collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Season Ticket 2025/26 by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 09:15:13 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 09:00:33 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by PaulWinch again
[Today at 08:03:13 PM]


Aston Villa Women 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:51:49 PM]


FFP by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:30:33 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Pete3206
[Today at 05:19:31 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Demitri_C
[Today at 02:08:18 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority 'in', 7th May  (Read 848068 times)

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15649
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4395 on: March 05, 2013, 01:36:56 PM »
Ricardo Carvalho has been sitting on his hands at Real Madrid this year as 5th choice centre half and probably won't play another game his season. I know Eig is a big fan.

Carvalho would have been the one for me.  Mourinho told him in August to find a new club.  Surely we could have done a deal for him? Even if Real paid half his wages.


Players like that wouldn't even look in our direction let alone sign for us what our policy of offering YTS wages.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 01:51:12 PM by saunders_heroes »

Offline Merv

  • Member
  • Posts: 4192
  • Location: Undercover
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4396 on: March 05, 2013, 01:41:31 PM »
All the same, makes you wonder why Lambert didn't use some of that January transfer wedge to try and tempt Carvalho.


Offline Lastfootstamper

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11634
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Greater Birmingham
  • GM : PCM
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4397 on: March 05, 2013, 02:00:09 PM »
Seriously?

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15649
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4398 on: March 05, 2013, 02:03:29 PM »
All the same, makes you wonder why Lambert didn't use some of that January transfer wedge to try and tempt Carvalho.



What transfer wedge?

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41403
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4399 on: March 05, 2013, 02:07:02 PM »
This debate reminds me of when you were all trying to convince me that Ireland was a good signing!

Or when some loons on here thought Gary Cahill was crap. ;)

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4400 on: March 05, 2013, 02:07:56 PM »
The next two games are so very crucial- lets hope whatever his faults lambert can get the players up for these games.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 02:14:31 PM by eastie »

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4401 on: March 05, 2013, 02:13:21 PM »


I believe lambert could have strengthened the defence if he wished ., that should have been top priority.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 02:21:53 PM by eastie »

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15649
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4402 on: March 05, 2013, 02:16:47 PM »
He won't be happy with you sharing a private email!

I believe lambert could have strengthened the defence if he wished ., that should have been top priority.

The two players he did get are just bizarre signings. He lost the plot there.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4403 on: March 05, 2013, 02:18:56 PM »



Surely it was obvious to him that he needed to sign someone to go straight into the team not more squad players.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 02:28:34 PM by eastie »

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4404 on: March 05, 2013, 02:22:59 PM »
Worrying times for sure,the loss of delph is the last thing we needed - lets hope vlaar steps in at the weekend - will be a nailbiting game for sure.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 02:27:49 PM by eastie »

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36419
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4405 on: March 05, 2013, 03:23:52 PM »
Sharner or upson would have been better than clark or baker- upsons name is used as an example of the defenders available last month - there would have been many others - the fact that he recruited no defender at all is unacceptable given our plight.

The fact lambert thinks clark has had an excellent season shows just how deluded he is - he has lost the plot but im sure chris you will be defiantly singing his praises if he takes us down .

He's not deluded, he hasn't lost the plot, he's juts trying to keep a group of relatively inexperienced players motivated. Clark had a good game last night, other than one aberration, but because you've decided everything is shit you don't see it. The last thing he needs is the manager slagging him off in public.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54872
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4406 on: March 05, 2013, 03:25:41 PM »
Problem is Chris that one aberration cost us the game. It's also not an isolated incident this season, the defence has consistently made glaring errors which have cost us games.

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36419
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4407 on: March 05, 2013, 03:28:38 PM »
This debate reminds me of when you were all trying to convince me that Ireland was a good signing!

Or when some loons on here thought Gary Cahill was crap. ;)

He's never been crap, just wasn't good enough for a regular starting place with us at the time, so he went to a smaller club to get regular football. Quite admirable in some respects but it buggered us about so I've little sympathy for the git. He's got his big move 4 years later but still doesn't look to have sorted out his concentration issue.

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36419
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4408 on: March 05, 2013, 03:33:17 PM »
Problem is Chris that one aberration cost us the game. It's also not an isolated incident this season, the defence has consistently made glaring errors which have cost us games.

I accept that but unless you can buy the best players at their peak you're always going to get mistakes.

My broader point is that, with 4 centre halves picking up wages currently, it was unlikely that we could afford another one good enough to significantly improve us.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15649
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: Lambert in or out? Poll reset with majority no, 22nd Jan
« Reply #4409 on: March 05, 2013, 03:34:10 PM »
Sharner or upson would have been better than clark or baker- upsons name is used as an example of the defenders available last month - there would have been many others - the fact that he recruited no defender at all is unacceptable given our plight.

The fact lambert thinks clark has had an excellent season shows just how deluded he is - he has lost the plot but im sure chris you will be defiantly singing his praises if he takes us down .

He's not deluded, he hasn't lost the plot, he's juts trying to keep a group of relatively inexperienced players motivated. Clark had a good game last night, other than one aberration, but because you've decided everything is shit you don't see it. The last thing he needs is the manager slagging him off in public.

He lost the plot in January when he in his wisdom decided our defence didnt need strengthening.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal