It wouldn't have been too difficult to find out about it. Or to have been more balanced.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 11:01:04 PMQuote from: hilts_coolerking on June 25, 2011, 10:14:36 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 09:42:22 PMIf he admits he's not too well-read on the subject, why write about it?Not much use having a chief football writer at a daily paper who's only allowed to cover Stockport County. He's in the instant opinions business; that's why he writes for a tabloid. Besides, there are still some on here who reckon O'Neill was hard done by.It wouldn't have been too difficult to find out about it. Or to have been more balanced. He'd have to go a long way to be as unbalanced on the subject as you are.
Quote from: hilts_coolerking on June 25, 2011, 10:14:36 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 09:42:22 PMIf he admits he's not too well-read on the subject, why write about it?Not much use having a chief football writer at a daily paper who's only allowed to cover Stockport County. He's in the instant opinions business; that's why he writes for a tabloid. Besides, there are still some on here who reckon O'Neill was hard done by.It wouldn't have been too difficult to find out about it. Or to have been more balanced.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 09:42:22 PMIf he admits he's not too well-read on the subject, why write about it?Not much use having a chief football writer at a daily paper who's only allowed to cover Stockport County. He's in the instant opinions business; that's why he writes for a tabloid. Besides, there are still some on here who reckon O'Neill was hard done by.
If he admits he's not too well-read on the subject, why write about it?
Quote from: Villadawg on June 25, 2011, 11:15:58 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 11:01:04 PMQuote from: hilts_coolerking on June 25, 2011, 10:14:36 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 09:42:22 PMIf he admits he's not too well-read on the subject, why write about it?Not much use having a chief football writer at a daily paper who's only allowed to cover Stockport County. He's in the instant opinions business; that's why he writes for a tabloid. Besides, there are still some on here who reckon O'Neill was hard done by.It wouldn't have been too difficult to find out about it. Or to have been more balanced. He'd have to go a long way to be as unbalanced on the subject as you are.Looks like Ironic Post of the Century has been won already.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 11:19:58 PMQuote from: Villadawg on June 25, 2011, 11:15:58 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 11:01:04 PMQuote from: hilts_coolerking on June 25, 2011, 10:14:36 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 09:42:22 PMIf he admits he's not too well-read on the subject, why write about it?Not much use having a chief football writer at a daily paper who's only allowed to cover Stockport County. He's in the instant opinions business; that's why he writes for a tabloid. Besides, there are still some on here who reckon O'Neill was hard done by.It wouldn't have been too difficult to find out about it. Or to have been more balanced. He'd have to go a long way to be as unbalanced on the subject as you are.Looks like Ironic Post of the Century has been won already. My opinions are balanced by the facts that the support them. Where's the balance in yours?
Quote from: Villadawg on June 25, 2011, 11:32:10 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 11:19:58 PMQuote from: Villadawg on June 25, 2011, 11:15:58 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 11:01:04 PMQuote from: hilts_coolerking on June 25, 2011, 10:14:36 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on June 25, 2011, 09:42:22 PMIf he admits he's not too well-read on the subject, why write about it?Not much use having a chief football writer at a daily paper who's only allowed to cover Stockport County. He's in the instant opinions business; that's why he writes for a tabloid. Besides, there are still some on here who reckon O'Neill was hard done by.It wouldn't have been too difficult to find out about it. Or to have been more balanced. He'd have to go a long way to be as unbalanced on the subject as you are.Looks like Ironic Post of the Century has been won already. My opinions are balanced by the facts that the support them. Where's the balance in yours?Facts you create or lift from sketchy blogs don't count.
My opinions are balanced by the facts that the support them. Where's the balance in yours?
He is at least open about his sources, allowing you to judge for yourself.You may prefer innuendo, but you'd be mistaken if you thought everyone else the same as you.
Quote from: VillainousVillan on June 25, 2011, 11:43:22 PMHe is at least open about his sources, allowing you to judge for yourself.You may prefer innuendo, but you'd be mistaken if you thought everyone else the same as you.The nightclub in Evesham? That's a bit presumptuous, as I've never been. Blathering on about facts and then regularly citing half arsed economics from such esteemed websites as Swiss Butter Mountain or whatever it was might raise questions about ones credibility just a tad, wouldn't you agree?
Quote from: KevinGage on June 26, 2011, 12:21:28 AMQuote from: VillainousVillan on June 25, 2011, 11:43:22 PMHe is at least open about his sources, allowing you to judge for yourself.You may prefer innuendo, but you'd be mistaken if you thought everyone else the same as you.The nightclub in Evesham? That's a bit presumptuous, as I've never been. Blathering on about facts and then regularly citing half arsed economics from such esteemed websites as Swiss Butter Mountain or whatever it was might raise questions about ones credibility just a tad, wouldn't you agree?As I said, he lets you know where his information's from. You choose to deigrate it, which is up to you.There are several millions of pounds in unspoken settlements that indicate that he may be nearer the mark than you, Mr W. and gregnash when it comes to what's happened over the last year or so.As the above looks a bit too much like the innuendo I complained of earlier, let me just confirm that anything I have written is nothing more than conjecture, based on a personal hunch. I can't be bothered to read obscure blogs, or to pretend that I know or knew the mind of any of our departed managers.
Quote from: Villadawg on June 25, 2011, 11:32:10 PMMy opinions are balanced by the facts that the support them. Where's the balance in yours?Your opinions are backed by your interpretation of the facts as you see them, same as everybody else on here.