The Villa board just did a really shitty job that summer and should be banned from making future decisions.
Is the Wolves job becoming as toxic as the Villa job was last summer? The more the media announce names in the frame the more affronted the candidates become. The more they approach who then turn them down, the more those who are subsequently approached are offended that they were second third or even fourth choice. Walter Smith has now turned them down for this reason. It's an interesting situation, as you'd think with all the unemployed managers out there they'd be knocking the doors down.
I don't see how having 17 million to spend is limited. Do you think McLeish should have had all the Downing/Young money plus more? I don't think we would be much better off.
I'm not sure why Citeh was the tipping point for people. Bottom line is they're miles better than us. and should we be doing better than where we are?
I doubt he would have got any credit if we had attacked Citeh and took a hammering paulie. This place would have been full of posts calling him tactically niave instead of unadventurous. He's on a loser whatever he does now. It was alwyas going to be a car crash appointment from the start but the next guy is unlikely to have a better record or style of football because good ones won't come under Lerner's conditions
I'm not sure why Citeh was the tipping point for people.
Quote from: Greg N'Ash on February 23, 2012, 11:46:16 PMI'm not sure why Citeh was the tipping point for people. Not exactly the tipping point for me, more that it was further confirmation of my view of McLeish: that, tactically and technically, he just does not have the ability. He doesn't understand the game. I knew it before he arrived, I know it now. Which I why I don't subscribe to the view that he needs to be judged on a full season.