But keep Bent, sign Dost as the big man option and have Gabby and Weimann too and I'm happy.
It makes no sense to me that Randy would, after cutting off large investment in the squad and selling all our better players, suddenly decide to start investing in the playing squad again. That would be completely stupid and nonsensical.
Quote from: picicata on April 10, 2012, 09:23:53 PMIt makes no sense to me that Randy would, after cutting off large investment in the squad and selling all our better players, suddenly decide to start investing in the playing squad again. That would be completely stupid and nonsensical.Have to agree with that. It would make no sense to suddenly start having grand plans again. If the wage structure is paramount then the transfer fee-to-salary ratio would preclude any large purchases i.e. a big name signing = a big salary. Or if we did make a large purchase it would, like the Bent signing, incur cutbacks and enforced sales in subsequent transfer windows.
Quote from: Vanilla on April 11, 2012, 03:47:22 PMQuote from: picicata on April 10, 2012, 09:23:53 PMIt makes no sense to me that Randy would, after cutting off large investment in the squad and selling all our better players, suddenly decide to start investing in the playing squad again. That would be completely stupid and nonsensical.Have to agree with that. It would make no sense to suddenly start having grand plans again. If the wage structure is paramount then the transfer fee-to-salary ratio would preclude any large purchases i.e. a big name signing = a big salary. Or if we did make a large purchase it would, like the Bent signing, incur cutbacks and enforced sales in subsequent transfer windows. Not necessarily.Randy has seen that investemnt in good young players can yield good rewards, both in terms of results and sell on value. What he has also seen is paying high wages to older players leaves you stuck with them. If we target two young players at £10m each, who between them earn Heskey's £60k a week, it makes financial aswell as footballing sense, so I wouldn't be surprised to see him sanction such deals.
It makes sense when you put it like that, in the context of Young and Downing, but then we've also spent money on other young players like Davies and Delph and got our fingers burnt. It also depends on McLeish spotting good young talent and persuading them to join Aston Villa.
Hoping for a big turn around of players this year, but our net spend will be low. very low.Can see:Dunne, Collins, Ireland, Warnock, Heskey (free), Cuellar (free), Guzan (free), Nzogbia (if Eck stays), One of Gabby or Bent, Delfouneso leaving. Who we bring in will be worrying though.
I had to keep comparing us to them, but Newcastle had a massive turn over this season-Out: Forster, Enrique, Smith, Barton, Nolan, Routledge, RangerIn: Elliot, Santon, Cabaye, Marveux, Obertan, Ba, CisseReplaced every one of them, spent about £10m net and reduced their wage bill massively to compensate.That's without counting Carroll from the January previous.It shows you can improve quality on a little budget and lower the wage bill.
Quote from: JJ-AV on April 11, 2012, 08:18:08 PMI had to keep comparing us to them, but Newcastle had a massive turn over this season-Out: Forster, Enrique, Smith, Barton, Nolan, Routledge, RangerIn: Elliot, Santon, Cabaye, Marveux, Obertan, Ba, CisseReplaced every one of them, spent about £10m net and reduced their wage bill massively to compensate.That's without counting Carroll from the January previous.It shows you can improve quality on a little budget and lower the wage bill. It can be done. Scouting networks are pivitol in this, and it's something I would have trusted Houllier with. MON was hopeless with his network, not sure about McLeish's either...