It's compounding the error. Like putting out a fire with Kerosene.You dont get Frank Spencer to drive your £2m F1 car because Reubens Barichello took you to the cleaners.
The £12m spent on managerial compensation is the main reason why we're stuck with McLeish, I suspect.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on February 29, 2012, 10:50:45 AMThe £12m spent on managerial compensation is the main reason why we're stuck with McLeish, I suspect.McLeish signed a three year deal on £2m a year, so getting rid in the summer, if it comes to that, should cost us £4m max.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on February 29, 2012, 10:50:45 AMThe £12m spent on managerial compensation is the main reason why we're stuck with McLeish, I suspect.Sticking with him may well end up costing us a lot more.
Quote from: John M'Zog on February 29, 2012, 11:10:11 AMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on February 29, 2012, 10:50:45 AMThe £12m spent on managerial compensation is the main reason why we're stuck with McLeish, I suspect.McLeish signed a three year deal on £2m a year, so getting rid in the summer, if it comes to that, should cost us £4m max.We don't know that, though.We don't know what the termination clauses in his contract are.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on February 29, 2012, 11:33:08 AMQuote from: John M'Zog on February 29, 2012, 11:10:11 AMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on February 29, 2012, 10:50:45 AMThe £12m spent on managerial compensation is the main reason why we're stuck with McLeish, I suspect.McLeish signed a three year deal on £2m a year, so getting rid in the summer, if it comes to that, should cost us £4m max.We don't know that, though.We don't know what the termination clauses in his contract are.Surely they can't be written in such a way that it costs more to sack him than it does employ him?