collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by Rudy65
[Today at 10:04:38 PM]


FFP by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:03:50 PM]


Winter 25-26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by RamboandBruno
[Today at 10:03:29 PM]


Brian Green by Breezeblock
[Today at 09:56:42 PM]


Donyell Malen by algy
[Today at 09:27:36 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by The Edge
[Today at 09:27:00 PM]


The NFL Thread (with added College Football) by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 09:14:55 PM]


Brian Madjo by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 09:12:02 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Randy Lerner  (Read 176719 times)

Offline Rip Van We Go Again

  • Member
  • Posts: 26039
  • Location: Up and down, i'm up the wall, i'm up the bloody tree
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #660 on: January 25, 2013, 07:13:05 AM »
I read in the Post yesterday that Wanker was 3rd on the West Midlands 'Rich list'

Online Nev

  • Member
  • Posts: 16387
  • Location: Vibrania
  • GM : 03.02.2022
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #661 on: January 25, 2013, 07:29:18 AM »
Wrong thread. It's all gettting a but much this morning.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2013, 07:33:12 AM by Nev »

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30724
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #662 on: January 25, 2013, 09:09:38 AM »
I read in the Post yesterday that Wanker was 3rd on the West Midlands 'Rich list'

Is calling him 'wanker' really necessary?

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56946
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #663 on: January 25, 2013, 09:09:59 AM »
This is not particularly useful or mature but it's how I feel - Fuck off Lerner.

Offline Jarpie

  • Member
  • Posts: 581
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #664 on: January 25, 2013, 09:19:27 AM »
Who in here would trust Lerner to sell the club for good owner who knows what they are doing given his trackrecord on doing decisions? I bet he will sell the club for Paladini or someone like Venkys or who bought Portsmouth.

Offline Jon Crofts

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21848
  • Location: Breaking rocks in the hot sun
  • GM : PCM
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #665 on: January 25, 2013, 09:36:10 AM »
Jarpie, I doubt there will be any sale any time soon, the club is toxic, there is no market for an asset like a football club who's worth has fallen so significantly.
Like I said some time ago, Lerner bought a classic thoroghbred sports car & was trying to maintain it at Halfords, that strategy has ended & it's just been left to rot on his driveway under a tarpaulin now, an eyesore, an embarrasment to him & his neighbours.

Offline Rip Van We Go Again

  • Member
  • Posts: 26039
  • Location: Up and down, i'm up the wall, i'm up the bloody tree
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #666 on: January 25, 2013, 09:44:44 AM »
I read in the Post yesterday that Wanker was 3rd on the West Midlands 'Rich list'

Is calling him 'wanker' really necessary?

Yes.

Offline neo_Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 1155
  • Location: London
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #667 on: January 25, 2013, 10:25:23 AM »
I read in the Post yesterday that Wanker was 3rd on the West Midlands 'Rich list'

Is calling him 'wanker' really necessary?
What word do you suggest that describes him more appropriately?

Offline rutski

  • Member
  • Posts: 2085
  • Location: kingswinford
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #668 on: January 25, 2013, 10:28:52 AM »
I read in the Post yesterday that Wanker was 3rd on the West Midlands 'Rich list'

Is calling him 'wanker' really necessary?

Yes.
i dont think it is appropriate, grow up!

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30724
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #669 on: January 25, 2013, 10:29:26 AM »
I read in the Post yesterday that Wanker was 3rd on the West Midlands 'Rich list'

Is calling him 'wanker' really necessary?
What word do you suggest that describes him more appropriately?

I'm not sure but 'wanker' is not one of them.

Offline Jon Crofts

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21848
  • Location: Breaking rocks in the hot sun
  • GM : PCM
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #670 on: January 25, 2013, 10:35:31 AM »
Wanker isn't appropriate you're right, you need a dick & a pair of bollocks to be a wanker, something Lerner is clearly lacking.

Offline neo_Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 1155
  • Location: London
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #671 on: January 25, 2013, 10:43:22 AM »
Double post
« Last Edit: January 25, 2013, 10:45:52 AM by neo_Villan »

Offline neo_Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 1155
  • Location: London
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #672 on: January 25, 2013, 10:44:30 AM »
Wanker isn't appropriate you're right, you need a dick & a pair of bollocks to be a wanker, something Lerner is clearly lacking.
Not to mention that you have to be hands-on to be a wanker...Yank twat it is then.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #673 on: January 25, 2013, 10:47:05 AM »
I read in the Post yesterday that Wanker was 3rd on the West Midlands 'Rich list'

Is calling him 'wanker' really necessary?
What word do you suggest that describes him more appropriately?

I'm not sure but 'wanker' is not one of them.
He sure is a wanker.The Villa and Browns fans can't both be wrong.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: Randy Lerner
« Reply #674 on: January 25, 2013, 10:48:33 AM »
I read in the Post yesterday that Wanker was 3rd on the West Midlands 'Rich list'

Is calling him 'wanker' really necessary?

If the cap fits !

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal