Nah, Gardner being given his marching orders was the highlight. There was a rendition of "Martin, you're a twat" as well. He apologised for the timing of his resignation in the post-match interview he gave to 5live too.
Quote from: Ad@m on April 21, 2012, 05:44:08 PMNah, Gardner being given his marching orders was the highlight. There was a rendition of "Martin, you're a twat" as well. He apologised for the timing of his resignation in the post-match interview he gave to 5live too. did Gardner have a support Stan tshirt on when departing ?
Quote from: VILLA MOLE on April 21, 2012, 05:56:10 PMQuote from: Ad@m on April 21, 2012, 05:44:08 PMNah, Gardner being given his marching orders was the highlight. There was a rendition of "Martin, you're a twat" as well. He apologised for the timing of his resignation in the post-match interview he gave to 5live too. did Gardner have a support Stan tshirt on when departing ? No idea. I could only see his back from my seat in the Holte.
Quote from: john2710 on April 21, 2012, 01:00:44 PMQuote from: hawkeye on April 21, 2012, 12:10:03 AMThe real arguement came down to the Milner transfer, not exactly news but he insisted that he could use the Milner money, he recorded every conversation with Faulkner and Lerner and of course they were not quite as meticulous as MON and that is why they settled. one set of lawyers had a complete dossier, the other set had virtualy nothing because RL and Faulkner did not bother to take notes. MON maintains that he has the goods on Lerner and Faulkner but he signed away his right to publish for 5 years. He will complete his Biography and then the MON version of the truth will be out.If that is anything near the truth & I suspect it is, it shows MON was preparing an exit in advance. Once he'd got his proof for the constructive dismissal case, he triggered the exit, the fact that the timing delivered the most disruption possible was an added bonus. It was rumored around February that he was preparing to walk, if he was unhappy he could of just walked. As it was he won on all counts;1. Leaves with managerial reputation intact2. Is vindicated in court by constructive dismissal claim3. Gets paid while he watches us fall apart.4. Gets another job where the process starts again, Sunderland be warned. Doesn't ring true to me. If it was then Lerner and Co would be well within their rights to broadcast the tricks he was up to. What sort of chairman would employ a manager who tapes private telephone conversations?
Quote from: hawkeye on April 21, 2012, 12:10:03 AMThe real arguement came down to the Milner transfer, not exactly news but he insisted that he could use the Milner money, he recorded every conversation with Faulkner and Lerner and of course they were not quite as meticulous as MON and that is why they settled. one set of lawyers had a complete dossier, the other set had virtualy nothing because RL and Faulkner did not bother to take notes. MON maintains that he has the goods on Lerner and Faulkner but he signed away his right to publish for 5 years. He will complete his Biography and then the MON version of the truth will be out.If that is anything near the truth & I suspect it is, it shows MON was preparing an exit in advance. Once he'd got his proof for the constructive dismissal case, he triggered the exit, the fact that the timing delivered the most disruption possible was an added bonus. It was rumored around February that he was preparing to walk, if he was unhappy he could of just walked. As it was he won on all counts;1. Leaves with managerial reputation intact2. Is vindicated in court by constructive dismissal claim3. Gets paid while he watches us fall apart.4. Gets another job where the process starts again, Sunderland be warned.
The real arguement came down to the Milner transfer, not exactly news but he insisted that he could use the Milner money, he recorded every conversation with Faulkner and Lerner and of course they were not quite as meticulous as MON and that is why they settled. one set of lawyers had a complete dossier, the other set had virtualy nothing because RL and Faulkner did not bother to take notes. MON maintains that he has the goods on Lerner and Faulkner but he signed away his right to publish for 5 years. He will complete his Biography and then the MON version of the truth will be out.
Ivan Gaskell @IvanGaskell1 #Avfc 0 #safc 0 Martin Oneill:"The booing was a sideshow in the gr8 scheme of things. I left this club in gr8 shape, with gr8 players"19m Ivan Gaskell @IvanGaskell1 #Avfc 0 #safc Martin Oneill:" Villa fans haven't heard the full story behind me leaving,I didn't leave them in the lurch,but in gr8 shape"
Quote from: Greg N'Ash on April 21, 2012, 01:07:53 PMQuote from: john2710 on April 21, 2012, 01:00:44 PMQuote from: hawkeye on April 21, 2012, 12:10:03 AMThe real arguement came down to the Milner transfer, not exactly news but he insisted that he could use the Milner money, he recorded every conversation with Faulkner and Lerner and of course they were not quite as meticulous as MON and that is why they settled. one set of lawyers had a complete dossier, the other set had virtualy nothing because RL and Faulkner did not bother to take notes. MON maintains that he has the goods on Lerner and Faulkner but he signed away his right to publish for 5 years. He will complete his Biography and then the MON version of the truth will be out.If that is anything near the truth & I suspect it is, it shows MON was preparing an exit in advance. Once he'd got his proof for the constructive dismissal case, he triggered the exit, the fact that the timing delivered the most disruption possible was an added bonus. It was rumored around February that he was preparing to walk, if he was unhappy he could of just walked. As it was he won on all counts;1. Leaves with managerial reputation intact2. Is vindicated in court by constructive dismissal claim3. Gets paid while he watches us fall apart.4. Gets another job where the process starts again, Sunderland be warned. Doesn't ring true to me. If it was then Lerner and Co would be well within their rights to broadcast the tricks he was up to. What sort of chairman would employ a manager who tapes private telephone conversations?Recording conversations is grounds for dismissal where I work.