Who out of the top five or six is going to want Sturridge?Man United - Rooney, Hernandes, Berbatov and OwenArsenal - Maybe but buying him is not their style.Man City - Not enough of a finished article for them. Burned his bridges when he left.Liverpool - Suarez, Carroll and KuytTottenham - Maybe but they have a few strikers already and seem to want to cut costs.Everton - No money.On top of that Chelsea probably see us as less of a rival than the others. They won't sell to United, Arsenal or Liverpool. The reasons he won't sigh for us are either based on Chelsea being keen to keep him or because we might not want him or we don't have the money. Maybe we could take him on loan?And N'Zogbia? The only clubs who seem to be interested are Newcastle and Sunderland. He really is not as good as some on here make out.
I think Roman, Ben Foster and N'Zogbia will be first three signing.
I can't see Blues wanting to do much business with us now so would take silly money to get Dann or Foster, so I would look else where.Cahill,Given and Pavlyuchenko.
Quote from: Hadley83 on June 17, 2011, 09:55:36 PMI can't see Blues wanting to do much business with us now so would take silly money to get Dann or Foster, so I would look else where.Cahill,Given and Pavlyuchenko.Blues will have no choice other than to do business on two counts - £40m financial 'black-hole' & (unfortunately for our beloved game) player power.
Next, a new keeper is a priority. Ben Foster would be good if Blues are prepared to do business with him, otherwise Craig Gordon might be worth a punt.
Quote from: Big Dick Edwards on June 18, 2011, 08:22:58 PMNext, a new keeper is a priority. Ben Foster would be good if Blues are prepared to do business with him, otherwise Craig Gordon might be worth a punt. Foster is hugely overrated. People only think he's any good because he's one of a minute number of even vaguely competent English keeprs. If he was Hungarian or something, he'd be playing in the Champo.Quite why anyone would prefer Foster over Given is a mystery to me.