The OS is the worst website I've seen from an entity with the sort of turnover they have. We could easily have an injury update page that continually updates the status of injured players. Even in Plumbutt Cooper's example, such a page could easily tell us just that - that they're waiting for the swelling to settle down before doing an MRI.
If information like this is freely available, I don't know why we can't show it. It doesn't need to be detailed and I'm not suggesting that we give opposition any help. http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_premier_league/epl_injury_table.php?SKEY=62dd2f8983ca0924e64a2e460159470c
Spot on Ad@m. I bet a few Bradford fans got a nasty surprise when they suddenly discovered that we're not as depleted in the striking department at they first hoped.
Quote from: Pete3206 on January 05, 2013, 07:13:04 PMSpot on Ad@m. I bet a few Bradford fans got a nasty surprise when they suddenly discovered that we're not as depleted in the striking department at they first hoped.But PL said at his news conference on friday that Bent, Gabby and Zog had trained that morning and he would see how they felt before naming the team on Saturday, so that told the world they were in with a very good chance of playing. The only one who was a surprise to me was Baker as he hadn't been mentioned anywhere.
We never got any prognosis on Vlaar at all, could be wrong but try and find some PL quotes after Arsenal/Reading estimating how long he'd be out for.Fergie usually comes out and says how long players will be out for e.g. saying Rooney will be out for two weeks. That might be playing mind games with Liverpool but at least you know the rough extent of his injury.With Vlaar, not a clue!