collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by IFWaters
[Today at 03:59:40 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by eamonn
[Today at 03:58:51 PM]


Emi Martinez by Ducksworthy
[Today at 03:57:15 PM]


Victor Lindelöf by Duncan Shaw
[Today at 03:57:06 PM]


Aston Villa v Crystal Palace Pre Match by eamonn
[Today at 03:40:15 PM]


FFP by Paul.S
[Today at 02:57:32 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Stephen Warnock  (Read 26196 times)

Offline Smithy

  • Member
  • Posts: 7212
  • Location: Windsor, Royal Berkshire, la de da
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #105 on: May 08, 2024, 02:20:15 PM »
Am I the only one here thinking that Warnock must be fragile if he's going to let something like that completely demotivate him?

I take on board the poor man management by O'Neill, but Warnock was saying he was in the form of his life, but then this review took all the wind out of his sails. Footballers tend to be alpha male types by all accounts, so why did this affect him to the point that he couldn't get excited about getting to a cup final? Was there nothing in him that would've made him say "I'll show that moron"?

The whole thing just seems odd to me.

I think it can work both ways, which is why man-management isn't "one size fits all".  Clearly MON thought it would motivate him. It did not. At all. For another player, it might.  The fact the other players were telling him to ignore it ahead of the meeting suggests it was a tactic many of the players didn't respond well to. It sounds very "Brian Clough".

I have some sympathy for Warnock over that incident, because I know if I'd been absolutely killing it at work, and my boss pulled me in for a mid-year review only to tell me that actually, I'd only done "ok" but that he expected more, and here are all the things I was doing wrong, I'd have been looking for a new job pretty sharpish.  No one likes working where they feel unappreciated.

We often hear the phrase "lost the dressing room" when teams don't perform for a manager. I think in this case, he "lost the player".

Now, if Warnock had been playing garbage, then fair enough. Underperformers need to know their level is unacceptable. It's professional sport at the end of the day, and performances matter.  But as others have said, his form in that first half the year was excellent.

Online eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33965
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #106 on: May 08, 2024, 02:50:13 PM »
Weird seeing a footballer you're used to being slick and professional (and likeable) on MOTD/Sky etc. who has the platform of a podcast to have carte-blanche to shoot the shit, swear as much as he likes and be totally unguarded and honest about his career.

Horrendous to hear about how half-arsed and unprofessional O'Neill was. Absolute chancer as Rudy said.

Interesting to note as big as he thought Villa are, the reaction of fans at Leeds was even more impressive to him. I guess it'd be the same at Newcastle. Of all the sleeping giants, those two clubs seem to have the obsession that players are wow-ed by. Can't we get prospective signings to log onto H&V for a month to see how mental we are?

Online Tayls_7

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4644
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Lincoln
  • GM : 14.10.2025
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #107 on: May 08, 2024, 03:37:47 PM »
Seems Pubehead developed his man-management style from the Clough playbook. Shame he had neither the same charisma or Peter Taylor by his side.

Offline Clark W Griswold

  • Member
  • Posts: 5239
  • Location: Wallyworld
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #108 on: May 08, 2024, 04:18:17 PM »
Yeah whilst i don't have to have approval all of the time at work as i usually know myself if im doing well or not, to go into a review and basically feel like your being bullshitted to in the name of mind games wouldn't sit well with me either. A better approach would be to praise him (as he was doing well from memory) but add a little bit in the middle of the review about being a perfectionist and coming up with a couple of pointers to improve further and to say that all of the players will be having the same. I liked Warnock, but his form did drop off. I suppose this didn't help.

Offline Smithy

  • Member
  • Posts: 7212
  • Location: Windsor, Royal Berkshire, la de da
  • GM : 12.12.2024
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #109 on: May 08, 2024, 04:41:55 PM »
Weird seeing a footballer you're used to being slick and professional (and likeable) on MOTD/Sky etc. who has the platform of a podcast to have carte-blanche to shoot the shit, swear as much as he likes and be totally unguarded and honest about his career.

Horrendous to hear about how half-arsed and unprofessional O'Neill was. Absolute chancer as Rudy said.

Interesting to note as big as he thought Villa are, the reaction of fans at Leeds was even more impressive to him. I guess it'd be the same at Newcastle. Of all the sleeping giants, those two clubs seem to have the obsession that players are wow-ed by. Can't we get prospective signings to log onto H&V for a month to see how mental we are?

I think it's the "single club city" thing.  It unites a fan base in a way that I don't think is possible when the city has two, three, or more clubs fighting for the attention and affection of the fans.  We all have colleagues, family, friends even, who support a different local club.  You don't really find that in Leeds and Newcastle.

Online villadelph

  • Member
  • Posts: 6092
  • | UTV | 215 |
  • GM : 20.05.2025
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #110 on: May 08, 2024, 04:58:38 PM »
It just sounds like MON was a proper c**t, Houllier was a chippy old sod, McLeish was nice but a bit odd and inadequate, Lambert was about as communicative as a potato, and Lerner had absolutely no control over anything.

That's what I made of it at well. MON's training schedule and lack of conditioning is pretty shocking. Giving the players off Sunday thru Wednesday, then train Thursday/Friday is crazy to ever consider. As for Houllier, if what Warnock is saying is true, what a prick.. same with Lambert.

So relieved to have Unai now.


Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63430
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #111 on: May 08, 2024, 05:05:13 PM »
Weird seeing a footballer you're used to being slick and professional (and likeable) on MOTD/Sky etc. who has the platform of a podcast to have carte-blanche to shoot the shit, swear as much as he likes and be totally unguarded and honest about his career.

Horrendous to hear about how half-arsed and unprofessional O'Neill was. Absolute chancer as Rudy said.

Interesting to note as big as he thought Villa are, the reaction of fans at Leeds was even more impressive to him. I guess it'd be the same at Newcastle. Of all the sleeping giants, those two clubs seem to have the obsession that players are wow-ed by. Can't we get prospective signings to log onto H&V for a month to see how mental we are?

That would certainly make them want to sign.

Offline nigel

  • Member
  • Posts: 5770
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #112 on: May 08, 2024, 06:24:22 PM »
Seems Pubehead developed his man-management style from the Clough playbook. Shame he had neither the same charisma or Peter Taylor by his side.

You can understand why Milner, Young and Downing wanted out

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 9380
  • GM : 01.11.2024
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #113 on: May 08, 2024, 06:50:46 PM »
Why does Warnock have a thread on the main topic service board but players like Ashley Young, Jack Grealish, and Gabby Agbonlahor don't, despite their greater playing accomplishments at our club , is a mystery to me. Even if Warnock has expressed these dressing room secrets and it's of interest of O'Neil's reign and he is a great pundit who supportive of Villa, it is still wrong that his name is at the top of the main service board when it comes to the rules that seem banishing of former players. What are those rules, by the way? Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29309
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #114 on: May 08, 2024, 06:54:35 PM »
It's his old player thread from over a decade ago, bumped up because he gave the interview. It'll sink back into the peat marshes of H&V soon enough. I wouldn't worry about it, Footy.

Offline Bad English

  • Member
  • Posts: 45481
  • Age: 151
  • Location: Pyrénées Catalanes, France
  • I am Perpignan Villa
  • GM : 29.03.2025
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #115 on: May 08, 2024, 07:31:19 PM »
Why are some ex Prem players still allowed on main service board? Yet we can't talk about other ones?
It's on a 'Need to know' basis Donald.

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 11583
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #116 on: May 08, 2024, 08:56:55 PM »
Footy, don't fret. As Monty says there will be a bit of discussion and then it will drift away in it's own time such is the democratic nature of how long a thread lasts on the first page or two.
If there was a hard and fast rule that all ex player threads move to other football or memories, then we have McParland, McGrath, and Cowans in that order on previous pages.

As regards MON, I was certainly a fan pretty well until he dropped us in the shit. After all, we were winning more than before and that's all I cared about. In the very first year of MONs reign I remember doing work at the house of Phil Robinson (started as a youth at Villa and played a couple of 1st team games before carving out a solid professional playing career in the lower divisions) who was manager of Stafford Rangers in the Conference at the time. As I enthused about our upturn in fortunes and how MON was taking us places, I was taken aback. He was rather disparaging and didn't rate his abilities at all. Essentially saying he was all show and no real substance and that it would not end well.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2024, 09:31:57 PM by Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air »

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • Posts: 9380
  • GM : 01.11.2024
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #117 on: May 08, 2024, 08:58:32 PM »
By all accounts they are fully deserving but yes I must not get so bother about things here and there.
Something I look forward to improving next season

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #118 on: May 08, 2024, 09:16:19 PM »
By all accounts they are fully deserving but yes I must not get so bother about things here and there.
Something I look forward to improving next season


You really should give Villatalk a go, they positively frown on topics going off the subject over there, and profanity isn't allowed either. You'd love it.

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12322
Re: Stephen Warnock
« Reply #119 on: May 08, 2024, 09:18:27 PM »
By all accounts they are fully deserving but yes I must not get so bother about things here and there.
Something I look forward to improving next season


You really should give Villatalk a go, they positively frown on topics going off the subject over there, and profanity isn't allowed either. You'd love it.
No profanity? Fuuuuck, that's shit.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal