collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

FFP by andyh
[Today at 01:09:53 PM]


Yasin Ozcan (now out on loan at Anderlecht) by frank black
[Today at 01:04:54 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Somniloquism
[Today at 12:56:22 PM]


Pre season 2025 by VillaTim
[Today at 12:52:43 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by olaftab
[Today at 12:20:52 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 11:18:27 AM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by AV84
[Today at 10:54:07 AM]


1994 01 29 MOTD Grimsby v Aston Villa by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:16:04 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: FFP by andyh
[Today at 01:09:53 PM]


Re: Yasin Ozcan (now out on loan at Anderlecht) by frank black
[Today at 01:04:54 PM]


Re: Yasin Ozcan (now out on loan at Anderlecht) by Dave
[Today at 01:00:51 PM]


Re: The International Cricket Thread by Somniloquism
[Today at 12:56:22 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by VillaTim
[Today at 12:52:43 PM]


Re: FFP by Somniloquism
[Today at 12:49:25 PM]


Re: The International Cricket Thread by Mellin
[Today at 12:48:38 PM]


Re: The International Cricket Thread by olaftab
[Today at 12:47:54 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Stephen Ireland  (Read 158426 times)

Online OzVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 7987
  • Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
  • GM : 16.08.2023
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #570 on: December 21, 2013, 09:54:53 PM »
£60,000.
I simply can not comprehend how that happened.

We signed him when we didn't have a manager and the player asked for exorbitant wages as he didn't want to come in the first place - stupidly we signed him anyway.

Two lessons to be learned.

Never sign players when you don't have a permanent manager and never sign players are not 100%  keen on joining.

Not the Clubs finest hour.

Offline Pat McMahon

  • Member
  • Posts: 7223
  • Location: Shanghai - Blarney Stone for Villa games
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #571 on: December 22, 2013, 12:49:45 AM »
Agreed Ozvilla. Signing a player when you have no manager just seems plain batshit to me. Who even decided we wanted him?

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75699
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #572 on: December 22, 2013, 12:55:46 AM »
£60,000.
I simply can not comprehend how that happened.

We signed him when we didn't have a manager and the player asked for exorbitant wages as he didn't want to come in the first place - stupidly we signed him anyway.

Two lessons to be learned.

Never sign players when you don't have a permanent manager and never sign players are not 100%  keen on joining.

Not the Clubs finest hour.

It is easy with hindsight. There were very few complaints on here at the time, indeed many thought we had absolutely mugged City and were delighted to get Ireland.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2013, 12:57:26 AM by PeterWithesShin »

Online OzVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 7987
  • Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
  • GM : 16.08.2023
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #573 on: December 22, 2013, 01:06:23 AM »
£60,000.
I simply can not comprehend how that happened.

We signed him when we didn't have a manager and the player asked for exorbitant wages as he didn't want to come in the first place - stupidly we signed him anyway.

Two lessons to be learned.

Never sign players when you don't have a permanent manager and never sign players are not 100%  keen on joining.

Not the Clubs finest hour.

It is easy with hindsight. There were very few complaints on here at the time, indeed many thought we had absolutely mugged City and were delighted to get Ireland.

Well as soon as he said we didn't want to leave Citeh I certainly said we should end our interest and I know I wasn't the only one.

I just hope we learn from it.  Only then will his time here have been worth anything.

Offline robbo1874

  • Member
  • Posts: 3386
  • Location: Bris-vegas
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #574 on: December 22, 2013, 01:35:40 AM »
It's the 60k a week that sticks in the throat. If he was on 5k I'd still be disappointed in his attitude and the way he conducted himself as a Villa player, but it would have been nowhere near as bad. Absolute tosser.

When you think about your own job and what value you add to your company compared to the reward you get, twats like Ireland really twist your melons.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75699
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #575 on: December 22, 2013, 01:41:26 AM »
Well as soon as he said we didn't want to leave Citeh I certainly said we should end our interest and I know I wasn't the only one.

I just hope we learn from it.  Only then will his time here have been worth anything.

I was never a fan of him, but that isn't the point. The vast majority on here were delighted to get him. You only have to look at his signing thread to see it. So when most would have signed him and thought it was a great move it's hard to then blame the club for signing him.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #576 on: December 22, 2013, 03:11:23 AM »
Well as soon as he said we didn't want to leave Citeh I certainly said we should end our interest and I know I wasn't the only one.

I just hope we learn from it.  Only then will his time here have been worth anything.

I was never a fan of him, but that isn't the point. The vast majority on here were delighted to get him. You only have to look at his signing thread to see it. So when most would have signed him and thought it was a great move it's hard to then blame the club for signing him.

I think we expected to see the stephen Ireland who had been city's player of the year under Hughes and looked a superb player - we never really got anything like that from him in his time here.

The mistake was signing him when managerless .

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75699
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #577 on: December 22, 2013, 03:18:18 AM »
Missing the point yet again. It's a mistake because hindsight shows he was shit for us. Virtually no one thought it was a mistake at the time. Read the signing thread and then tell me how many were agaisnt it and thought it was a mistake.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #578 on: December 22, 2013, 03:31:45 AM »
Missing the point yet again. It's a mistake because hindsight shows he was shit for us. Virtually no one thought it was a mistake at the time. Read the signing thread and then tell me how many were agaisnt it and thought it was a mistake.

I thought he was a good signing at the time myself - but as the club hadn't a manager it was a mistake to buy any player a future manager may not rate .

Hindsight isn't needed to see that you don't buy big money players without a manager .

I rated him but it should have been the new manager who decided on the deal .
« Last Edit: December 22, 2013, 03:33:57 AM by eastie »

Offline Goldie.7

  • Member
  • Posts: 5255
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #579 on: December 22, 2013, 03:37:34 AM »
Missing the point yet again. It's a mistake because hindsight shows he was shit for us. Virtually no one thought it was a mistake at the time. Read the signing thread and then tell me how many were against it and thought it was a mistake.

Where is that thread i was looking for it earlier.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75699
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #580 on: December 22, 2013, 03:40:35 AM »
Still missing the point. It is only a mistake because hindsight shows us he was a failure here. If it was such an obvious mistake at the time why wasn't his signing thread filled with comments saying that?

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75699
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #581 on: December 22, 2013, 03:46:16 AM »
Missing the point yet again. It's a mistake because hindsight shows he was shit for us. Virtually no one thought it was a mistake at the time. Read the signing thread and then tell me how many were against it and thought it was a mistake.

Where is that thread i was looking for it earlier.

http://www.heroesandvillains.info/forumv3/index.php?topic=39825.0

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 59
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #582 on: December 22, 2013, 03:46:50 AM »
Still missing the point. It is only a mistake because hindsight shows us he was a failure here. If it was such an obvious mistake at the time why wasn't his signing thread filled with comments saying that?

Because most of us rated him as a quality player - but the person who mattered was the manager and we hadn't got one at the time .

Do you think we should have bought a player at such cost without a manager ?
I'm certainly not saying he was a shit player , he was the type of player we needed but surely the manager should decide if he wants him or not ?

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58428
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #583 on: December 22, 2013, 03:47:39 AM »
Missing the point yet again. It's a mistake because hindsight shows he was shit for us. Virtually no one thought it was a mistake at the time. Read the signing thread and then tell me how many were against it and thought it was a mistake.

Where is that thread i was looking for it earlier.

http://www.heroesandvillains.info/forumv3/index.php?topic=39825.0

Yep, we were all completely conned by the fucking waster.

Online eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33690
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Stephen Ireland
« Reply #584 on: December 22, 2013, 03:48:49 AM »
I thought it was a wonderful deal.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal