Lets face facts, QPR with 'Arry feted by press and TV alike, with Webb seemingly very pro home team, were favourites. There have been many times when 1-1 with 20 to go we would have lost. Lambert is fresh air after Eck, or Gerrard, or the latter days of our spendthrift mate from Sunderland. Yes we struggle, but our kids are making progress even in defence, and play some very decent football at times. The whole site seems to be a miserable place at present, without Randy we may be owned by a sty equivalent and and be far worse off. Time to be grateful rather than miserable, the days of Ron Saunders won't return in a hurry if ever, but if we are to succeed sacking Lambert wont do any good at all!
No RipVan but lets wake up to 21st century football, unless you want to start a campaign to find a multi billionaire who like Roman wants to spunk his money down the drain, maybe we are not what we like to sing "Were by far the greatest team the world has ever seen", only once in 46 years of watching the Villa has that been the case, now we are were we are and supporting the manager just maybe the way of getting us out of this mess, remember those manure fans who were telling the red nose wanker he was an arse hole after 25 minutes at Forest that cup game, patience might just pay off. If not and he keeps us up sack him if we are in the same place next year
Quote from: Mister E on December 01, 2012, 05:05:57 PMQuote from: ozzjim on December 01, 2012, 05:03:10 PMI don't buy this shit that we need to make a statement on Bent either. Well said, that man.Not well said.Making a statement about there not being a Bent clause would shut the media up and put the supporters minds at rest that's it's not a financial issue.What harm could it possibly do?
Quote from: ozzjim on December 01, 2012, 05:03:10 PMI don't buy this shit that we need to make a statement on Bent either. Well said, that man.
I don't buy this shit that we need to make a statement on Bent either.
Quote from: Rip Van doin' the Lambert walk on December 01, 2012, 05:29:25 PMQuote from: OCD on December 01, 2012, 05:28:01 PMIf we can beat Stoke we'll go onto 17 points. That's a big ask I reckon.They should have no trouble bullying our kids.I think we will be ok against Stoke.
Quote from: OCD on December 01, 2012, 05:28:01 PMIf we can beat Stoke we'll go onto 17 points. That's a big ask I reckon.They should have no trouble bullying our kids.
If we can beat Stoke we'll go onto 17 points.
Quote from: Rip Van doin' the Lambert walk on December 01, 2012, 05:11:50 PMQuote from: Mister E on December 01, 2012, 05:05:57 PMQuote from: ozzjim on December 01, 2012, 05:03:10 PMI don't buy this shit that we need to make a statement on Bent either. Well said, that man.Not well said.Making a statement about there not being a Bent clause would shut the media up and put the supporters minds at rest that's it's not a financial issue.What harm could it possibly do?He did, Friday. When persistently asked by Pete Colley at the press conference, he categorically stated he wasn't not picking him because of some extra payement clause.
Aston Villa manager Paul Lambert: "I think it was a doubly hard game because of where QPR are in the league and Harry coming in. To come here and get a point is massive for us. I'm delighted to get a point. We are on a little run at the moment. You can stretch it back to Sunderland in terms of how we've been playing."
Didn't loose which is the main thing!
Quote from: eamonn on December 01, 2012, 05:33:11 PMAston Villa manager Paul Lambert: "I think it was a doubly hard game because of where QPR are in the league and Harry coming in. To come here and get a point is massive for us. I'm delighted to get a point. We are on a little run at the moment. You can stretch it back to Sunderland in terms of how we've been playing."Did he really say that?A draw with QPR is deemed "massive" - how fecking small time is that?"Delighted with a point" - McLeish would have been toast had he uttered those words, so why does Lambert get away with it?