collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Kits 25/26 by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 01:53:08 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 01:52:25 PM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by PaulWinch again
[Today at 01:51:24 PM]


Brentford v Aston Villa Pre Match Thread. by Hookeysmith
[Today at 01:19:41 PM]


Unai Emery by eamonn
[Today at 01:05:12 PM]


Leon Bailey (out on loan to AS Roma) by algy
[Today at 12:36:49 PM]


Games Moved for TV by Exeter 77
[Today at 12:24:38 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by ChicagoLion
[Today at 12:20:45 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?  (Read 59638 times)

Online KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 14114
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #210 on: December 31, 2012, 07:31:34 PM »


Faulkner is just an overpromoted idiot with his dreams of a Villa side winning titles/making money on the back of a youth squad who clearly aren't good enough.

I don't even credit him with that sort of naivety.

He's just doing his masters bidding.  Lerner might have dreams of replicating Ajax's approach.  Or Everton's. 

Faulkner probably doesn't give a fcuk.  A few soundbites here and there, but ultimately out of his depth.  There probably is logic to the decision to give a rookie Personnel Manager at MBNA the responsibility of running one of the country's biggest clubs.  Fcuked if I know what it is though.

Offline TheSandman

  • Member
  • Posts: 34781
  • Age: 34
  • Location: The seaside town that they forgot to bomb
  • GM : May, 2013
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #211 on: December 31, 2012, 07:38:49 PM »
I think you answered your own question. The logic being that he is someone who Lerner trusts to do his bidding.

Offline old man villa fan

  • Member
  • Posts: 3458
  • Location: Birmingham
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #212 on: December 31, 2012, 07:41:28 PM »
Villa's losses could make Lerner cut his

At what stage does Randy Lerner decide that he has had enough of life as Aston Villa's owner? The American made a rare visit to Villa Park on Saturday and must have departed wishing he had stayed away. Villa are heading for a relegation battle for the third successive season, which must be particularly galling when Lerner looks at a balance sheet that shows he has pumped upwards of £200m into the club since he took over in 2006. The club's net spend over the last five years is just under £70m, which is the fourth highest in the Premier League. Tottenham's net spend over that period is just over £3m. Everton's figures show a profit. Yet while those two clubs are pursuing Champions League qualification, Villa are trying to avoid slipping into the Championship, which means Lerner may have to dip into his pocket once more. There must come a point when he becomes fed up with running up huge losses and seeing little reward on the pitch and decides it is time to sell up and get out. Stuart James

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/dec/31/premier-league-10-talking-points


Can't fault the amount of money Lerners put in. Its shocking we are spending so much and fighting relegation battles. It makes me imagine an aerial view of villa park with one of those black holes and money disappearing into it.

Pity he let the Poison Dwarf squander so much of it. Every manager since has had to suffer for that twat.

Bit harsh, Mcleish spent about £20m on nzogbia, Hutton and given and Hutton and nzogbia have both proved poor value , as did makoun and Ireland who both arrived after mon , so there's the best part of £40m spent .

O Neill wasted a fortune I agree, but he's not the only one .

Amazing to see where Everton are and the squad they have on far far less money than we spent on recent years , they rarely make bad signings where we have made loads in recent years.

MON spent a lot of money on assembling a very average squad with a few quality players.  Take away those quality players and the squad was shown to be what it was, very average.

Successive managers have inheritted this legacy and convinced Lerner that they could buy a few players to get the team back to where it was.  Add to this, the injury situation that the current and previous two managers have had to put up with and you can see why we are where we are.  Some said at the time that MON was lucky in that final season with injuries and lucky 1-0 wins.  It seems as though we are now paying for it.


Offline richsvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 31
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #213 on: December 31, 2012, 07:56:09 PM »
I blame the MON era. Spent alot of money on some average players. At the time I wasnt to bothered as we was doing ok but looking back at it now there was some real money wasted and bad decisions. Also lerner has to be blamed for draining any positive feeling from the fans with two dire managerial appointments.

Online ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31085
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #214 on: December 31, 2012, 08:17:16 PM »
Martin O'Neill and Paul Faulkner, one for identifying and buying such a load of shit, and one for agreeing it.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35563
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #215 on: January 01, 2013, 09:30:37 AM »
Don't think it matters anymore. Threads like this or similar have been on here for the last 3 years with all of us (me in particular) dishing out the blame. Bottom line is only 3 of those names on the list still have an input on how aston villa are run.

Lambert seems to have been dealt the same shoddy hand as the last two encumbents - that doesn't excuse his piss poor organisation and tactics - he needs to get a grip - fast.

Faulkner is just an overpromoted idiot with his dreams of a Villa side winning titles/making money on the back of a youth squad who clearly aren't good enough. If it was possible Paul, don't you think the likes of Man U, Chelsea, and Citeh would be doing it? Or do you think they like spending billions on other club's players? Lerner's new years resolution should be to get someone living on planet earth in and jettison the prat.

Lerner. Well where do you start? I can't work out if he's stupid, just knows nothing about football, or he's got some sort of Brewster's millions thing going on.  Taking advice from Ferguson hints at a combination of the first two options. God help us.

Well said Greg.
I have to agree.
Yes,you can always rely on Greg to appear to tell us how shit things are whenever we hit a bad run

What has he said that isn't true?  And we've been shite for most of the season, if you hadn't realised.

There's nothing there that's 'true', it's just the usual miserablist subjective garbage.

You favour it because you're in full sacrifice mode.

There ARE facts there LeeB you daft old headinthesandanista you, such as Lerner and Faulkner running the club, and Lerner taking advice from Ferguson (I wonder if that letter is still safely tucked up in his safe?).  The rest, if not exactly "facts", are at least hard to argue with, unless you actually believe that Faulkner is doing a good job or that Lerner knows how to run a football club.  But nobody's that dim, surely?

I'm having 'headinthesandinista', that's superb.

The truth is, I don't know exactly what Faulkner's remit is for his job, and with whom to apportion blame for the things that have gone wrong.

But I also know there is no hard and fast rules about how to run a football club, and in most cases success will be stumbled upon, or accrued by throwing vast sums of money at it until it works.

You know, maybe the chairman and CEO have learned quite a bit about how to run the club in the past couple of years, and maybe we'll be better off for it going forward.


Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #216 on: January 01, 2013, 09:43:41 AM »
All of the above to various degrees. I think O Neill's outdated methods, tunnel vision, combined with Randy's naivity are most to blame with our current plight. I don't blame the last two managers as much. McLeish was horrendous granted, but he was an appointment that promised little more. We knew it, Randy didn't. Lamberts made a lot of errors and seems in many ways over his head, but I can appreciate his vision, even if he's yet to find the right formula to make that vision happen.

Offline Villafirst

  • Member
  • Posts: 7359
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #217 on: January 01, 2013, 11:36:16 AM »
All of the above to various degrees. I think O Neill's outdated methods, tunnel vision, combined with Randy's naivity are most to blame with our current plight. I don't blame the last two managers as much. McLeish was horrendous granted, but he was an appointment that promised little more. We knew it, Randy didn't. Lamberts made a lot of errors and seems in many ways over his head, but I can appreciate his vision, even if he's yet to find the right formula to make that vision happen.

As I've said before, I knows it's easy with the benefit of hindsight, but MON's appointment was the wrong choice. He had been out of managing in the Premier League for some years and when he returned, his methods were basically outdated and limited. A top-class foreign manager would've been a much better choice, particularly with the big money available for transfers at the time.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #218 on: January 01, 2013, 11:40:50 AM »
All of the above to various degrees. I think O Neill's outdated methods, tunnel vision, combined with Randy's naivity are most to blame with our current plight. I don't blame the last two managers as much. McLeish was horrendous granted, but he was an appointment that promised little more. We knew it, Randy didn't. Lamberts made a lot of errors and seems in many ways over his head, but I can appreciate his vision, even if he's yet to find the right formula to make that vision happen.

As I've said before, I knows it's easy with the benefit of hindsight, but MON's appointment was the wrong choice. He had been out of managing in the Premier League for some years and when he returned, his methods were basically outdated and limited. A top-class foreign manager would've been a much better choice, particularly with the big money available for transfers at the time.

So we shouldn't have gone for o Neill because he had been away from the premier league too long , but we should have gone for a foreign manager who probably had never managed in the premier league?

Offline Villadroid

  • Member
  • Posts: 648
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #219 on: January 01, 2013, 12:25:44 PM »
.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2013, 01:54:51 PM by Villadroid »

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15662
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #220 on: January 01, 2013, 12:28:50 PM »
Villa's losses could make Lerner cut his

At what stage does Randy Lerner decide that he has had enough of life as Aston Villa's owner? The American made a rare visit to Villa Park on Saturday and must have departed wishing he had stayed away. Villa are heading for a relegation battle for the third successive season, which must be particularly galling when Lerner looks at a balance sheet that shows he has pumped upwards of £200m into the club since he took over in 2006. The club's net spend over the last five years is just under £70m, which is the fourth highest in the Premier League. Tottenham's net spend over that period is just over £3m. Everton's figures show a profit. Yet while those two clubs are pursuing Champions League qualification, Villa are trying to avoid slipping into the Championship, which means Lerner may have to dip into his pocket once more. There must come a point when he becomes fed up with running up huge losses and seeing little reward on the pitch and decides it is time to sell up and get out. Stuart James

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/dec/31/premier-league-10-talking-points


Can't fault the amount of money Lerners put in. Its shocking we are spending so much and fighting relegation battles. It makes me imagine an aerial view of villa park with one of those black holes and money disappearing into it.

Pity he let the Poison Dwarf squander so much of it. Every manager since has had to suffer for that twat.

Bit harsh, Mcleish spent about £20m on nzogbia, Hutton and given and Hutton and nzogbia have both proved poor value , as did makoun and Ireland who both arrived after mon , so there's the best part of £40m spent .

O Neill wasted a fortune I agree, but he's not the only one .

Amazing to see where Everton are and the squad they have on far far less money than we spent on recent years , they rarely make bad signings where we have made loads in recent years.

MON spent a lot of money on assembling a very average squad with a few quality players.  Take away those quality players and the squad was shown to be what it was, very average.

Successive managers have inheritted this legacy and convinced Lerner that they could buy a few players to get the team back to where it was.  Add to this, the injury situation that the current and previous two managers have had to put up with and you can see why we are where we are.  Some said at the time that MON was lucky in that final season with injuries and lucky 1-0 wins.  It seems as though we are now paying for it.



If the squad that got us 3 consecutive top 6 finishes was "very average" I'd hate to think what you'd class our squad as of now.

Offline old man villa fan

  • Member
  • Posts: 3458
  • Location: Birmingham
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #221 on: January 01, 2013, 06:17:02 PM »


MON spent a lot of money on assembling a very average squad with a few quality players.  Take away those quality players and the squad was shown to be what it was, very average.

Successive managers have inheritted this legacy and convinced Lerner that they could buy a few players to get the team back to where it was.  Add to this, the injury situation that the current and previous two managers have had to put up with and you can see why we are where we are.  Some said at the time that MON was lucky in that final season with injuries and lucky 1-0 wins.  It seems as though we are now paying for it.



If the squad that got us 3 consecutive top 6 finishes was "very average" I'd hate to think what you'd class our squad as of now.

We had 3 top 6 finishes is because we had a spinkling of quality as I said.  We sold the quality and the remainder have been shown to be average.

As you raised something to perpetuate your continual dig at the club, rather than comment on the topic in question, I will at least show courtesy in answering.

Yes, the current squad is very average and weak in a number of areas but the young players will improve with experience.  Also, Lambert has only has one transfer window to transform a squad of underachievers.  The rebuilding of the club will take 3 or 4 years to put it on strong foundations for the future.

Offline sonlyme

  • Member
  • Posts: 349
  • Location: West Midlands
Re: Who Do You Blame/Who Are You Angry With?
« Reply #222 on: January 03, 2013, 10:27:09 PM »
I blame the futile and unhelpful mentality of always seeking to find someone to blame.

No.

I do.

Offline hawkeye

  • Member
  • Posts: 8973
  • GM : Jun, 2012
Who is most to blame?
« Reply #223 on: January 08, 2013, 11:53:44 PM »
We are in a mess, we have just been easily beaten by a 4th Division team. This on the back of thrashings by Chelsea Spurs and the mighty Wigan.

It is pretty obvious that many of the players are not good enough to wear the shirt.

So is it Lerners penny pinching or Lamberts misguded faith in his ability to turn lower league kids into Premier League players?
« Last Edit: January 09, 2013, 12:16:15 AM by hawkeye »

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74621
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Who is to blame?
« Reply #224 on: January 08, 2013, 11:55:03 PM »
They're clearly both to blame to some extent.

Maybe you should be asking who is most to blame?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal