Quote from: dave.woodhall on April 06, 2012, 10:58:41 AMQuote from: Irish villain on April 06, 2012, 10:43:22 AMQuote from: Monty on April 06, 2012, 09:12:38 AMReading those PF statements has just reminded me just how much he needs to stop making football decisions. Doesn't have a single clue, not a single one.How did he get the job? Did he sleep his way to the top or something? I've never warmed to him. Things just went to crap when he joined.In September 2006. Paul Faulkner? Was it not May 2012 he became Chief Exec Dave?
Quote from: Irish villain on April 06, 2012, 10:43:22 AMQuote from: Monty on April 06, 2012, 09:12:38 AMReading those PF statements has just reminded me just how much he needs to stop making football decisions. Doesn't have a single clue, not a single one.How did he get the job? Did he sleep his way to the top or something? I've never warmed to him. Things just went to crap when he joined.In September 2006.
Quote from: Monty on April 06, 2012, 09:12:38 AMReading those PF statements has just reminded me just how much he needs to stop making football decisions. Doesn't have a single clue, not a single one.How did he get the job? Did he sleep his way to the top or something? I've never warmed to him. Things just went to crap when he joined.
Reading those PF statements has just reminded me just how much he needs to stop making football decisions. Doesn't have a single clue, not a single one.
Quote from: Irish villain on April 06, 2012, 11:00:01 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on April 06, 2012, 10:58:41 AMQuote from: Irish villain on April 06, 2012, 10:43:22 AMQuote from: Monty on April 06, 2012, 09:12:38 AMReading those PF statements has just reminded me just how much he needs to stop making football decisions. Doesn't have a single clue, not a single one.How did he get the job? Did he sleep his way to the top or something? I've never warmed to him. Things just went to crap when he joined.In September 2006. Paul Faulkner? Was it not May 2012 he became Chief Exec Dave?He joined Villa when Randy arrived. He became chief executive in May 2010 - before then he'd apparently done the same job but under a different title.
Am I right in thinking that the contract MON signed under Doug allowed him to dictate terms and conditions of his signings?
He joined Villa when Randy arrived. He became chief executive in May 2010 - before then he'd apparently done the same job but under a different title.
Quote from: Chipsticks on April 05, 2012, 03:46:00 PMQuote from: ZoggyAlways on April 05, 2012, 03:42:52 PMWell obviously he should never have been employed in the first place but his sheer cowardice and poor tactics/team selections throughout the season when he had a fully fit squad is why we are where we are but I agree the blame ultimately lies with RandyCall me petty, but I still hold MON responsible as key perpetrator. You are correct but not the flavour of the month. The Poison Dwarf is the cause of all our problems.
Quote from: ZoggyAlways on April 05, 2012, 03:42:52 PMWell obviously he should never have been employed in the first place but his sheer cowardice and poor tactics/team selections throughout the season when he had a fully fit squad is why we are where we are but I agree the blame ultimately lies with RandyCall me petty, but I still hold MON responsible as key perpetrator.
Well obviously he should never have been employed in the first place but his sheer cowardice and poor tactics/team selections throughout the season when he had a fully fit squad is why we are where we are but I agree the blame ultimately lies with Randy
Quote from: stubbsyandy on April 06, 2012, 11:04:26 AMAm I right in thinking that the contract MON signed under Doug allowed him to dictate terms and conditions of his signings?As the sale of the club to Randy was in a fairly advanced stage when Doug signed MON up I'm sure that Randy would have been in on the contract negotiations. So I expect that Randy saw the terms and agreed with them.
Absolute bollocks! Just like your claim that all the staff had a party when he left.
Quote from: nodge on April 06, 2012, 11:41:30 AMAbsolute bollocks! Just like your claim that all the staff had a party when he left.How do you knows that they didn't? We were given that snippet by a very reliable source. Some of the staff had very good reason to celebrate the back of MoN.
Quote from: villajk on April 06, 2012, 01:11:22 PMQuote from: nodge on April 06, 2012, 11:41:30 AMAbsolute bollocks! Just like your claim that all the staff had a party when he left.How do you knows that they didn't? We were given that snippet by a very reliable source. Some of the staff had very good reason to celebrate the back of MoN.I was given a snippet from my niece who still works there. If the staff had a party she wasn't invited and knows nothing about it. In fact, she says the mood was quite the opposite when he left. The people she works with had a lot of time for him.
Quote from: villajk on April 06, 2012, 01:11:22 PMQuote from: nodge on April 06, 2012, 11:41:30 AMAbsolute bollocks! Just like your claim that all the staff had a party when he left.How do you knows that they didn't? We were given that snippet by a very reliable source. Some of the staff had very good reason to celebrate the back of MoN.I was given a snippet from my niece who still works there. If the staff had a party she wasn't invited and knows nothing about it. In fact, she says the mood was quite the opposite when he left. The people she works with had a lot of time for him.I think it's tosh that people still blame him for what's happening now.It's like blaming Ron Saunders for winning the league, having a row with his boss and leaving and then the team gradually get worse over a few years.
Quote from: villajk on April 06, 2012, 01:11:22 PMQuote from: nodge on April 06, 2012, 11:41:30 AMAbsolute bollocks! Just like your claim that all the staff had a party when he left.How do you knows that they didn't? We were given that snippet by a very reliable source. Some of the staff had very good reason to celebrate the back of MoN.That seems a bit odd though. The fact virtually all the managerial team left with him, that many of the players seemed to be in shock and virtually the whole club seemed completely rudderless for a nearly a month after MON walked makes that sound like a bit of mischief.
Quote from: nodge on April 06, 2012, 02:00:17 PMQuote from: villajk on April 06, 2012, 01:11:22 PMQuote from: nodge on April 06, 2012, 11:41:30 AMAbsolute bollocks! Just like your claim that all the staff had a party when he left.How do you knows that they didn't? We were given that snippet by a very reliable source. Some of the staff had very good reason to celebrate the back of MoN.I was given a snippet from my niece who still works there. If the staff had a party she wasn't invited and knows nothing about it. In fact, she says the mood was quite the opposite when he left. The people she works with had a lot of time for him.Believe what you will. It happened.