Sorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.
Sorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.Burn him at the gates of hellLerner and Faulkner are perfectly fine was running up huge losses year on year .All is well with the villa hierachy.Would Faulkner be in charge of say Tesco's if they had multi million pound losses on his patch? if he was in charge
Quote from: richardhubbard on February 29, 2012, 03:08:54 PMSorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.Burn him at the gates of hellLerner and Faulkner are perfectly fine was running up huge losses year on year .All is well with the villa hierachy.Would Faulkner be in charge of say Tesco's if they had multi million pound losses on his patch? if he was in charge Put simply, the bits that faulkner can control such as sponsorship, kit deals etc have improved significantly since he joined. I'm not sure he should be held accountable for contracts that were signed before he was promoted.
Quote from: richardhubbard on February 29, 2012, 03:08:54 PMSorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.Burn him at the gates of hellLerner and Faulkner are perfectly fine was running up huge losses year on year .All is well with the villa hierachy.Would Faulkner be in charge of say Tesco's if they had multi million pound losses on his patch? if he was in charge What the fuck are you babbling on about? Perfectly fine? I said Faulkner and Lerner share the balme did I not? I couldn't have been more explicit. Your gripe is about running up huge losses. Well who chose the players that have cost so much? Who was the visionary that spent so much on average players he hardly used on massive contracts? Many of whom still haunt us or have proved expensive to rid ourselves of and with little return.
Quote from: Mazrim on February 29, 2012, 03:25:16 PMQuote from: richardhubbard on February 29, 2012, 03:08:54 PMSorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.Burn him at the gates of hellLerner and Faulkner are perfectly fine was running up huge losses year on year .All is well with the villa hierachy.Would Faulkner be in charge of say Tesco's if they had multi million pound losses on his patch? if he was in charge What the fuck are you babbling on about? Perfectly fine? I said Faulkner and Lerner share the balme did I not? I couldn't have been more explicit. Your gripe is about running up huge losses. Well who chose the players that have cost so much? Who was the visionary that spent so much on average players he hardly used on massive contracts? Many of whom still haunt us or have proved expensive to rid ourselves of and with little return.MON wanted them, the board told him he could have themMy son wants every toy he sees on TV, if I get them for him and he turns into a spoilt brat and screams "You dont love me anymore" if I then refused him another toy, then who is to blame? me or my son?
Quote from: richardhubbard on February 29, 2012, 03:08:54 PMSorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.He pissed off because he couldn't get his own way and was totally unused to being told what to do, something he hadn't experienced since Cloughie in the 70's.My ex-manager knew him reasonably well at social functions from his time at Leicester.I asked her what she thought of him.'Very opinionated, never wrong and refuses to take anybody else's point of view on board.'I understand how he polarises opinions though, a friend of mine who I drink with post matches approaches the realms of violence if you dare to say anything negative about him.
Quote from: Rip Van Bentfletch on February 29, 2012, 03:23:14 PMQuote from: richardhubbard on February 29, 2012, 03:08:54 PMSorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.He pissed off because he couldn't get his own way and was totally unused to being told what to do, something he hadn't experienced since Cloughie in the 70's.My ex-manager knew him reasonably well at social functions from his time at Leicester.I asked her what she thought of him.'Very opinionated, never wrong and refuses to take anybody else's point of view on board.'I understand how he polarises opinions though, a friend of mine who I drink with post matches approaches the realms of violence if you dare to say anything negative about him.Tell him I said O'Neill is a poof's drink.
Quote from: Dante Lavelli on February 29, 2012, 03:28:49 PMQuote from: richardhubbard on February 29, 2012, 03:08:54 PMSorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.Burn him at the gates of hellLerner and Faulkner are perfectly fine was running up huge losses year on year .All is well with the villa hierachy.Would Faulkner be in charge of say Tesco's if they had multi million pound losses on his patch? if he was in charge Put simply, the bits that faulkner can control such as sponsorship, kit deals etc have improved significantly since he joined. I'm not sure he should be held accountable for contracts that were signed before he was promoted.Didn't someone say yesterday that his previous job at the club was specifically involved with agreeing contracts?
Quote from: MarkM on February 29, 2012, 03:30:59 PMQuote from: Mazrim on February 29, 2012, 03:25:16 PMQuote from: richardhubbard on February 29, 2012, 03:08:54 PMSorry I am wrong , MON a cowadice traitor for take us to sixth and pissing off when he is unhappy.Burn him at the gates of hellLerner and Faulkner are perfectly fine was running up huge losses year on year .All is well with the villa hierachy.Would Faulkner be in charge of say Tesco's if they had multi million pound losses on his patch? if he was in charge What the fuck are you babbling on about? Perfectly fine? I said Faulkner and Lerner share the balme did I not? I couldn't have been more explicit. Your gripe is about running up huge losses. Well who chose the players that have cost so much? Who was the visionary that spent so much on average players he hardly used on massive contracts? Many of whom still haunt us or have proved expensive to rid ourselves of and with little return.MON wanted them, the board told him he could have themMy son wants every toy he sees on TV, if I get them for him and he turns into a spoilt brat and screams "You dont love me anymore" if I then refused him another toy, then who is to blame? me or my son?And look what happened the first time they tried to stop him.