collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 01:27:05 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by Dante Lavelli
[Today at 01:26:34 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Brend'Watkins
[Today at 01:22:36 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Villa in Denmark
[Today at 01:20:48 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by dr.chekov
[Today at 01:20:37 PM]


Re: John McGinn by danno
[Today at 01:19:19 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Villa in Denmark
[Today at 01:17:09 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Holy Trinity
[Today at 01:16:39 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: AVFC statement - McLeish sacked.  (Read 1841964 times)

Offline Eigentor

  • Muppet Hero
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1572
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #315 on: February 13, 2012, 10:59:40 AM »
15th place going into mid Feb? He's underperforming, whichever way you want to cut it.

But as mentioned elsewhere, his record so far is about as good as GH was at the same stage last season. And GH had Downing, Young, NRC etc. (though, granted, was less fortunate/even more unfortunate with injuries).

The difference is that GH dared to claim that he had thought of a path forward: ship out the troublemakers and well-paid slackers, and try to build a new team based on a more healthy ethic. AM has his hands tied behind his back, and lacks the team-building experience and knowledge of GH. Thus hope is reduced. But in terms of points on board, he's no worse than the Frenchman.

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74638
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #316 on: February 13, 2012, 11:01:39 AM »
15th place going into mid Feb? He's underperforming, whichever way you want to cut it.

But as mentioned elsewhere, his record so far is about as good as GH was at the same stage last season. And GH had Downing, Young, NRC etc. (though, granted, was less fortunate/even more unfortunate with injuries).

The difference is that GH dared to claim that he had thought of a path forward: ship out the troublemakers and well-paid slackers, and try to build a new team based on a more healthy ethic. AM has his hands tied behind his back, and lacks the team-building experience and knowledge of GH. Thus hope is reduced. But in terms of points on board, he's no worse than the Frenchman.

Don't forget, Houllier was parachuted into a club in utter disarray after the season had started.

McLeish had practically the whole summer and pre-season, and had the chance to get his own players in.

Against Man United at home last season, in the midst of the worst injury crisis in years, we were forced to start with Hogg and Bannan in the middle, but we had a right go at them. McLeish's approach would be entirely different.

Offline Jimbo

  • Member
  • Posts: 11606
  • Location: Hell
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #317 on: February 13, 2012, 11:02:35 AM »
Mick McCarthy has been booted out by the dogheads. Would anyone swap him for McLeish for the rest of the season?

Offline VinnieChase84

  • Member
  • Posts: 3033
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #318 on: February 13, 2012, 11:03:34 AM »
The scary thought is if he were to go you just know that Steve Bruce would come in!
I also know for a fact that Bruce was desperate for the Villa job when it was available last time!

Offline Reuben

  • Member
  • Posts: 1336
  • Location: Nr Stockport
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #319 on: February 13, 2012, 11:04:58 AM »
Mick McCarthy has been booted out by the dogheads. Would anyone swap him for McLeish for the rest of the season?
No

If we are to get rid then I'd prefer MacDonald/Cowans to see out the season

Offline VinnieChase84

  • Member
  • Posts: 3033
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #320 on: February 13, 2012, 11:05:08 AM »
I see Wolves have acted swiftly.
Now would be a perfect time to get rid of AM as we have a two week break now

Offline spk

  • Member
  • Posts: 657
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #321 on: February 13, 2012, 11:09:22 AM »
This may have been said before,I dont know and dare I say it,what about poaching Houghton from sha?

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74638
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #322 on: February 13, 2012, 11:10:14 AM »
This may have been said before,I dont know and dare I say it,what about poaching Houghton from sha?

If the choice were "go forward with Hughton or McLeish", I'd take Hughton every single time.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #323 on: February 13, 2012, 11:12:29 AM »
McLeish had practically the whole summer and pre-season, and had the chance to get his own players in.

That time doesn't help too much when he had no money to spend.

Offline spk

  • Member
  • Posts: 657
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #324 on: February 13, 2012, 11:13:03 AM »
Too right,his record at both nufc and sha is excellent,decent level headed ambitous young manager,would be great for us.

Offline mattjpa

  • Member
  • Posts: 1756
  • Location: Middle Earth
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #325 on: February 13, 2012, 11:14:18 AM »
Great post irish, sums up how i feel as well. This is prob a post for the post match thread but ill share it here as it probably falls on McLeish to address:
It struck me early on during the game and thus I looked out for it during the match but I noticed time and time again how the players were only interested in hitting the ball forward aimlessly. This ranged from 50-50headers on the half way line to defenders playing the ball out from defence, to clearances from corners. Just time and time again forward balls to players under pressure which almost always came back. It was like they didnt want the ball and were just desperate for it not to be them that lost it so hit it in the direction of someone else. I then thought about a highlight reel (i think it was the neviller that put it together) of Swansea that showed their players dropping shoulders, defenders taking risks, passing back, forward, playing in triangles, 20-30 passes before attempting to breach a defence - anything just to hit a man in a good position and not loose the ball, to make some space and try to play football. Technically, i would say they are worse footballers than we have but have a different mindset and think this is probably down to confidence. We defend so deep, our strikers are so isolated, I cannot believe AMC sets us up to play like this.
The problem is how do you arrest a complete lack of confidence? MON has done it at sunderland and they are a completely different team. Our squad is capable of what sunderland have done of late but if the management are incapable of arresting this slide they either need to go or need an addition that is - a man motivator or sports psycologist or something.


Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74638
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #326 on: February 13, 2012, 11:14:47 AM »
McLeish had practically the whole summer and pre-season, and had the chance to get his own players in.

That time doesn't help too much when he had no money to spend.

He managed to spend £18m, John. That's not a massive amount, and he lost two players in the summer, but it's still money.

The no money argument doesn't really stack up too well, anyway, when you consider how little he's getting out of the players he does have.

He had a £20m striker up front yesterday, who must have touched the ball about three times all afternoon.

We are just so ambitionless. Yesterday I was cringeing watching that nonsense.

Offline VillaAlways

  • Member
  • Posts: 6704
  • GM : 23.10.2016
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #327 on: February 13, 2012, 11:15:48 AM »
This may have been said before,I dont know and dare I say it,what about poaching Houghton from sha?
I'd love it Unfortunately the board are so stupid they wouldn't dare because they think we would hate him being from Blues

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #328 on: February 13, 2012, 11:20:35 AM »
Wouldn't surprise me to see Steve bruce at wolves- they have acted fast and given themselves a chance to turn things around but randy I fear can't see the wood for the trees and probably thinks everything is fine and dandy if he believed mcleishs ridiculous aftermath comments yesterday.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: Should AM be sacked ?
« Reply #329 on: February 13, 2012, 11:22:03 AM »
McLeish had practically the whole summer and pre-season, and had the chance to get his own players in.

That time doesn't help too much when he had no money to spend.

He managed to spend £18m, John. That's not a massive amount, and he lost two players in the summer, but it's still money.

The no money argument doesn't really stack up too well, anyway, when you consider how little he's getting out of the players he does have.

He had a £20m striker up front yesterday, who must have touched the ball about three times all afternoon.

We are just so ambitionless. Yesterday I was cringeing watching that nonsense.

I agree to an extent, but the squad now is noticably weaker than the one that finished 9th last season.  When you take into account than none of the departures were down to him and the relatively small amount of money available to find replacements, then it is a contributing factor.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal