Quote from: Merv on December 06, 2011, 09:40:34 AMThe more I think about it, the more I think that the players GH had targeted to move on need to leave before we get anywhere.Despite all his (mostly PR related) gaffes and faults, Houllier had the right idea and was, I believe, taking us in a good direction. I think his intention was to ship out a lot of the hoofers and loafers and bring in some more proper footballers (funds allowing) People who write his reign off as as disaster are well wide of the mark in my view, and the football, whilst not perfect, was way better to watch than this sub-MON negative anti-football we're having to endure now. It really was bad luck when his ticker played up again.
The more I think about it, the more I think that the players GH had targeted to move on need to leave before we get anywhere.
Quote from: nick harper on December 06, 2011, 08:10:11 AMI think the defence get unfairly maligned at times. ...The problems lie in a lack of movement and poor quality in midfield. None of them are prepared to take the ball off the back four and take responsibility ... which is why I couldn't understand why Petrov didn't start on Sat.Agree with you about Petrov on Saturday but the rest I think is wrong.My 'take' is that our potential potency in the MF is being negated by crap defending: not the "ugly" stuff as you say but in ball-distribution and player positioning. It means the MF are either cut out of the game (by the long hoof) or spending too much time covering for their defensive colleagues.The team needs a new back four, frankly; one in which Clark is a fixture and in which we have dependable FB who can both attack and defend.When we get to the end of the various short-term loan periods in January, and with Lichaj fit again, the manager should be bold and play some of these young assets; trade on their enthusiasm, fitness and association with the club to get the extra performance required; maybe retaining Dunne alongside Clark as the experienced player.
I think the defence get unfairly maligned at times. ...The problems lie in a lack of movement and poor quality in midfield. None of them are prepared to take the ball off the back four and take responsibility ... which is why I couldn't understand why Petrov didn't start on Sat.
Its just so depressing whenever i see another gamelast night both Fulham and 'The Mighty Reds YNWA' you could see the formation, you could see their style of play and the game ebbed and flowed backwards and forwards and although not the best game in the world it was pleasant on the eye and enjoyable.Ours is just painful to watchI was asked if this is the worst i have seen us play and i have to admit it is
Quote from: EffDee on December 06, 2011, 08:52:07 AMQuote from: nick harper on December 06, 2011, 08:10:11 AMI think the defence get unfairly maligned at times. ...The problems lie in a lack of movement and poor quality in midfield. None of them are prepared to take the ball off the back four and take responsibility ... which is why I couldn't understand why Petrov didn't start on Sat.Agree with you about Petrov on Saturday but the rest I think is wrong.My 'take' is that our potential potency in the MF is being negated by crap defending: not the "ugly" stuff as you say but in ball-distribution and player positioning. It means the MF are either cut out of the game (by the long hoof) or spending too much time covering for their defensive colleagues.The team needs a new back four, frankly; one in which Clark is a fixture and in which we have dependable FB who can both attack and defend.When we get to the end of the various short-term loan periods in January, and with Lichaj fit again, the manager should be bold and play some of these young assets; trade on their enthusiasm, fitness and association with the club to get the extra performance required; maybe retaining Dunne alongside Clark as the experienced player.I think the defence get unfairly maligned at times. Agreed they're not the best footballers in the world but they do the defensive ugly side pretty well. All are prepared to throw their bodies in the way for the team and our defensive record is improved this season.The problems lie in a lack of movement and poor quality in midfield. None of them are prepared to take the ball off the back four and take responsibility. Houllier made that a cornerstone of the way he wanted the team to play and we kept the ball much better as a result.Confidence is also key of course and most of the players, particularly the younger ones, look like they don't want the ball at the moment - which is why I couldn't understand why Petrov didn't start on Sat.
During the first half Saturday, Warnock sold the man closing him down a nice dummy and opened up a bit of space down the left flank. Looking up the pitch you saw Gabby running away from him at the speed of light (not knocking him, that's most likely what he's told to do) and not another Villa player within 40 yards to pass to.It was us under McLeish in a nutshell, the only option Warnock had was to belt it up the line and he couldn't even manage that, spooning it out of play. What made me even more angry was that the incident had made feel sympathy for that useless prick Warnock.
Quote from: Lee N'B on December 06, 2011, 11:10:10 AMDuring the first half Saturday, Warnock sold the man closing him down a nice dummy and opened up a bit of space down the left flank. Looking up the pitch you saw Gabby running away from him at the speed of light (not knocking him, that's most likely what he's told to do) and not another Villa player within 40 yards to pass to.It was us under McLeish in a nutshell, the only option Warnock had was to belt it up the line and he couldn't even manage that, spooning it out of play. What made me even more angry was that the incident had made feel sympathy for that useless prick Warnock.The aimless booting up field is the most spirit sapping thing about where we are today.I found myself on Saturday wincing every time we had the ball, pretty much, because I just *knew* it was going to happen
Nah, the crowd decided they hated him the minute he left, not much chance of that.Newcastle, maybe. Also, he was apparently keen on a move from Sunderland to a Turkish club before we came in for him.
Stan made one interesting point that had some merit. Said Bent is a luxury we are not presently utilising. Would probably be better off if we sold him for £25m, and spent the money on two good attacking fullbacks, or two good midfielders. Difficult to disagree, in my opinion.
Sell Bent!!??? Why because the manager is dire and cannot bring him into the game. Do me a favour......lets get rid of the problem and thats AM.