collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Re: Jacob Ramsey by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 05:53:52 PM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 05:52:17 PM]


Re: Leon Bailey by VinnieChase84
[Today at 05:51:55 PM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by jwarry
[Today at 05:51:00 PM]


Re: Leon Bailey by paul_e
[Today at 05:50:45 PM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by Somniloquism
[Today at 05:46:15 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 05:45:38 PM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 05:42:38 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread  (Read 99378 times)

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74545
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #330 on: September 26, 2011, 10:21:54 PM »
Most people I've spoken to today thought that Delph was our best player apart from Bannan.

Maybe he wasn't that bad after all.

I saw Robbie Savage bigging him up on MOTD2, and was very surprised.

Then I remembered, it was Robbie Savage.

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36437
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #331 on: September 26, 2011, 10:50:46 PM »
Delph took the wrong option a couple of times but I thought that in the second half his industry was a large part of our improvement. There's plenty of room for improvement but I've been surprised at how much criticism he's received.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30233
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #332 on: September 26, 2011, 10:55:18 PM »
Delph took the wrong option a couple of times but I thought that in the second half his industry was a large part of our improvement. There's plenty of room for improvement but I've been surprised at how much criticism he's received.

I'm not surprised, there's some who were even criticising Hutton after 2 games. N'Zogbia and Ireland have been the two main disapointments so far this season and Ireland put more of a shift in yesterday and looked a better player for it.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #333 on: September 26, 2011, 11:35:16 PM »
Delph hasn't set the world on fire, but is hardly the biggest problem in the team.

Offline Chinchilla Bathhouse

  • Member
  • Posts: 2291
  • GM : 25.01.2020
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #334 on: September 27, 2011, 12:49:33 AM »
Second half we played better than the first half, but that doesn't mean it was any good. It just means it was slightly better than dross. People saying they saw big improvement second half and were pleased with McLeish are fucking mental, we didn't have a shot on target in open play for christ sake and we played ok for about 15 minutes. Some people must be easily pleased.

And some people are easily displeased.  They even seem to enjoy it.  If I recall, BCV, you practically had the bingo markers and bedsheets out the moment McLeish was appointed, so it's no surprise you're refusing to spot any signs of improvement.  If the guy won us the FA Cup this season you'd complain that his tie was a bit wonky during the presentation.  You seriously couldn't see any improvement in the second half?  After that diabolical first half?  And you call us "mental"?  (Actually, we're all mental - it means "of the mind".  You probably mean "mentally retarded" or "mentally impaired").  I'm not saying we're playing well, I've been completely underwhelmed by our start to the season, but there were definite signs in the second half that we are capable of playing decent football.  I don't know how you can dispute there was a "big improvement".  No one's saying we're suddenly world beaters, just that we look like we might have a clue after all.  I'll take any crumb of comfort at the moment.  Why do you insist on being negative even when there are positives to be found?  Be gone, you miserable man, and follow Small Heath, who will provide you with the misery you so clearly crave, to a level you never thought possible.

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41445
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #335 on: September 27, 2011, 02:54:40 AM »
Second half we played better than the first half, but that doesn't mean it was any good. It just means it was slightly better than dross. People saying they saw big improvement second half and were pleased with McLeish are fucking mental, we didn't have a shot on target in open play for christ sake and we played ok for about 15 minutes. Some people must be easily pleased.

Other than it being more like 20-25 minutes, I pretty much agree.

QPR are a poor side.

A poor side playing with confidence. I look forward to a Villa side doing the same.

Offline TimTheVillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 4447
  • Location: Location
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #336 on: September 27, 2011, 08:19:17 AM »
Second half we played better than the first half, but that doesn't mean it was any good. It just means it was slightly better than dross. People saying they saw big improvement second half and were pleased with McLeish are fucking mental, we didn't have a shot on target in open play for christ sake and we played ok for about 15 minutes. Some people must be easily pleased.

Other than it being more like 20-25 minutes, I pretty much agree.

QPR are a poor side.

A poor side playing with confidence. I look forward to a Villa side doing the same.

QPR are a decent striker, GK and central defender short of being an average side.

Agree, they have the 'we're in the Prem now don't you know' confidence while, the Villa are -  'we're trying to get our shit together for our new Manager, we do have the talent - honest' .

16,700 gate - their best so far, they're a London version of Blackpool, a club who used to be decent but just aren't anymore.

Oh and Albrighton - what's happened to him in 2011 ??



 

Offline richard moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 12029
  • Location: Chichester, West Sussex
  • GM : Jan, 2013
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #337 on: September 27, 2011, 08:21:41 AM »
Second half we played better than the first half, but that doesn't mean it was any good. It just means it was slightly better than dross. People saying they saw big improvement second half and were pleased with McLeish are fucking mental, we didn't have a shot on target in open play for christ sake and we played ok for about 15 minutes. Some people must be easily pleased.

Other than it being more like 20-25 minutes, I pretty much agree.

QPR are a poor side.

A poor side playing with confidence. I look forward to a Villa side doing the same.

Well, exactly. Of course they are a poor side when one considers things overall but that makes no allowance at all for promoted teams often getting off to good starts, them being in form and the 'talk of the papers' for most of this week. Even Sky cottoned on to that and approached the whole of their coverage from the angle of 'promoted team on the rise with lots of good new players'. If we think back to last season, Blackpool were, by definition, a poor team overall as they were relegated, but you wouldn't have wanted to face them at this stage last season when they were rolling quite a few good teams over as I recollect....

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36437
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #338 on: September 27, 2011, 08:58:09 AM »
QPR are not a bad side at all, I'm not sure what the evidence is for them being poor. Since the transfer window they've outplayed Newcastle and Wolves and us for 45 minutes. I think you're being a little condescending to call them poor.

Offline UsualSuspect

  • Member
  • Posts: 1571
  • Location: Deep Undercover In Old Warley....
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #339 on: September 27, 2011, 09:23:08 AM »
TBH as far as some of the critisism of Hutton goes, as an experienced player I expect him to have a basic idea of what he should be doing and be fit.

In the general world of business if you are interviewed for a job, get the job and start then the company expect you to deliver pretty much right away, not say to you just potter along for a bit and if you're a bit shit that's okay

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36437
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #340 on: September 27, 2011, 09:37:15 AM »
TBH as far as some of the critisism of Hutton goes, as an experienced player I expect him to have a basic idea of what he should be doing and be fit.

In the general world of business if you are interviewed for a job, get the job and start then the company expect you to deliver pretty much right away, not say to you just potter along for a bit and if you're a bit shit that's okay


What a load of bollocks, firstly the analogy is irrelevant and secondly it's not true. In any job you will have a period of settling in and acclimatisation and elite sport is not the same as business.

Offline Merv

  • Member
  • Posts: 4192
  • Location: Undercover
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #341 on: September 27, 2011, 09:58:20 AM »
QPR aren't bad. What I'll add to the debate is that Sunday was probably the worst time to face them - new signings playing, off the back of an impressive away victory, Sky TV cameras at Loftus Road, big occasion for them, etc. The day was all about QPR.


Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35532
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #342 on: September 27, 2011, 10:01:23 AM »
QPR aren't bad. What I'll add to the debate is that Sunday was probably the worst time to face them - new signings playing, off the back of an impressive away victory, Sky TV cameras at Loftus Road, big occasion for them, etc. The day was all about QPR.



True, and usually we oblige and roll over so I'm happy to see we've got a backbone.

It goes a long way in this league.

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #343 on: September 27, 2011, 10:29:36 AM »
Delph took the wrong option a couple of times but I thought that in the second half his industry was a large part of our improvement. There's plenty of room for improvement but I've been surprised at how much criticism he's received.

I'm not surprised, there's some who were even criticising Hutton after 2 games. N'Zogbia and Ireland have been the two main disapointments so far this season and Ireland put more of a shift in yesterday and looked a better player for it.

I agree, and that could largely explain why we've been a bit blunt attacking wise so far this season.

As for Delph, I thought he started the season well and then had a stinker or two, particularly at Everton.  Problem with that is with some fans you need to put in a McGrath like performance to make up for it or your 'shit again', when in truth I think he's done OK the last couple of games.  Not great - just OK! 

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10080
  • Location: Peckham
Re: Queens Park Rangers v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread
« Reply #344 on: September 27, 2011, 10:43:21 AM »
QPR aren't bad. What I'll add to the debate is that Sunday was probably the worst time to face them - new signings playing, off the back of an impressive away victory, Sky TV cameras at Loftus Road, big occasion for them, etc. The day was all about QPR.


This result wasn't the end of the world, it was very disappointing, but I saw a lot of positives in the second half. Seems like the players are responding to a good kick up the arse, shame they need this though.

Ireland wasn't too bad. N'Zogbia was poor, again, and Albrighton doesn't seem himself, there's obviously something wrong there, or maybe he just needs games. Impressed with the charector. However, most of these early season games should have been wins, we're lacking something. Square pegs... round holes...

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal