collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Matthew Lowton  (Read 153044 times)

Offline martin o`who??

  • Member
  • Posts: 1850
  • Location: No mans land
  • Apparently I am my own worst enemy.
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #240 on: May 04, 2013, 12:56:02 PM »
Top scouts from other clubs, look into my eyes and repeat after me "This is not the player we are looking for".

Offline neo_Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 1155
  • Location: London
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #241 on: May 04, 2013, 05:11:26 PM »
Such a shame he couldn't get the ever-present record.

Offline David_Nab

  • Member
  • Posts: 4285
  • Location: Luton
  • GM : 24.12.2015
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #242 on: May 04, 2013, 05:22:48 PM »
Hope he is back for the next game

Online Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 8261
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #243 on: May 04, 2013, 05:43:23 PM »
Was it a thigh muscle he pulled?

Anyone know the extent or length of treatment?

Offline OCD

  • Member
  • Posts: 34100
  • Location: Stuck in the middle with you
    • http://www.rightconsultant.com
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #244 on: May 04, 2013, 05:45:00 PM »
I think Grant Holt ran his studs down his leg (being the dirty bastard he is). If it is that he'll be alright for next week. A muscle injury would make him a doubt.

Offline The Man With A Stick

  • Member
  • Posts: 13223
  • Location: Lichfield
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #245 on: May 04, 2013, 05:48:17 PM »
Holt is a fat talentless sack of bollocks, he really is.  Can't believe he got into double figures last season.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43249
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #246 on: May 04, 2013, 08:29:59 PM »
He really is shite (Holt), Rickie Lambert is a much better player.

Sad Lowton couldn't get an ever present record in the league.

Offline supertom

  • Member
  • Posts: 18827
  • Location: High Wycombe, just left of Paradise.
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #247 on: May 04, 2013, 09:52:00 PM »
I was imagining during the game, how our season might have transpired if we'd bought Holt instead of Tekkers. It wasn't a pleasant thought either. In truth we'd be relegated already.

Thank the fuck christ.

Offline villan from luton

  • Member
  • Posts: 3049
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #248 on: May 04, 2013, 10:06:04 PM »
Supertom, from what i understand, Holt wasnt a popular person with Lambert and Culverhouse, so wasnt going to happen

Offline Tokyo Sexwhale

  • Member
  • Posts: 3428
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #249 on: May 25, 2013, 11:02:40 PM »
Matt Lowton's Stoke goal from behind the goal!


Offline gervilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 2893
  • Location: Co. Cork
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #250 on: May 25, 2013, 11:04:59 PM »
Matt Lowton's Stoke goal from behind the goal!



That is fantastic.
I could watch that over and over again.
OK so I will.

Offline The Left Side

  • Member
  • Posts: 8006
  • Location: Somewhere between Brum and Vancouver
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #251 on: May 26, 2013, 08:27:44 PM »
Great stuff

Offline Tokyo Sexwhale

  • Member
  • Posts: 3428
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #252 on: May 26, 2013, 08:41:32 PM »
I like that "ohh!" just as he realises it's going in.

Offline manic-road

  • Member
  • Posts: 7034
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #253 on: June 06, 2013, 09:55:37 AM »
Listening to Paul Lambert on the radio this morning, he told Neil Warnock that we definitely paid no more than a million for Lowton, now that's what I call a bargain.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Matthew Lowton
« Reply #254 on: June 06, 2013, 09:58:15 AM »
Has anybody got a link to his similar effort from earlier in the season?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal