap options to plug gaps

You only sell/replace your captain with someone better or there's not much point in selling him IMHO

Offline Surrey Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 636
  • Location: Now Malvern. Over The Hill. Must change my name?
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #647 on: July 21, 2014, 12:39:12 PM »
If Southampton have sold Lovren for £20m or whatever they will be desperate to replace him so we should demand the same for Vlaar! Even more from Man Utd.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31020
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #648 on: July 21, 2014, 12:45:26 PM »
I agree. We should be holding out for at the least 12 with ad ons this summer. Sell him and go down, and we will look very silly.

Offline Bottom Right 89

  • Member
  • Posts: 857
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #649 on: July 21, 2014, 01:55:08 PM »
I think someone needs to sit Koeman down and explain the order of things over here - they would be better off looking at our value range, Alan Hutton for example. The only thing they could offer RV over us are good ferry links with Holland.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30220
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #650 on: July 21, 2014, 02:18:38 PM »
If Southampton have sold Lovren for £20m or whatever they will be desperate to replace him so we should demand the same for Vlaar! Even more from Man Utd.


They need to replace several.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54898
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #651 on: July 21, 2014, 02:19:32 PM »
Keeping Vlaar and losing his next year for nothing, is much more important to us than selling for £4-5 million.

Offline Brend'Watkins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23165
  • Location: North Birmingham Clique teritory
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #652 on: July 21, 2014, 02:31:51 PM »
Southampton will struggle next year with or without Vlaar. 

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42852
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #653 on: July 21, 2014, 02:33:50 PM »
Southampton will struggle next year

I hope so.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37180
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #654 on: July 21, 2014, 02:41:58 PM »
Keeping Vlaar and losing his next year for nothing, is much more important to us than selling for £4-5 million.

Of course it is, that's what makes the stories like the QPR one so pathetic.  If someone offers silly money then fair enough but otherwise there just isn't the incentive for us to sell.

Offline Gregorys Boy

  • Member
  • Posts: 4812
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #655 on: July 21, 2014, 02:53:09 PM »
I am not against selling him, should we get a decent size offer, and if we have enough time to find a replacement before the start of the season.  But another thing you have to think off is that over the last two years he has been settling at Villa, and at least does know the other players in the back four or five?  If you replace him with someone else right before the start of the season then it may take a bit of time for them to build an understanding.

Either way, right now it looks like we have a better chance of staying up with Vlaar, so I say get one more year out of him at least.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Concrete Roneq
« Reply #656 on: July 21, 2014, 02:58:22 PM »
If a weasel like club such as QPR or indeed anyone throw big wages at Ron and we refuse to sell, we may have one pissed off player on our hands . All hypothetical of course but under these circumstances I would not expect the player to be pulling up too many trees over the coming season.

Offline Gregorys Boy

  • Member
  • Posts: 4812
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #657 on: July 21, 2014, 03:12:24 PM »
If a weasel like club such as QPR or indeed anyone throw big wages at Ron and we refuse to sell, we may have one pissed off player on our hands . All hypothetical of course but under these circumstances I would not expect the player to be pulling up too many trees over the coming season.

First of all it depends on the player, because some players such as Barry when he didn't get the move to Liverpool don't sulk, but just get on with their game.  Besides, Vlaar can leave in a year in any case, so I don't see the big deal.  Also, if he is looking for a move during his last year then it may motivate him more to impress other clubs.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74489
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #658 on: July 21, 2014, 03:13:47 PM »
With Vlaar, worth remembering that he is 29 now, if he gets a four year deal, whever it be, it is going to be his last big one, which is going to make him stop and think about what he does.

Offline sirlordbaltimore

  • Member
  • Posts: 2846
Re: Concrete Ron
« Reply #659 on: July 21, 2014, 03:39:29 PM »
Keeping Vlaar and losing his next year for nothing, is much more important to us than selling for £4-5 million.

You say that, but how are we going to replace him next summer if he walks on a free ?

It'd be a damn sight easier to replace him now for 8-10m than then for nothing if you ask me

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal