Quote from: Iago on July 14, 2011, 08:45:14 AMI agree with the club's statement about replacements being available. And that, in my opinion, is the most important action after our recent departures.It is going to be an interesting few weeks at VP.4 weeks until the start of the season. They need to get interesting really quickly.
I agree with the club's statement about replacements being available. And that, in my opinion, is the most important action after our recent departures.It is going to be an interesting few weeks at VP.
Liverpool fans saying downing is better than ash young ..fook off ..
Quote from: Risso on July 14, 2011, 11:07:42 AMQuote from: Mazrim on July 14, 2011, 11:01:12 AMQuote from: mazrimsbruv on July 14, 2011, 10:55:32 AMThe level of denial on this thread beggars belief.How can selling two of our three best players in one summer be good for AVFC?Why do most of you assume that all the Young and Downing money will be reinvested in the squad? It’s clear what is happening here. O’Neill left because the Milner money was not being reinvested but used instead to service the Club’s debt, which was spiralling up towards the £100 million mark. Lerner had to use this money unexpectedly to buy Bent to get us out of the shit in January and has now recouped that money from the sale of Young. He was only willing to use some of it for a Keeper out of necessity.This is why there have been no approaches for any players, because AM has to generate his own transfer funds. And before you accuse me of re-hashing Mat Kendrick’s articles, see my previous posts on the ‘Lerner FFP’ thread and the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, which were both prior to Kendrick’s reports and tweets. (In fact I’m considering suing him for plagiarism!).This is why the statements ‘Bent was bought with the Milner money’ and ‘The Ash money was used to pay for Bent’ are not conflicting statements!Btw, my prediction on the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, of a net spend of minus £10 million is looking pretty good right now. In fact at the moment it’s looking like wild optimism. I think you know I dont agree with a lot of what you're saying. But you havent been proven wrong yet either.I hope you will be and I know you do too.Too many Mazrims there, it's messing with my head man.I'm good Mazrim, he is evil Mazrim.It's more exciting than James and Tom.
Quote from: Mazrim on July 14, 2011, 11:01:12 AMQuote from: mazrimsbruv on July 14, 2011, 10:55:32 AMThe level of denial on this thread beggars belief.How can selling two of our three best players in one summer be good for AVFC?Why do most of you assume that all the Young and Downing money will be reinvested in the squad? It’s clear what is happening here. O’Neill left because the Milner money was not being reinvested but used instead to service the Club’s debt, which was spiralling up towards the £100 million mark. Lerner had to use this money unexpectedly to buy Bent to get us out of the shit in January and has now recouped that money from the sale of Young. He was only willing to use some of it for a Keeper out of necessity.This is why there have been no approaches for any players, because AM has to generate his own transfer funds. And before you accuse me of re-hashing Mat Kendrick’s articles, see my previous posts on the ‘Lerner FFP’ thread and the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, which were both prior to Kendrick’s reports and tweets. (In fact I’m considering suing him for plagiarism!).This is why the statements ‘Bent was bought with the Milner money’ and ‘The Ash money was used to pay for Bent’ are not conflicting statements!Btw, my prediction on the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, of a net spend of minus £10 million is looking pretty good right now. In fact at the moment it’s looking like wild optimism. I think you know I dont agree with a lot of what you're saying. But you havent been proven wrong yet either.I hope you will be and I know you do too.Too many Mazrims there, it's messing with my head man.
Quote from: mazrimsbruv on July 14, 2011, 10:55:32 AMThe level of denial on this thread beggars belief.How can selling two of our three best players in one summer be good for AVFC?Why do most of you assume that all the Young and Downing money will be reinvested in the squad? It’s clear what is happening here. O’Neill left because the Milner money was not being reinvested but used instead to service the Club’s debt, which was spiralling up towards the £100 million mark. Lerner had to use this money unexpectedly to buy Bent to get us out of the shit in January and has now recouped that money from the sale of Young. He was only willing to use some of it for a Keeper out of necessity.This is why there have been no approaches for any players, because AM has to generate his own transfer funds. And before you accuse me of re-hashing Mat Kendrick’s articles, see my previous posts on the ‘Lerner FFP’ thread and the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, which were both prior to Kendrick’s reports and tweets. (In fact I’m considering suing him for plagiarism!).This is why the statements ‘Bent was bought with the Milner money’ and ‘The Ash money was used to pay for Bent’ are not conflicting statements!Btw, my prediction on the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, of a net spend of minus £10 million is looking pretty good right now. In fact at the moment it’s looking like wild optimism. I think you know I dont agree with a lot of what you're saying. But you havent been proven wrong yet either.I hope you will be and I know you do too.
The level of denial on this thread beggars belief.How can selling two of our three best players in one summer be good for AVFC?Why do most of you assume that all the Young and Downing money will be reinvested in the squad? It’s clear what is happening here. O’Neill left because the Milner money was not being reinvested but used instead to service the Club’s debt, which was spiralling up towards the £100 million mark. Lerner had to use this money unexpectedly to buy Bent to get us out of the shit in January and has now recouped that money from the sale of Young. He was only willing to use some of it for a Keeper out of necessity.This is why there have been no approaches for any players, because AM has to generate his own transfer funds. And before you accuse me of re-hashing Mat Kendrick’s articles, see my previous posts on the ‘Lerner FFP’ thread and the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, which were both prior to Kendrick’s reports and tweets. (In fact I’m considering suing him for plagiarism!).This is why the statements ‘Bent was bought with the Milner money’ and ‘The Ash money was used to pay for Bent’ are not conflicting statements!Btw, my prediction on the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, of a net spend of minus £10 million is looking pretty good right now. In fact at the moment it’s looking like wild optimism.
Here, here,At least we'll hopefully have a player who wants to be here rather than a half hearted pussycat with little spineWell done to all concerned in making a profit on the deal
Quote from: Mazrim on July 14, 2011, 11:15:15 AMQuote from: Risso on July 14, 2011, 11:07:42 AMQuote from: Mazrim on July 14, 2011, 11:01:12 AMQuote from: mazrimsbruv on July 14, 2011, 10:55:32 AMThe level of denial on this thread beggars belief.How can selling two of our three best players in one summer be good for AVFC?Why do most of you assume that all the Young and Downing money will be reinvested in the squad? It’s clear what is happening here. O’Neill left because the Milner money was not being reinvested but used instead to service the Club’s debt, which was spiralling up towards the £100 million mark. Lerner had to use this money unexpectedly to buy Bent to get us out of the shit in January and has now recouped that money from the sale of Young. He was only willing to use some of it for a Keeper out of necessity.This is why there have been no approaches for any players, because AM has to generate his own transfer funds. And before you accuse me of re-hashing Mat Kendrick’s articles, see my previous posts on the ‘Lerner FFP’ thread and the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, which were both prior to Kendrick’s reports and tweets. (In fact I’m considering suing him for plagiarism!).This is why the statements ‘Bent was bought with the Milner money’ and ‘The Ash money was used to pay for Bent’ are not conflicting statements!Btw, my prediction on the ‘Summer Transfer Spend’ thread, of a net spend of minus £10 million is looking pretty good right now. In fact at the moment it’s looking like wild optimism. I think you know I dont agree with a lot of what you're saying. But you havent been proven wrong yet either.I hope you will be and I know you do too.Too many Mazrims there, it's messing with my head man.I'm good Mazrim, he is evil Mazrim.It's more exciting than James and Tom.Ha! Your SuperOptimism ShieldTM is no match for my MegaNegativity BombsTM
Quote from: Stu on July 14, 2011, 11:17:58 AMQuote from: Iago on July 14, 2011, 08:45:14 AMI agree with the club's statement about replacements being available. And that, in my opinion, is the most important action after our recent departures.It is going to be an interesting few weeks at VP.4 weeks until the start of the season. They need to get interesting really quickly.Interestingly the chairman of Wolves said yesterday they had been negotiating the deal for Johnson ever since Blues were relagated yet I hadn't heard a single link until he was having his medical.So who knows who we're in for and how long it will take
Bent will be handing in a transfer request at Christmas... why would he hang around now the two of the main reasons he signed have left.£35m for him, no doubt people would "snap their hands off" for this money.Can this close season get any worse...
Quote from: JUAN PABLO on July 14, 2011, 09:14:15 AMLiverpool fans saying downing is better than ash young ..fook off ..Well to be fair, they would say that. He's not, obviously. He can't cross as well, isn't as fast, doesn't track back, doesn't tackle, isn't as good with the ball at his feet and doesn't have AY's vision for a pass.They need to tell themselves that because Man U got the better player. And for less money. Liverpool have to pay big money to get what they want now, the lustre has gone.
Quote from: VILLALWAYS on July 14, 2011, 11:25:39 AMQuote from: Stu on July 14, 2011, 11:17:58 AMQuote from: Iago on July 14, 2011, 08:45:14 AMI agree with the club's statement about replacements being available. And that, in my opinion, is the most important action after our recent departures.It is going to be an interesting few weeks at VP.4 weeks until the start of the season. They need to get interesting really quickly.Interestingly the chairman of Wolves said yesterday they had been negotiating the deal for Johnson ever since Blues were relagated yet I hadn't heard a single link until he was having his medical.So who knows who we're in for and how long it will takeHave Wolves just lost four first teamers as well?
Quote from: Stu on July 14, 2011, 11:40:42 AMQuote from: VILLALWAYS on July 14, 2011, 11:25:39 AMQuote from: Stu on July 14, 2011, 11:17:58 AMQuote from: Iago on July 14, 2011, 08:45:14 AMI agree with the club's statement about replacements being available. And that, in my opinion, is the most important action after our recent departures.It is going to be an interesting few weeks at VP.4 weeks until the start of the season. They need to get interesting really quickly.Interestingly the chairman of Wolves said yesterday they had been negotiating the deal for Johnson ever since Blues were relagated yet I hadn't heard a single link until he was having his medical.So who knows who we're in for and how long it will takeHave Wolves just lost four first teamers as well?I don't get your point ? All I was saying is who knows who are targets are and how far down the line we are with them