Robbie Keane > Pires
This £500 - 750K that I keep seeing bandied about...is it definite or is it just a figure someone made up and is now being taken as gospel by everyone who is against this move?
Quote from: Chas N'Dave Cooper on January 10, 2012, 10:15:11 AMThis £500 - 750K that I keep seeing bandied about...is it definite or is it just a figure someone made up and is now being taken as gospel by everyone who is against this move?It's been reported on the press - Birmingham Mail
Quote from: N'ZMAV on January 10, 2012, 09:56:04 AMRobbie Keane > PiresIn programming and mathematical terms that statement means Robbie Keane is greater than Pires. Is that what you are saying?
Quote from: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 10:02:16 AMQuote from: N'ZMAV on January 10, 2012, 09:56:04 AMRobbie Keane > PiresIn programming and mathematical terms that statement means Robbie Keane is greater than Pires. Is that what you are saying? I think the statement: 'Keane < Pires' is also mathematically correct when you are looking at alphabetical/numerical values. If you take each letter to correspond with a numerical chronological equivalent eg A=1, B=2, C=3 etc. then the letters in 'Keane' will give you a total of 36, and those in 'Pires' 67.As any fule kno if you must then add these digits together to get the lucky numbers. This gives Keane a final digit of 9, a great number for a striker I think you must admit, whereas Pires equals 13, an unlucky number and akin with a slightly slow, hirsuite Frenchman who is past his best.In conclusion, I think numerically speaking, the Keane deal is a good one for Villa and I can see his inclusion in the team leading to lots of goals.
Quote from: aftab235 on January 10, 2012, 09:02:48 AMQuote from: Pete3206 on January 10, 2012, 01:10:00 AMHow about, let's give him a chance. Back up for 2 months, hardly the end of the world.Except that about half a million pounds of supporters money down the drain for someone who is unlikely to play and if he does unlikely to contribute anything at all. I remember his last appearance at VP playing for Liverpool.As Ozz points out above if his contribution helps us win a few points and finish a couple of places higher than we would have without him then we'll make a profit on the move.
Quote from: Pete3206 on January 10, 2012, 01:10:00 AMHow about, let's give him a chance. Back up for 2 months, hardly the end of the world.Except that about half a million pounds of supporters money down the drain for someone who is unlikely to play and if he does unlikely to contribute anything at all. I remember his last appearance at VP playing for Liverpool.
How about, let's give him a chance. Back up for 2 months, hardly the end of the world.
Robbie Keane was always going to play for us at one point. We've been linked with him practically every year since he became a professional.