Quote from: VillaSubmariner on May 15, 2011, 01:37:37 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on May 15, 2011, 01:32:54 PMQuote from: ozzjim on May 15, 2011, 01:24:25 PMAh but the failure to invest was down in large part down to MON being stubborn over cutting the wage bill with players that he had refused to play when the squad was on its knees last season. It all comes back to him eventually.Sorry, Ozz, that just isn't true.The General said at the time that MON had agreed to to the need to sell players, we made them available but in a depressed market we were unable to shift enough of them. He then appeared to want to buy his players regardless and was told no so he fucked off.Since then we have sold a few so there was nothing wrong with them but by sticking to the policy dogmatically last summer we effectively gave up on the season.So you think Randy should've paid out even more money on players then? Increasing the wage bill even more?Yes, absolutely, how else were we going to keep pace with our competitors?There was a decision to be made in August when we hadn't managed to sell players. Do business concerns take precedence and we stick with the policy or do football issues win and we sign the players? It's obvious which side came out on top.
Quote from: Chris Smith on May 15, 2011, 01:32:54 PMQuote from: ozzjim on May 15, 2011, 01:24:25 PMAh but the failure to invest was down in large part down to MON being stubborn over cutting the wage bill with players that he had refused to play when the squad was on its knees last season. It all comes back to him eventually.Sorry, Ozz, that just isn't true.The General said at the time that MON had agreed to to the need to sell players, we made them available but in a depressed market we were unable to shift enough of them. He then appeared to want to buy his players regardless and was told no so he fucked off.Since then we have sold a few so there was nothing wrong with them but by sticking to the policy dogmatically last summer we effectively gave up on the season.So you think Randy should've paid out even more money on players then? Increasing the wage bill even more?
Quote from: ozzjim on May 15, 2011, 01:24:25 PMAh but the failure to invest was down in large part down to MON being stubborn over cutting the wage bill with players that he had refused to play when the squad was on its knees last season. It all comes back to him eventually.Sorry, Ozz, that just isn't true.The General said at the time that MON had agreed to to the need to sell players, we made them available but in a depressed market we were unable to shift enough of them. He then appeared to want to buy his players regardless and was told no so he fucked off.Since then we have sold a few so there was nothing wrong with them but by sticking to the policy dogmatically last summer we effectively gave up on the season.
Ah but the failure to invest was down in large part down to MON being stubborn over cutting the wage bill with players that he had refused to play when the squad was on its knees last season. It all comes back to him eventually.
Quote from: Mazrim on May 15, 2011, 12:20:17 PMMON is the main reason this club has been in turmoil this season. And turmoil is the main reason we have struggled.I cant believe anybody thinks otherwise.Far too simplistic.MON was not to blame for the inept, insipid, toothless display last week, for example. We've got a lot of good players but too many times the whole does not equal the sum of the parts. That's down to the managers not making the most of what they have at their dspsal.
MON is the main reason this club has been in turmoil this season. And turmoil is the main reason we have struggled.I cant believe anybody thinks otherwise.
There is no way of knowing that. But if MoN had stayed and signed Robbie Keane and McGeady (both of whom we were heavily linked with) as well as Ireland. And continued sticking with the same XI players week in week out, where do you think we'd have finished? Remember there would've been no goals from Bent to add in. Just from Gabby with his niggling injuries and the goal machines that are Carew, Heskey and Keane.
We're actually only 4 points off 8th.
Quote from: VillaSubmariner on May 15, 2011, 01:47:06 PMWe're actually only 4 points off 8th. We've heard that a lot this season. "Only x amounts of points off xth [uninspiring] place". We've never, ever looked like being comfortably top half, and more worrying is that with two games left, we're still only three points above the trapdoor. It would take a ridiculous combination of results for us to go down, but the fact that it's still possible at this stage shows what an utter disaster Houllier has been. the only good thing to come out of this season is that Lerner obviously decided that we needed Darren Bent to keep us up, so broke the bank to keep us up. Hopefully a new, much better manager will reap the benefits of this. If we'd been comfortably top 10 in January I really don't think we'd have gone for Bent.
Quote from: VillaSubmariner on May 15, 2011, 01:55:03 PMThere is no way of knowing that. But if MoN had stayed and signed Robbie Keane and McGeady (both of whom we were heavily linked with) as well as Ireland. And continued sticking with the same XI players week in week out, where do you think we'd have finished? Remember there would've been no goals from Bent to add in. Just from Gabby with his niggling injuries and the goal machines that are Carew, Heskey and Keane. Sixth, if he'd been allowed to sign the players he'd wanted and we wouldn't have lost to the Blues, Albion and Wolves all in the same season. That's not my argument though, it's that we should have done better than we have. By keep harking back to MON walking out we are giving them excuses for a woeful performance on and off the pitch.
I do find it amusing that some of the people who were last season saying that MON under performed given the players he'd been able to sign are now making excuses for the complete fuck up this time with largely the same group with an £18m striker added and Milner gone. It hasn't been good enough.