QuotekiQuote from: nigel on June 20, 2011, 09:48:53 PMHaving a bit of an arguement regarding our nickname.Could anyone tell me if it's VILLAINS or VILLANS?I've been told it's the VILLANS and it's a 'play on words' thing.I'm sure it's the VILLAINS though.If by some chance it is villans, why?ThanksIs it argument or arguement?
ki
Having a bit of an arguement regarding our nickname.Could anyone tell me if it's VILLAINS or VILLANS?I've been told it's the VILLANS and it's a 'play on words' thing.I'm sure it's the VILLAINS though.If by some chance it is villans, why?Thanks
Quote from: Eiresvillan on June 21, 2011, 01:22:21 AMIts Villans, as in come on you Villa(ns) meaning team..Dont know who started this Villains crap(as in a criminal)..Come on you Villans was shouted out regular in my Grandad's days at the club..More so than come on you Lions...How do you know they were shouting "Come on you villans" as opposed to "Come on you villains"? Surely they both sound the same?
Its Villans, as in come on you Villa(ns) meaning team..Dont know who started this Villains crap(as in a criminal)..Come on you Villans was shouted out regular in my Grandad's days at the club..More so than come on you Lions...
Definitely only and traditionally Villans in terms of terrace history, Club official use and newspaper reports. Villains seems to have crept in post 80s but is just a misunderstanding or mis-spelling. Lions is an abomination arising from an era when people were trying to vandalise football history and recreate clubs (as in Leeds playing in all white, Liverpool all red and Coventry becoming"sky Blues")Villans survives because it is the authentic and historic nickname of the Club.
I think it is the english language at work. Historically the phrase was heroes and villains but usage has changed it to villans so either is correct. Th great strength of english is that anything goes. It is a great big string bag of a language you can still keep stuffing stuff in. A typical example is the word invitation which has in recent time absorbed its own verb invite.
Can someone please check John Lerwill's excellent tome for references.
Ian Berry has just e-mailed me to contribute some clarification as to the term "Villan". There was once a very imaginitive sports reporter by the name of Jack Urry (whose name has cropped up in another history thread) who - way back ca. 1880 - concocted the term "Villan" (as opposed to "Villain") and it has stuck ever since. Jack Urry (who followed the Villa as a reporter and supporter from ca 1879) later wrote many articles for the Villa News and Record between 1906 and 1926. He died in 1928.
Quote from: brian green on June 21, 2011, 06:25:40 AMI think it is the english language at work. Historically the phrase was heroes and villains but usage has changed it to villans so either is correct. Th great strength of english is that anything goes. It is a great big string bag of a language you can still keep stuffing stuff in. A typical example is the word invitation which has in recent time absorbed its own verb invite.I bloody hope not Brian. I don't buy into this change by usage theory otherwise we will all have to put up with that bldy txt spk bollix in the future, and crap like "must of" and "should of". For me it's not evolution it's just laziness and ignorance. And I can't say I've ever seen "Villans" used generally , only in connection with our club. For me it's always been Villans for Villa fans, probably from the days of the Villa Villan. But ultimately it doesn't really matter.
I'd never heard Lions as a nickname until the Holte started using it in the "Come on You ..." chant so we might have oursleves to blame for that one.