collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Follow us on...

Author Topic: New York 2012  (Read 3153 times)

Online UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41392
  • Location: Forest of Dean & 'Nam
  • GM : 10.02.2025
New York 2012
« on: August 01, 2012, 10:39:04 AM »
What if the 2012 Olympics had been awarded to NYC ?

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/8218316/examining-pipe-dreams-real-accomplishments-new-york-failed-bid-host-2012-summer-olympics


Quote
But was the West Side Stadium really dead? Alex Garvin, the Olympic bid's lead planner, said it wasn't. "We always intended, if we won, to push for the West Side Stadium again," he said. "We believed that [State Assembly Speaker] Sheldon Silver would come around if the Olympics were a reality." The bid planners, according to Garvin, would have made a second attempt at securing state funding for the stadium, with the Jets as the primary tenant. If the stadium had been built, the proposals for its use could have been limitless. Cross said there were plans to host major college football games and an annual match between the winners of Europe's Champions League and South America's Copa Libertadores. There was talk that the stadium could attract the first Premier League team outside the U.K. as an additional tenant. And, of course, the Jets would be in Manhattan.


In amongst all the "Game 39" debate, I don't remember the possibility of moving a team to NYC ever being mentioned.

Offline usav

  • Member
  • Posts: 15471
  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
  • GM : 09.02.2019
Re: New York 2012
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2012, 02:33:51 PM »
Me either.

Offline ExclDawg

  • Member
  • Posts: 1142
  • Location: California, USA
Re: New York 2012
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2012, 08:38:38 PM »
There's constant "talk" of moving an NFL team to London too ... sometimes sports writers just pull stuff out of their backsides because they have nothing else to talk about, and are still required to fill space.

Offline usav

  • Member
  • Posts: 15471
  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
  • GM : 09.02.2019
Re: New York 2012
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2012, 08:39:40 PM »
There's constant "talk" of moving an NFL team to London too ...

That one has legs though, having an English Premier league team in New York has not be mentioned anywhere up until that report, as far as I'm aware.

Online UK Redsox

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41392
  • Location: Forest of Dean & 'Nam
  • GM : 10.02.2025
Re: New York 2012
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2012, 09:07:47 PM »
After 20 minutes of Googling and Yahooing, I've found no other articles mentioning the idea of moving an English team to NYC

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24909
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2024
Re: New York 2012
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2012, 09:12:51 PM »
Losing 19 away games a season due to jetlag would mean they would be relegated in the first season.

Offline hipkiss92

  • Member
  • Posts: 1350
  • Location: Northampton
Re: New York 2012
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2012, 10:39:44 PM »
Losing 19 away games a season due to jetlag would mean they would be relegated in the first season.

Unless they win the 19 home games due to other team having jet lag, 57 points is normally good enough for upper midtable

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24909
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2024
Re: New York 2012
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2012, 10:08:19 PM »
Losing 19 away games a season due to jetlag would mean they would be relegated in the first season.

Unless they win the 19 home games due to other team having jet lag, 57 points is normally good enough for upper midtable

Jet lag is supposedly worse flying from America to the UK. So the return match after the flight might be worse for the English team. I bet we wouldn't get one of those matches as we always seem to miss the match after a European leg as well.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39975
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 12.06.2024
Re: New York 2012
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2012, 01:17:51 PM »
Me either.
This is interesting and I have been thinking about it all morning.
The question is is it "me either" or "me neither"?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal