The rogers decision comes down to the way the request was made and probably should be handled by a prompt from the 3rd umpire. When it went for review the on-field will have stated what they gave it out for, the TV umpire should, in that situation, ask if they want to consider the lbw if there is no edge. By not asking the implied 'umpire's call' has to be that he wouldn't have given it out for lbw, meaning that the benefit of the doubt was with the batsman.This is another case where a dedicated TV umpire would be better suited than the current rotation process.
Quote from: paul_e on August 10, 2013, 01:05:58 PMThe rogers decision comes down to the way the request was made and probably should be handled by a prompt from the 3rd umpire. When it went for review the on-field will have stated what they gave it out for, the TV umpire should, in that situation, ask if they want to consider the lbw if there is no edge. By not asking the implied 'umpire's call' has to be that he wouldn't have given it out for lbw, meaning that the benefit of the doubt was with the batsman.This is another case where a dedicated TV umpire would be better suited than the current rotation process.I think the rule needs changing. Regardless of the original reason for being out, there should be absolute proof that giving a batsmen out was completely wrong in all aspects
Quote from: taylorsworkrate on August 10, 2013, 01:19:35 PMQuote from: paul_e on August 10, 2013, 01:05:58 PMThe rogers decision comes down to the way the request was made and probably should be handled by a prompt from the 3rd umpire. When it went for review the on-field will have stated what they gave it out for, the TV umpire should, in that situation, ask if they want to consider the lbw if there is no edge. By not asking the implied 'umpire's call' has to be that he wouldn't have given it out for lbw, meaning that the benefit of the doubt was with the batsman.This is another case where a dedicated TV umpire would be better suited than the current rotation process.I think the rule needs changing. Regardless of the original reason for being out, there should be absolute proof that giving a batsmen out was completely wrong in all aspectsI agree completely. Just explaining why it wasn't out, he was saved by a technicality.PWA - surely Bresnan deserves a little more than 18 balls before you make a statement like that.