Stephen Warnock

[Villa in Denmark]

By all accounts they are fully deserving but yes I must not get so bother about things here and there.
Something I look forward to improving next season

You really should give Villatalk a go, they positively frown on topics going off the subject over there, and profanity isn't allowed either. You'd love it.

No profanity? Fuuuuck, that's shit.

Bollocks to that. What a bunch of ******.

[pauliewalnuts]

Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Because Warnock is a high profile commentator on the game, who gets a lot of TV time, and generally expresses well considered, thoughtful opinion.

Gabby is a notorious gobshite and performing moron who does clicks for TalkSport

Jack Grealish is currently playing for someone else. As is Ashley Young.

Serious question - do you think about this obvious nonsense before you (the plural you) post it, or do you just anally expel it, like a strong stream of utter shit that you just can't keep in?

[Chris Harte]

Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Because Warnock is a high profile commentator on the game, who gets a lot of TV time, and generally expresses well considered, thoughtful opinion.

Gabby is a notorious gobshite and performing moron who does clicks for TalkSport

Jack Grealish is currently playing for someone else. As is Ashley Young.

Serious question - do you think about this obvious nonsense before you (the plural you) post it, or do you just anally expel it, like a strong stream of utter shit that you just can't keep in?

The more I see comments with this sort of tone aimed at Footy-Vill the more I think he's actually an AI bot and not a real person, and that everyone else is in on it. I mean, some of the things that are aimed in his/her/its (sorry, don't know what your pronouns are) on the face of it are pretty out of order.

[adrenachrome]

Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Because Warnock is a high profile commentator on the game, who gets a lot of TV time, and generally expresses well considered, thoughtful opinion.

Gabby is a notorious gobshite and performing moron who does clicks for TalkSport

Jack Grealish is currently playing for someone else. As is Ashley Young.

Serious question - do you think about this obvious nonsense before you (the plural you) post it, or do you just anally expel it, like a strong stream of utter shit that you just can't keep in?

I agree with all of this, but Ashley Young was very complementary about us when interviewed about his career after the game.

[pauliewalnuts]

Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Because Warnock is a high profile commentator on the game, who gets a lot of TV time, and generally expresses well considered, thoughtful opinion.

Gabby is a notorious gobshite and performing moron who does clicks for TalkSport

Jack Grealish is currently playing for someone else. As is Ashley Young.

Serious question - do you think about this obvious nonsense before you (the plural you) post it, or do you just anally expel it, like a strong stream of utter shit that you just can't keep in?

I agree with all of this, but Ashley Young was very complementary about us when interviewed about his career after the game.

Oh yes, don't get me wrong, nothing against Ashley Young, he is one of the good guys.

Just pointing out to the Footy-Vil collective why we talk more about one than the other.

[pauliewalnuts]

Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Because Warnock is a high profile commentator on the game, who gets a lot of TV time, and generally expresses well considered, thoughtful opinion.

Gabby is a notorious gobshite and performing moron who does clicks for TalkSport

Jack Grealish is currently playing for someone else. As is Ashley Young.

Serious question - do you think about this obvious nonsense before you (the plural you) post it, or do you just anally expel it, like a strong stream of utter shit that you just can't keep in?

The more I see comments with this sort of tone aimed at Footy-Vill the more I think he's actually an AI bot and not a real person, and that everyone else is in on it. I mean, some of the things that are aimed in his/her/its (sorry, don't know what your pronouns are) on the face of it are pretty out of order.

It's so fucking endless, and it's clearly posted to create exactly the sort of reaction that, ultimately, he (they) end up getting. It's just so obvious.

Either:

1. It's a bot, a collective of people on a wind up, a trolling exercise, something like that, in which case, well, what are you supposed to do? How are you supposed to react to obvious trolling?

2. It isn't the above, it's a genuine poster, in which case, why not treat him (or they) exactly like you would any other poster? If - randomly selected poster - Bad English, someone who has put in the years here, a recognised regular, started posting what FV does, he'd get *exactly* the same response.

So, basically, either it's a wind up, in which case, it reaps what it sews, or it's genuinely a regular poster who believes this stuff, in which case, they can expect to be treated like any other rational poster who posted endless utter rubbish clearly designed to wind people up.

And it's far from just this thread. See, as an example, recent utter rubbish about Morgan Rogers.

[Footy-Vill]

I frequently get the feeling that people who try to minimise my speech or mistreat me are doing so because they don't understand or don't want to hear opinions and ideas that differ from their own or what they want to discuss.
I ask to stop this and treat opinions equally. It's not fair. Furthermore, I believe that it's necessary to respect others' freedom of thought.

It's as like everything that doesn't align is considered nonsensical. Well, that is absurd. It feels like I'm being told to leave if I don't fall in like of thinking the same or I can't ask any questions or have ideas, theories and debates.

At the moment the semi FINAL is coming up tomorrow and there's all sorts to discuss there not least the influence of the Olympicao owner Evangelos Marinakis on the game.
Everyone will have a theory too about the official appointed and can you seriously expect everyone to simply agree and say the same thing?

[Chris Harte]

Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Because Warnock is a high profile commentator on the game, who gets a lot of TV time, and generally expresses well considered, thoughtful opinion.

Gabby is a notorious gobshite and performing moron who does clicks for TalkSport

Jack Grealish is currently playing for someone else. As is Ashley Young.

Serious question - do you think about this obvious nonsense before you (the plural you) post it, or do you just anally expel it, like a strong stream of utter shit that you just can't keep in?

The more I see comments with this sort of tone aimed at Footy-Vill the more I think he's actually an AI bot and not a real person, and that everyone else is in on it. I mean, some of the things that are aimed in his/her/its (sorry, don't know what your pronouns are) on the face of it are pretty out of order.

It's so fucking endless, and it's clearly posted to create exactly the sort of reaction that, ultimately, he (they) end up getting. It's just so obvious.

Not to me, it isn't. But I suppose we all have our views.

Maybe they're autistic, if not an AI bot.

[PeterWithesShin]

I will never understand why people don't just scroll past his posts if they don't like them.

[Footy-Vill]

Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Because Warnock is a high profile commentator on the game, who gets a lot of TV time, and generally expresses well considered, thoughtful opinion.

Gabby is a notorious gobshite and performing moron who does clicks for TalkSport

Jack Grealish is currently playing for someone else. As is Ashley Young.

Serious question - do you think about this obvious nonsense before you (the plural you) post it, or do you just anally expel it, like a strong stream of utter shit that you just can't keep in?

The more I see comments with this sort of tone aimed at Footy-Vill the more I think he's actually an AI bot and not a real person, and that everyone else is in on it. I mean, some of the things that are aimed in his/her/its (sorry, don't know what your pronouns are) on the face of it are pretty out of order.

It's so fucking endless, and it's clearly posted to create exactly the sort of reaction that, ultimately, he (they) end up getting. It's just so obvious.

Ok what do you suggest I do ? Because I think your theory is nonsense and same as others as I'm just an individual for heavens  sake who likes to encourage discussion.

[pauliewalnuts]

Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Because Warnock is a high profile commentator on the game, who gets a lot of TV time, and generally expresses well considered, thoughtful opinion.

Gabby is a notorious gobshite and performing moron who does clicks for TalkSport

Jack Grealish is currently playing for someone else. As is Ashley Young.

Serious question - do you think about this obvious nonsense before you (the plural you) post it, or do you just anally expel it, like a strong stream of utter shit that you just can't keep in?

The more I see comments with this sort of tone aimed at Footy-Vill the more I think he's actually an AI bot and not a real person, and that everyone else is in on it. I mean, some of the things that are aimed in his/her/its (sorry, don't know what your pronouns are) on the face of it are pretty out of order.

It's so fucking endless, and it's clearly posted to create exactly the sort of reaction that, ultimately, he (they) end up getting. It's just so obvious.

Not to me, it isn't. But I suppose we all have our views.

Maybe they're autistic, if not an AI bot.

That's a pretty big shout there, with quite a lot of possible range between the two poles - either, you've got a problem or you're actually software.

[Chris Harte]

I frequently get the feeling that people who try to minimise my speech or mistreat me are doing so because they don't understand or don't want to hear opinions and ideas that differ from their own or what they want to discuss.
I ask to stop this and treat opinions equally. It's not fair. Furthermore, I believe that it's necessary to respect others' freedom of thought.

It's as like everything that doesn't align is considered nonsensical. Well, that is absurd. It feels like I'm being told to leave if I don't fall in like of thinking the same or I can't ask any questions or have ideas, theories and debates.

At the moment the semi FINAL is coming up tomorrow and there's all sorts to discuss there not least the influence of the Olympicao owner Evangelos Marinakis on the game.
Everyone will have a theory too about the official appointed and can you seriously expect everyone to simply agree and say the same thing?

Keep being yourself, Footy-Vill. Don't worry about the hostile curmudgeons in here. We all get to have a say.

[Chris Harte]

Not to me, it isn't. But I suppose we all have our views.

Maybe they're autistic, if not an AI bot.

That's a pretty big shout there, with quite a lot of possible range between the two poles - either, you've got a problem or you're actually software.

I'm off to download an update. Tweek a few naughts and ones.

[Footy-Vill]

What rubbish ?
I said about a nickname for Morgan Rogers then people started being vulgar designed to wind me up !
I really don't get the conspiracy against me
It's preposterous!
Just because I have ideas and theories different to yours you  could be respectful.

[pauliewalnuts]

I frequently get the feeling that people who try to minimise my speech or mistreat me are doing so because they don't understand or don't want to hear opinions and ideas that differ from their own or what they want to discuss.
I ask to stop this and treat opinions equally. It's not fair. Furthermore, I believe that it's necessary to respect others' freedom of thought.

It's as like everything that doesn't align is considered nonsensical. Well, that is absurd. It feels like I'm being told to leave if I don't fall in like of thinking the same or I can't ask any questions or have ideas, theories and debates.

At the moment the semi FINAL is coming up tomorrow and there's all sorts to discuss there not least the influence of the Olympicao owner Evangelos Marinakis on the game.
Everyone will have a theory too about the official appointed and can you seriously expect everyone to simply agree and say the same thing?

Keep being yourself, Footy-Vill. Don't worry about the hostile curmudgeons in here. We all get to have a say.

Yes, absolutely, he should carry on and post what he likes.

And expect people to react to it.