"To be fair to the Villa fans they've been fantastic on their away travels, so I can't start criticising them for one particular game
The thing is, he seems to be missing the point, in that a lot of us are most angry, not about what the players turn in in terms of performance, but the way he sends us out to play.Take the Wigan game, for example. It was utter dross, but I am struggling to think of a player who didn't do what was asked of him.They did what the manager told them to do. The problem is that, once again, the manager sent them out to play for a draw, only this time, it wasn't against a top team, it was against the bottom of the league team.Houllier got slaughtered last year for his perceived defeatism in his attitude, but this year we've seen a decent number of actual performances (rather than manager talk) which showed some of the least ambitious football I can remember in 30 plus years of watching Villa.McLeish has always been a defensive, cautious manager, this is what he does. If he's suggesting we need to be a bit patient because he's going to undergo some damascene conversion and turn into Pep Guardiola, then we might as well ditch the bloke now, because that is not going to happen.His post match interviews seem to be getting less and less grounded in reality, too. The last two of them have been the most surreally detached from reality yet. It's hard to show patience when you have a manager who is so clearly on a different planet.What, for example, does he think most fans think when we're playing at a side so utterly shite as Wigan, and we take off Albrighton and bring on Emile Fucking Heskey whilst N'Zogbia and Ireland (who have both fouind a bit of form lately) are left sitting on the bench?What kind of patience is going to combat that negativity? What are we supposed to be patient about, exactly?We now have to go forward without Robbie Keane and Darren Bent, and with Richard Dunne injured. Maybe McLeish will reflect that, had he not been so utterly negative so frequently while we had comparatively few injuries, we'd have a few more points on the board now, rather than go into a run-in with key players missing, morale rock bottom, and a support which seems to, en masse, have turned against him.
The thing is, he seems to be missing the point, in that a lot of us are most angry, not about what the players turn in in terms of performance, but the way he sends us out to play.
Well, as one of the small minority that wouldn't pull the trigger right now, I suppose I should back my position up, so here goes:-1. We all seemed to agree with Houllier's position that there was a fair bit of dead wood/troublemakers at the club and it needed a clearout, yet he hasn't been given the backing by Randy to accomplish that. 2. League position wise we are lower than we should be, but not massively, so it terms of sheer results we're not as bad as some of the performances would lead us to believe.3. I'm not sure changing manager now gains us anything, as we'd have a shitty list of candidates to choose from. That opinion being based on the fact I don't think we will go down.If things haven't improved by the end of the season I'll probably jump on the 'get rid' bandwagon, but until then we gain nothing by acting now. So until then it's better to get behind the team, and manager, for the good of the club.
"It's probably one of the toughest jobs in the Premier League.''