collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

The International Cricket Thread by OzVilla
[Today at 01:55:14 AM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 12:47:07 AM]


GUESS THE CROWD R12: ASTON VILLA v Manc United Sunday, 21st December! by Rotterdam 82
[Today at 12:46:11 AM]


The NFL Thread (with added College Football) by cdbearsfan
[December 19, 2025, 11:54:43 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Brazilian Villain
[December 19, 2025, 11:31:04 PM]


Pau Torres by Percy McCarthy
[December 19, 2025, 11:25:15 PM]


For one day only, and that's too long - You Know Who at home by KingstandingVilla
[December 19, 2025, 10:53:37 PM]


Will we win the Premier League by Smirker
[December 19, 2025, 10:39:40 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Guzan  (Read 67799 times)

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: Guzan
« Reply #180 on: September 22, 2012, 07:57:43 PM »



Certainly today the defence can at least take some of the blame - 2 nd half we defended very poorly.

« Last Edit: September 22, 2012, 08:01:08 PM by eastie »

Offline bobcat

  • Member
  • Posts: 3261
  • Location: Somewhere between pessimism and realism, I hope.
  • GM : 01.06.2017
Re: Guzan
« Reply #181 on: September 22, 2012, 11:33:44 PM »
He isn't good enough yet. Being loud and American isn't the same as commanding a box. Hes hit and miss on crosses and his kicking is only slightly better than bosnichs. One of many players who are not good enough.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75247
  • GM : 22.10.2026
Re: Guzan
« Reply #182 on: September 22, 2012, 11:41:11 PM »
He isn't good enough yet. Being loud and American isn't the same as commanding a box. Hes hit and miss on crosses and his kicking is only slightly better than bosnichs. One of many players who are not good enough.

When it comes to commanding his box, he's much better than Given, though, and I can't help but think that's what we really need now, something to give the defence confidence.

Offline Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48779
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 17.09.2026
Re: Guzan
« Reply #183 on: September 23, 2012, 12:43:17 AM »
neither are good enough imo
Which couple of keepers are you thinking we should have as our first and second choice instead?

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 44693
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 13.12.2026
Re: Guzan
« Reply #184 on: September 23, 2012, 12:56:19 AM »
I am not sure Guzan is the long term answer but he is definitely preferable to Given.

Offline Phil from the upper holte

  • Member
  • Posts: 10142
  • Location: B62
Re: Guzan
« Reply #185 on: September 23, 2012, 07:31:25 AM »
Drop Guzan because he was at fault for one goal? Ridiculous

Offline onje_villa

  • Member
  • Posts: 1215
  • GM : Jan, 2013
Re: Guzan
« Reply #186 on: September 23, 2012, 08:14:10 AM »
He isn't good enough yet. Being loud and American isn't the same as commanding a box. Hes hit and miss on crosses and his kicking is only slightly better than bosnichs. One of many players who are not good enough.

You on the windup Bobcat?

Offline bobcat

  • Member
  • Posts: 3261
  • Location: Somewhere between pessimism and realism, I hope.
  • GM : 01.06.2017
Re: Guzan
« Reply #187 on: September 23, 2012, 05:35:25 PM »
No. He isn't good enough to be a first choice. He is a handy back up keeper who's good at penalties, but I don't see him being number 1 long term so I wouldn't persevere with him in the medium term. I think Given deserves a chance to rediscover some form.

Offline Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18545
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: Guzan
« Reply #188 on: September 23, 2012, 07:56:00 PM »
No. He isn't good enough to be a first choice. He is a handy back up keeper who's good at penalties, but I don't see him being number 1 long term so I wouldn't persevere with him in the medium term. I think Given deserves a chance to rediscover some form.
nope.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Guzan
« Reply #189 on: September 23, 2012, 08:28:24 PM »
I'd prefer to stick with Guzan for now. We can't keep chopping & changing keepers. Having said that, it's probably worth playing Given on Tuesday night to stop him getting rusty & a chance to regain some confidence.

Offline gervilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 2893
  • Location: Co. Cork
Re: Guzan
« Reply #190 on: September 23, 2012, 08:39:12 PM »
I'd say stick with Brad and let Given be to one to be the Cup keeper as Brad was for long enough.
I don't see any reason why Brad should be dropped as number 1.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43375
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Guzan
« Reply #191 on: September 23, 2012, 08:48:01 PM »
Guzan is much better than Carson I think who was incredibly lucky we had such a good attacking team as he was nowhere near a top 6 keeper.

Offline gervilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 2893
  • Location: Co. Cork
Re: Guzan
« Reply #192 on: September 23, 2012, 08:50:50 PM »
Carson was terrible.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43375
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Guzan
« Reply #193 on: September 23, 2012, 08:59:12 PM »
But that shows you can sometimes get away with having a mediocre keeper if your attacking play works like a dream (well in that case accurate set pieces from Young).


Offline bobcat

  • Member
  • Posts: 3261
  • Location: Somewhere between pessimism and realism, I hope.
  • GM : 01.06.2017
Re: Guzan
« Reply #194 on: September 23, 2012, 09:25:35 PM »
Carson was a mute most of the time. An average keeper at best.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal