I've got a feeling that the Indian board vetoed DRS for the duration of this series to nullify the effect of Graeme Swann. I read somewhere that almost 30% of his test wickets were LBW which is 10% more than Warne and Murali.
Quote from: Villan For Life on July 28, 2011, 09:53:32 AMI've got a feeling that the Indian board vetoed DRS for the duration of this series to nullify the effect of Graeme Swann. I read somewhere that almost 30% of his test wickets were LBW which is 10% more than Warne and Murali.They haven't used it since 2008. They're just not comfortable with it. Though -hopefully- if a few ropey decisions get overturned in their favour using hotspot, they might reconsider. I wasn't a fan of it to start with -the series in West India was close to farcical. But 2 reviews each per innings works. Teams can't over use it, or exploit it tactically. It also does away with excessive appealing for the most part - if you're really that convinced, use up one of your lifelines.